The DOI matches its Crossref record; 209 of the 209 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding Suicide Risk Within the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Framework: Insights, Challenges, and Future Research Considerations
Open accessAbstract
Suicide is a leading cause of death worldwide. Prior research has focused primarily on sociodemographic and psychiatric risk factors with little improvement in the prediction or prevention of suicidal behavior over time. The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) may be an especially useful framework for advancing research in this area. This article provides a brief and broad overview of research on suicidal behavior relating to each of the RDoC domains—highlighting the RDoC construct(s) where research has focused, the construct(s) where research is lacking, and suggestions for future research directions. We also discuss major challenges for suicide research within the RDoC framework, including the intersection of RDoC domains, interaction of domains with the environment, incorporation of developmental stage, integration of distal and proximal processes, and inclusion of suicide-specific constructs. We conclude by underscoring important considerations for future research aimed at using the RDoC framework to study suicidal behavior and other forms of psychopathology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This study had many strengths, including prospective evaluation of suicidal outcomes, measurement at multiple Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) levels in a transdiagnostic sample [48], and the dynamic, multilevel statistical approach allowing for prospective modeling of diathesis and stress interplay.”
From HPA axis response and psychosocial stress as interactive predictors of suicidal ideation and behavior in adolescent females: a multilevel diathesis-stress framework (2018) · cites this paper as [48]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is an important consideration because chronic or relatively stable processes and characteristics are likely more relevant to understanding long-term or general risk (Glenn et al., 2017), and their relatively low temporal variance means they lack the temporal sensitivity required to be robust predictors of short-term risk.”
From Sleep and suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies (2020) · cites this paper as Glenn et al., 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed.
Carter, M. J. (2014) · Therapeutic Recreation Journal · Cited by 15,154
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 1×
“Self-reports of suicide risk may be limited by individuals’ motivation to hide or conceal their suicidal plans or intent (Busch et al., 2003; Qin & Nordentoft, 2005) and generally poor ability to report on the processes underlying their behavior (Nisbett & Wilson, 1977).”
BackgroundFeeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151 · Cited by 8,094
Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D. S., Quinn, K., Sanislow, C., & Wang, P. (2010) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379 · Cited by 7,067
The interpersonal theory of suicide.
Van Orden, K. A., Witte, T. K., Cukrowicz, K. C., Braithwaite, S. R., Selby, E. A., & Joiner, T. E. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0018697 · Cited by 5,292
Suicide: A Study in Sociology.
Alpert, H., Durkheim, É., Spaulding, J. A., Simpson, G. L., Solovay, S. A., Mueller, J. H., & Catlin, G. (1951) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2088294 · Cited by 3,910
Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research
Franklin, J. C., Ribeiro, J. D., Fox, K. R., Bentley, K. H., Kleiman, E. M., Huang, X., Musacchio, K. M., Jaroszewski, A. C., Chang, B. P., & Nock, M. K. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000084 · Cited by 3,784
Self-citationTesting the efficiency and independence of attentional networks
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892902317361886 · Cited by 3,717
Cognitive and affective development in adolescence
Steinberg, L. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.005 · Cited by 2,978
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 10.1097/00004583-201002000-00006 · DOI · Paper page
- Linehan M. M., 1993, Cognitive behavioural therapy of borderline personality disorder
- Mufson L., 1993, Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 6, 97
- National Institute of Mental Health, 2008, Strategic plan for research
- Silverman S. E., 2006, U.S. Patent No. 7,062,443
- Wong P. W., 2010, Primary Care Companion to the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 12, 651
- World Health Organization, 2014, Preventing suicide: A global imperative
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sleep and suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies
Liu, R. T., Steele, S. J., Hamilton, J. L., Do, Q. B. P., Furbish, K., Burke, T. A., Martinez, A. P., & Gerlus, N. (2020) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101895 · Cited by 239
“This is an important consideration because chronic or relatively stable processes and characteristics are likely more relevant to understanding long-term or general risk (Glenn et al., 2017), and their relatively low temporal variance means they lack the temporal sensitivity required to be robust predictors of short-t…”
BackgroundAdolescent Suicide as a Failure of Acute Stress-Response Systems.
Miller, A. B., & Prinstein, M. J. (2019) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095625 · Cited by 235
“Notably, the prevalence of suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, and death by suicide all increase dramatically during the adolescent transition, a unique period of developmental vulnerability for suicidal ideation and behaviors (Curtin et al. 2016, Glenn et al. 2017b, Kõlves & de Leo 2017).”
BackgroundHigh-frequency repetitive TMS for suicidal ideation in adolescents with depression
Croarkin, P. E., Nakonezny, P. A., Deng, Z.-D., Romanowicz, M., Voort, J. L. V., Camsari, D. D., Schak, K. M., Port, J. D., & Lewis, C. P. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.06.048 · Cited by 95
Eisenlohr-Moul, T. A., Miller, A. B., Giletta, M., Hastings, P. D., Rudolph, K. D., Nock, M. K., & Prinstein, M. J. (2018) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-018-0206-6 · Cited by 87
Self-citationBecker, S. P., & Willcutt, E. G. (2019) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-018-1136-x · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Glenn, C. R., Cha, C. B., Kleiman, E. M., & Nock, M. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Rochester (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Glenn, Catherine R.
- Venue
- Clinical Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-04-26
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 568-592
- ISSN
- 2167-7026 (ISSN-L)
- 2167-7034
- PMC
- PMC5487002
- OpenAlex
- W2608797004
- Semantic Scholar
- 113da42c30bbb0cf6f986e8d40828904ed4a8879
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 209
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 16.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Clinical Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Chet and Will Griswold Suicide Prevention Fund
- John T. and Catherine D. MacArthur Foundation
- National Institute of Mental Health (HHSN271201500513P)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- suicide risk, suicidal behavior, Research Domain Criteria, suicide prevention, suicide risk prediction, risk factors, developmental stages, psychopathology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review