Cited by 70Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Beyond fitness tracking: The use of consumer-grade wearable data from normal volunteers in cardiovascular and lipidomics research

Open access
Lim, Weng Khong, Davila, Sonia, Teo, Jing Xian, Yang, Chengxi, Pua, Chee Jian, Blöcker, Christopher, Lim, Jing Quan, Ching, Jianhong +9 more·2018·PLOS Biology

Abstract

The use of consumer-grade wearables for purposes beyond fitness tracking has not been comprehensively explored. We generated and analyzed multidimensional data from 233 normal volunteers, integrating wearable data, lifestyle questionnaires, cardiac imaging, sphingolipid profiling, and multiple clinical-grade cardiovascular and metabolic disease markers. We show that subjects can be stratified into distinct clusters based on daily activity patterns and that these clusters are marked by distinct demographic and behavioral patterns. While resting heart rates (RHRs) performed better than step counts in being associated with cardiovascular and metabolic disease markers, step counts identified relationships between physical activity and cardiac remodeling, suggesting that wearable data may play a role in reducing overdiagnosis of cardiac hypertrophy or dilatation in active individuals. Wearable-derived activity levels can be used to identify known and novel activity-modulated sphingolipids that are in turn associated with insulin sensitivity. Our findings demonstrate the potential for wearables in biomedical research and personalized health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.2004285

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Algorithms have been developed to automatically process and interpret wearables data to present evidence-based health insights such as detection of inflammation or prediction of cardiometabolic health based on activity habits.

    “To address this data deluge, we and others have recently developed algorithms to automatically process and interpret wearables data in order to present evidence-based health insights such as detection of inflammation or prediction of cardiometabolic health based on activity habits [40-43].”

    From Wearables and the Medical Revolution (2018) · cites this paper as [42]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lim, W. K., Davila, S., Teo, J. X., Yang, C., Pua, C. J., Blöcker, C., Lim, J. Q., Ching, J., Yap, J. J. L., Tan, S. Y., Sahlén, A., Chin, C. W.-L., Teh, B. T., Rozen, S. G., Cook, S. A., Yeo, K. K., & Tan, P.
Affiliations
  • SingHealth (SG)
  • National Heart Centre Singapore (SG)
  • Duke-NUS Medical School (SG)
  • National Cancer Centre Singapore (SG)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
Corresponding author
  • Lim, Weng Khong
  • Cook, Stuart Alexander
  • Yeo, Khung Keong
  • Tan, Patrick
Venue
PLOS Biology
Published
2018-02-27
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
e2004285
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2787945643
Cited by
70
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 5
FWCI
7.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Lee Foundation
  • Duke-NUS Medical School
  • Tanoto Foundation
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council (NMRC/STaR/0026/2015, NMRC/STaR/0011/2012, STaR/0026/2015, 0026/2015)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
consumer-grade wearable devices, activity monitoring, resting heart rate, step count, physical activity, cardiac remodeling, cardiac hypertrophy, cardiac dilatation, sphingolipids, lipidomics, insulin sensitivity, cardiovascular risk markers, lifestyle questionnaire, activity patterns, overdiagnosis
MeSH terms
Medical Overuse, Fitness Trackers, Adult, Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena, Female, Cardiomegaly, Heart Rate, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sphingolipids, Exercise, Ventricular Remodeling, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review