Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 918

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology

Open access
Engesser, Sven, Ernst, Nicole, Esser, Frank, Büchel, Florin·2017·Information, Communication & Society

Abstract

Populism is a relevant but contested concept in political communication research. It has been well-researched in political manifestos and the mass media. The present study focuses on another part of the hybrid media system and explores how politicians in four countries (AT, CH, IT, UK) use Facebook and Twitter for populist purposes. Five key elements of populism are derived from the literature: emphasizing the sovereignty of the people, advocating for the people, attacking the elite, ostracizing others, and invoking the ‘heartland’. A qualitative text analysis reveals that populism manifests itself in a fragmented form on social media. Populist statements can be found across countries, parties, and politicians’ status levels. While a broad range of politicians advocate for the people, attacks on the economic elite are preferred by left-wing populists. Attacks on the media elite and ostracism of others, however, are predominantly conducted by right-wing speakers. Overall, the paper provides an in-depth analysis of populism on social media. It shows that social media give the populist actors the freedom to articulate their ideology and spread their messages. The paper also contributes to a refined conceptualization and measurement of populism in future studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1369118x.2016.1207697

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. 10.4324/9781315623016 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00657.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1080/1369118X.2013.873068 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/1464884911415972 · DOI
  5. 10.1057/9780230592100_1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bartlett J., 2014, Democracy in Britain: Essays in honour of James Cornford, 91
  7. 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1007/978-1-349-23547-6 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1080/1356931042000263546 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.2307/3235370 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1080/10584609.2011.564605 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1111/1467-9248.00184 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1057/9781403920072_2 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759477.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Chadwick A., 2016, The Routledge companion to social media and politics, 7
  17. 10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02019.x · doi:10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02019.x
  18. Dahl R. A., 1956, A preface to democratic theory
  19. 10.4135/9781452272047 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1080/1369118X.2014.952659 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Gerbaudo P., 2014, Social media, politics and the state: Protests, revolutions, riots, crime and policing in the age of Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, 16
  22. 10.1177/1461444812450685 · doi:10.1177/1461444812450685
  23. 10.1017/CBO9780511790867 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1177/0010414009331721 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1017/CBO9780511730245 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1080/1461670x.2015.1066231 · DOI
  27. Ionescu G., 1969, Populism: Its meanings and national characteristics
  28. 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01388.x · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1177/1461444814522952 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Klinger U., 2016, The Routledge companion to social media and politics, 23
  32. 10.1111/comt.12029 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1080/01402382.2014.887879 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Kriesi H., 2015, European populism in the shadow of the great recession
  35. 10.1080/13183222.2011.11009067 · doi:10.1080/13183222.2011.11009067
  36. Mazzoleni G., 2003, The media and neo-populism: A contemporary comparative analysis, 1
  37. 10.1057/9780230592100_4 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1057/9781137275844_3 · DOI
  39. 10.1057/9781403920072_1 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x · DOI · Paper page
  41. Priester K., 2007, Populismus: Historische und aktuelle Erscheinungsformen
  42. Priester K., 2012, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 62, 3
  43. 10.1111/1467-9248.12074 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1080/01402382.2011.616665 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1177/1354068811436065 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Shils E. A., 1956, The torment of secrecy: The background and consequences of American security policies
  47. 10.1080/1369118X.2014.902984 · DOI
  48. Taggart P., 2000, Populism
  49. 10.1057/9781403920072_4 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1080/1356931042000263528 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 918

Metadata

Authors
Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F.
Venue
Information, Communication & Society
Published
2016-07-08
Volume
20
Issue
8
Pages
1109-1126
ISSN
  • 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4462
OpenAlex
W2462214272
Cited by
918
References
1
FWCI
267.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1369118x.2016.1207697
The paper
Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2016.1207697

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.