The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the Extent and Types of Hate Speech in Fringe Communities: A Case Study of Alt-Right Communities on 8chan, 4chan, and Reddit
Open accessAbstract
Recent right-wing extremist terrorists were active in online fringe communities connected to the alt-right movement. Although these are commonly considered as distinctly hateful, racist, and misogynistic, the prevalence of hate speech in these communities has not been comprehensively investigated yet, particularly regarding more implicit and covert forms of hate. This study exploratively investigates the extent, nature, and clusters of different forms of hate speech in political fringe communities on Reddit, 4chan, and 8chan. To do so, a manual quantitative content analysis of user comments ( N = 6,000) was combined with an automated topic modeling approach. The findings of the study not only show that hate is prevalent in all three communities (24% of comments contained explicit or implicit hate speech), but also provide insights into common types of hate speech expression, targets, and differences between the studied communities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus, our findings are consistent with prior research showing that alternative social media and particularly fringe communities like 4Chan provide a welcoming environment for the spread of toxic content (Finkelstein et al., 2020; Rieger et al., 2021; Zannettou et al., 2018), likely due to their self-positioning as safe havens for such statements and their corresponding loose moderation rules (Fris”
From The Seed of Doubt: Examining the Role of Alternative Social and News Media for the Birth of a Conspiracy Theory (2024) · cites this paper as Rieger et al., 2021
Citations
Cites
A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena
Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792779443000049 · Cited by 1,132
Advances in Pre-Training Distributed Word Representations
Mikolov, T., Grave, É., Bojanowski, P., Puhrsch, C., & Joulin, A. (2018) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/4b3prw5a5tze · Cited by 1,052
Baumgartner, J., Zannettou, S., Keegan, B., Squire, M., & Blackburn, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7347 · Cited by 881
Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition
Lapidot‐Lefler, N., & Barak, A. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.014 · Cited by 709
Phillips, W. (2015) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/10288.001.0001 · Cited by 677
BTM: Topic Modeling over Short Texts
Cheng, X., Yan, X., Lan, Y., & Guo, J. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2014.2313872 · Cited by 568
Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2017) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1293130 · Cited by 320
Hate Lingo: A Target-Based Linguistic Analysis of Hate Speech in Social Media
ElSherief, M., Kulkarni, V., Nguyen, D., Yang Wang, W., & Belding, E. (2018) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.15041 · Cited by 294
Hawley, G. (2017) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/hawl18512 · Cited by 293
“You Don't Understand, This is a New War!” Analysis of Hate Speech in News Web Sites' Comments
Erjavec, K., & Kovačić, M. P. (2012) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2011.619679 · Cited by 282
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Ben-David A., 2016, International Journal of Communication, 10, 1167
- Campbell J. C., 2003, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993
- Conway M., Macnair L., Scrivens R. (2019). Right-wing extremists’ persistent online presence: History and contemporary trends (pp. 1–24). International Centre for Counter-Terrorism (ICCT). https://icct.nl/app/uploads/2019/11/RWEXOnline-1.pdf
- Gagliardone I., 2015, Countering online hate speech
- Günther E., 2017, International Journal of Communication, 11, 3051
- Kümpel A. S., 2019, Wandel der Sprach- und Debattenkultur in sozialen Online-Medien. Ein Literaturüberblick zu Ursachen und Wirkungen von inziviler Kommunikation
- Meibauer J., 2013, Hassrede/Hate Speech. Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zu einer aktuellen Diskussion, 1
- Nagle A., 2017, Kill all normies: The online culture wars from Tumblr and 4chan to the alt-right and Trump
- Sanchez B. C., 2020, Pathways: A Journal of Humanistic and Social Inquiry, 1, 1
- Wendling M., 2018, Alt-right: From 4chan to the White House
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Walther, J. B. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.010 · Cited by 153
Make Reddit Great Again: Assessing Community Effects of Moderation Interventions on r/The_Donald
Trujillo, A., & Cresci, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555639 · Cited by 65
Schmid, U. K. (2023) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231198169 · Cited by 50
Memes, humor, and the far right’s strategic mainstreaming
Schmid, U. K., Schulze, H., & Drexel, A. (2024) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2024.2329610 · Cited by 41
Schatto-Eckrodt, T., Clever, L., & Frischlich, L. (2024) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393241246281 · Cited by 32
“Previous research has indicated that conspiracy theories thrive on both types of platforms (Kou et al., 2017; Zeng & Sch¨afer, 2021) but fringe communities may host an even larger share of explicitly hostile content (Rieger et al., 2021).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Rieger, D., Kümpel, A. S., Wich, M., Kiening, T., & Groh, G.
- Affiliations
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Venue
- Social Media + Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-10
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 2056-3051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3209715443
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 14
- FWCI
- 5.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Social Media + Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- hate speech, alt-right, 4chan, Reddit, right-wing extremism, implicit hate speech, online comments, topic modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
