Cited by 36Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesFoot and Ankle SurgerySport Psychology and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of Age and Sex on Psychological Readiness and Patient-Reported Outcomes 6 Months After Primary ACL Reconstruction

Open access

Abstract

Background: Successful return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) can be affected by a patient’s physical and psychological state throughout the rehabilitation process. Purpose: To prospectively compare differences in patients at 6 months after primary ACLR with the ACL–Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) or pediatric (Pedi)-IKDC, Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (Pedi-FABS), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System–Psychological Stress Experiences (PROMIS-PSE) scores. Study Design: Prospective cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients enrolled were 8 to 35 years old who underwent primary ACLR and had their 6-month follow-up appointments between December 2018 and March 2020. Patients were divided into 3 age groups as follows: (1) preadolescents (10-14 years); (2) adolescents (15-18 years); and (3) adults (>18 years). Outcomes on the ACL-RSI, IKDC/Pedi-IKDC, Pedi-FABS, and PROMIS-PSE were compared according to age group, graft type (hamstring, patellar tendon, quadriceps, or iliotibial band autograft), and sex. Results: A total of 176 patients (69 male, 107 female), with a mean age of 17.1 ± 3.1 years were included in the study. The mean ACL-RSI scores were significantly different among age groups (preadolescents, 75 ± 18.9; adolescents, 61.5 ± 20.4; and adults, 52.5 ± 19.8 [ P < .001]) and graft types ( P = .024). The IKDC and PROMIS-PSE scores were also significantly different among age groups ( P < .001 and P = .044, respectively) and graft types ( P = .034 and P < .001, respectively), with the iliotibial graft and the younger age group performing the best. There was no significant difference in the Pedi-FABS either by age group ( P = .127) or graft type ( P = .198). Female patients had lower ACL-RSI scores and higher (worse) scores on PROMIS-PSE than their male counterparts ( P = .019 and P < .001, respectively), with no sex-based differences on IKDC or Pedi-FABS scores. The ACL-RSI and IKDC were positively correlated (Spearman r = 0.57; P < .001), while the ACL-RSI and PROMIS-PSE were negatively correlated (Pearson r = –0.34; P < .001). Conclusion: This study suggests that psychological profiles and subjective perceptions of knee function 6 months after ACLR may vary in patients of different ages and between the sexes. Preadolescent patients had better scores on a majority of patient-reported outcomes compared with adolescent and adult patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/23259671231166012

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1080/02699052.2021.1896034 · DOI
  2. 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093398 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1177/0363546511422999 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/0363546513489284 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1177/1941738120912846 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/jpepsy/jsy010 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/0363546506290186 · DOI
  8. 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000275 · DOI
  9. 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00173 · DOI
  10. 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000792 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/0363546513518412 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/0363546513496548 · DOI
  13. 10.2106/JBJS.16.00848 · DOI
  14. 10.1177/03635465010290051301 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.csm.2016.08.001 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/1941738119846502 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1177/0363546510383002 · DOI
  18. 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000751 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.4085/1062-6050-0034.20 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s10578-012-0289-y · DOI
  21. 10.2165/00007256-200434040-00006 · DOI
  22. 10.1007/s00167-004-0591-8 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V37N4p273 · DOI
  24. 10.1177/0363546512456836 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/0363546518825258 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1177/0363546519825499 · DOI
  27. 10.1097/00042752-199904000-00004 · DOI
  28. Newcomer RR, 2003, J Athl Train, 38, 163
  29. 10.1177/0363546515589108 · DOI
  30. 10.1177/1941738117745806 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1177/0363546510376053 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.08.040 · DOI
  33. 10.1097/JSA.0b013e31820b960d · DOI
  34. 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00170 · DOI
  35. 10.1177/1941738116685299 · DOI
  36. 10.1177/0363546514523388 · DOI
  37. 10.1177/0363546515573008 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001222 · DOI
  39. Udry E, 2003, J Athl Train, 38, 167
  40. 10.1016/j.ptsp.2007.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1177/0363546513517540 · DOI
  42. 10.1177/0363546518773757 · DOI
  43. 10.1177/0363546515621554 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.5694/mja17.00974 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Milewski, M. D., Traver, J. L., Coene, R. P., Williams, K., Sugimoto, D., Kramer, D. E., Kocher, M. S., Micheli, L. J., Yen, Y.-M., & Christino, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Milewski, Matthew D.
Venue
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2023-06-01
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
23259671231166012-23259671231166012
ISSN
2325-9671 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380077898
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3
FWCI
8.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, psychological readiness, return to sport, patient-reported outcomes, age differences, sex differences, psychological stress, ACL-RSI, IKDC score, graft type, iliotibial band autograft, hamstring tendon graft, patellar tendon autograft, pediatric knee injury, knee function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review