The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TEER Measurement Techniques for In Vitro Barrier Model Systems
Open accessAbstract
Transepithelial/transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) is a widely accepted quantitative technique to measure the integrity of tight junction dynamics in cell culture models of endothelial and epithelial monolayers. TEER values are strong indicators of the integrity of the cellular barriers before they are evaluated for transport of drugs or chemicals. TEER measurements can be performed in real time without cell damage and generally are based on measuring ohmic resistance or measuring impedance across a wide spectrum of frequencies. The measurements for various cell types have been reported with commercially available measurement systems and also with custom-built microfluidic implementations. Some of the barrier models that have been widely characterized using TEER include the blood-brain barrier (BBB), gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and pulmonary models. Variations in these values can arise due to factors such as temperature, medium formulation, and passage number of cells. The aim of this article is to review the different TEER measurement techniques and analyze their strengths and weaknesses, determine the significance of TEER in drug toxicity studies, examine the various in vitro models and microfluidic organs-on-chips implementations using TEER measurements in some widely studied barrier models (BBB, GI tract, and pulmonary), and discuss the various factors that can affect TEER measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reconstituting organ-level lung functions on a chip
Huh, D., Matthews, B. D., Mammoto, A., Montoya-Zavala, M., Hsin, H. Y., & Ingber, D. E. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1188302 · Cited by 4,250
Kim, H. J., Huh, D., Hamilton, G., & Ingber, D. E. (2012) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c2lc40074j · Cited by 1,734
Derivation of blood-brain barrier endothelial cells from human pluripotent stem cells
Lippmann, E. S., Azarin, S. M., Kay, J. E., Nessler, R. A., Wilson, H. K., Al-Ahmad, A., Palecek, S. P., & Shusta, E. V. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2247 · Cited by 800
Microfabrication of human organs-on-chips
Huh, D., Kim, H. J., Fraser, J. P., Shea, D. E., Khan, M., Bahinski, A., Hamilton, G. A., & Ingber, D. E. (2013) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.137 · Cited by 712
The blood-brain barrier: an engineering perspective
Wong, A. D., Ye, M., Levy, A. F., Rothstein, J. D., Bergles, D. E., & Searson, P. C. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroengineering · doi:10.3389/fneng.2013.00007 · Cited by 662
Electrical resistance of brain microvascular endothelium
Crone, C., & Olesen, S. P. (1982) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(82)91227-6 · Cited by 491
Esch, M. B., Mahler, G. J., Stokol, T., & Shuler, M. L. (2014) · Lab Chip · doi:10.1039/c4lc00371c · Cited by 281
van Midwoud, P. M., Merema, M. T., Verpoorte, E., & Groothuis, G. M. M. (2010) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c0lc00043d · Cited by 203
A microfluidic system to evaluate intestinal absorption
Imura, Y., Asano, Y., Sato, K., & Yoshimura, E. (2009) · Analytical Sciences · doi:10.2116/analsci.25.1403 · Cited by 159
Cited by
A guide to the organ-on-a-chip
Leung, C. M., de Haan, P., Ronaldson-Bouchard, K., Kim, G.-A., Ko, J., Rho, H. S., Chen, Z., Habibovic, P., Jeon, N. L., Takayama, S., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00118-6 · Cited by 1,116
Self-citationHelms, H. C., Abbott, N. J., Burek, M., Cecchelli, R., Couraud, P.-O., Deli, M. A., Förster, C., Galla, H. J., Romero, I. A., Shusta, E. V., et al. (2016) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1177/0271678x16630991 · Cited by 843
Park, T.-E., Mustafaoglu, N., Herland, A., Hasselkus, R., Mannix, R., FitzGerald, E. A., Prantil-Baun, R., Watters, A., Henry, O., Benz, M., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10588-0 · Cited by 594
Bacteriocins as a new generation of antimicrobials: toxicity aspects and regulations
Soltani, S., Hammami, R., Cotter, P. D., Rebuffat, S., Said, L. B., Gaudreau, H., Bédard, F., Biron, E., Drider, D., & Fliss, I. (2021) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuaa039 · Cited by 544
Henry, O. Y. F., Villenave, R., Cronce, M. J., Leineweber, W. D., Benz, M. A., & Ingber, D. E. (2017) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c7lc00155j · Cited by 482
Metadata
- Authors
- Srinivasan, B., Kolli, A. R., Esch, M. B., Abaci, H. E., Shuler, M. L., & Hickman, J. J.
- Venue
- SLAS Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 107-126
- ISSN
- 2472-6303 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154555351
- Cited by
- 2,145
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 34.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TEER Measurement Techniques for In Vitro Barrier Model Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/2211068214561025
- The paper
- Srinivasan, B., Kolli, A. R., Esch, M. B., Abaci, H. E., Shuler, M. L., & Hickman, J. J. (2015). TEER Measurement Techniques for In Vitro Barrier Model Systems. SLAS Technology. https://doi.org/10.1177/2211068214561025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
