Cited by 115Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsGait Recognition and AnalysisProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Wearable Sensor-Based Rehabilitation Exercise Assessment for Knee Osteoarthritis

Open access
Chen, Kun-Hui, Chen, Po-Chao, Liu, Kai-Chun, Chan, Chia-Tai·2015·Sensors

Abstract

Since the knee joint bears the full weight load of the human body and the highest pressure loads while providing flexible movement, it is the body part most vulnerable and susceptible to osteoarthritis. In exercise therapy, the early rehabilitation stages last for approximately six weeks, during which the patient works with the physical therapist several times each week. The patient is afterwards given instructions for continuing rehabilitation exercise by him/herself at home. This study develops a rehabilitation exercise assessment mechanism using three wearable sensors mounted on the chest, thigh and shank of the working leg in order to enable the patients with knee osteoarthritis to manage their own rehabilitation progress. In this work, time-domain, frequency-domain features and angle information of the motion sensor signals are used to classify the exercise type and identify whether their postures are proper or not. Three types of rehabilitation exercise commonly prescribed to knee osteoarthritis patients are: Short-Arc Exercise, Straight Leg Raise, and Quadriceps Strengthening Mini-squats. After ten subjects performed the three kinds of rehabilitation activities, three validation techniques including 10-fold cross-validation, within subject cross validation, and leave-one-subject cross validation are utilized to confirm the proposed mechanism. The overall recognition accuracy for exercise type classification is 97.29% and for exercise posture identification it is 88.26%. The experimental results demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed mechanism which can help patients perform rehabilitation movements and progress effectively. Moreover, the proposed mechanism is able to detect multiple errors at once, fulfilling the requirements for rehabilitation assessment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s150204193

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For wearable devices with cameras and motion sensors used in rehabilitation exercise evaluation for knee osteoarthritis, the accuracy for activity type categorisation was 97%, while the accuracy for exercise posture recognition was 88%.

    “The accuracy for activity type categorisation was 97%, while the accuracy for exercise posture recognition was 88% [91].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]Theodoridis S. Koutroumbas K. Pattern Recognition 3rd ed. Elsevier San Diego, CA, USA 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, K.-H., Chen, P.-C., Liu, K.-C., & Chan, C.-T.
Affiliations
  • Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TW)
  • National Yang Ming University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chan, Chia-Tai
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2015-02-12
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
4193-4211
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993722932
Cited by
115
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3
FWCI
8.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 103-2221-E-010 -013 -MY2)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
knee osteoarthritis, wearable sensors, home-based rehabilitation, straight leg raise, gait analysis, frequency-domain features
MeSH terms
Exercise Therapy, Humans, Knee Joint, Telemedicine, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Quadriceps Muscle, Remote Sensing Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review