The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology
Open accessAbstract
Populism is a relevant but contested concept in political communication research. It has been well-researched in political manifestos and the mass media. The present study focuses on another part of the hybrid media system and explores how politicians in four countries (AT, CH, IT, UK) use Facebook and Twitter for populist purposes. Five key elements of populism are derived from the literature: emphasizing the sovereignty of the people, advocating for the people, attacking the elite, ostracizing others, and invoking the ‘heartland’. A qualitative text analysis reveals that populism manifests itself in a fragmented form on social media. Populist statements can be found across countries, parties, and politicians’ status levels. While a broad range of politicians advocate for the people, attacks on the economic elite are preferred by left-wing populists. Attacks on the media elite and ostracism of others, however, are predominantly conducted by right-wing speakers. Overall, the paper provides an in-depth analysis of populism on social media. It shows that social media give the populist actors the freedom to articulate their ideology and spread their messages. The paper also contributes to a refined conceptualization and measurement of populism in future studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice & Using Software
Kuckartz, U. (2014) · doi:10.4135/9781446288719 · Cited by 1,411
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- 10.4324/9781315623016 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00657.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/1369118X.2013.873068 · DOI
- 10.1177/1464884911415972 · DOI
- 10.1057/9780230592100_1 · DOI · Paper page
- Bartlett J., 2014, Democracy in Britain: Essays in honour of James Cornford, 91
- 10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-349-23547-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/1356931042000263546 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3235370 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/10584609.2011.564605 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-9248.00184 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1057/9781403920072_2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759477.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Chadwick A., 2016, The Routledge companion to social media and politics, 7
- 10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02019.x · doi:10.1111/j.1662-6370.2011.02019.x
- Dahl R. A., 1956, A preface to democratic theory
- 10.4135/9781452272047 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/1369118X.2014.952659 · DOI · Paper page
- Gerbaudo P., 2014, Social media, politics and the state: Protests, revolutions, riots, crime and policing in the age of Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, 16
- 10.1177/1461444812450685 · doi:10.1177/1461444812450685
- 10.1017/CBO9780511790867 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0010414009331721 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511730245 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/1461670x.2015.1066231 · DOI
- Ionescu G., 1969, Populism: Its meanings and national characteristics
- 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01388.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1461444814522952 · DOI · Paper page
- Klinger U., 2016, The Routledge companion to social media and politics, 23
- 10.1111/comt.12029 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01402382.2014.887879 · DOI · Paper page
- Kriesi H., 2015, European populism in the shadow of the great recession
- 10.1080/13183222.2011.11009067 · doi:10.1080/13183222.2011.11009067
- Mazzoleni G., 2003, The media and neo-populism: A contemporary comparative analysis, 1
- 10.1057/9780230592100_4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1057/9781137275844_3 · DOI
- 10.1057/9781403920072_1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x · DOI · Paper page
- Priester K., 2007, Populismus: Historische und aktuelle Erscheinungsformen
- Priester K., 2012, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 62, 3
- 10.1111/1467-9248.12074 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01402382.2011.616665 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1354068811436065 · DOI · Paper page
- Shils E. A., 1956, The torment of secrecy: The background and consequences of American security policies
- 10.1080/1369118X.2014.902984 · DOI
- Taggart P., 2000, Populism
- 10.1057/9781403920072_4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/1356931042000263528 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108595841 · Cited by 2,986
Social media and populism: an elective affinity?
Gerbaudo, P. (2018) · Media, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0163443718772192 · Cited by 533
Populist online communication: introduction to the special issue
Engesser, S., Fawzi, N., & Larsson, A. O. (2017) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1328525 · Cited by 429
Self-citationA systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy
Lorenz-Spreen, P., Oswald, L., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1 · Cited by 348
“Participation political (78), general (29), voting (21), civic engagement (13), protest participation (13), .”
BackgroundInfluentialErnst, N., Blassnig, S., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., & Esser, F. (2019) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118823358 · Cited by 253
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F.
- Venue
- Information, Communication & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-07-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1109-1126
- ISSN
- 1369-118X (ISSN-L)
- 1468-4462
- OpenAlex
- W2462214272
- Cited by
- 918
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 267.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1369118x.2016.1207697
- The paper
- Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2016.1207697
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.