The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 22 of the 49 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The relationship between psychological readiness to return to sport and kinesiophobia in teens and young adults after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Psychological readiness and kinesiophobia are important variables to consider for return to sport clearance after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Both have been associated in adult populations; however, it is unknown if they are associated in teens after ACL reconstruction. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between psychological readiness and kinesiophobia in teens and young adults after ACL reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective cohort design was used. Participants aged 13–30 years, who were 6–12 months post-ACL reconstruction, who completed the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia and the ACL Return-to-Sport after Injury Scale were included from a multi-site registry. Two age groups were established (teen: <19 years, adult: ≥19 years), and psychological readiness was categorized using an ACL Return-to-Sport after Injury Scale cutoff of 77 (<77 = unacceptable). Independent samples t-tests, Pearson correlations, and binary logistic regression were performed to examine associations between kinesiophobia and psychological readiness, and the influences of age, sex, and months since surgery. Results: 315 participants (54.3% female; 18.3 ± 3.3 years; 8.2 ± 1.9 months post-surgery) were analyzed. ACL Return-to-Sport after Injury Scale and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia scores were significantly correlated in both groups (teen: r = −0.59, p < 0.001; adult: r = −0.45, p < 0.001), with no significant difference in the correlation coefficients (z = −1.49). Overall, 47.9% scored below the ACL Return-to-Sport after Injury pass threshold. Each one-point increase in kinesiophobia was associated with a 28% higher likelihood of reporting unacceptable psychological readiness. Adults were twice as likely as teens to report unacceptable psychological readiness. Discussion: Greater psychological readiness was associated with lower kinesiophobia in both teens and young adults. Additionally, nearly half reported poor psychological readiness, highlighting the need for interventions aimed at improving psychological readiness during ACL rehabilitation.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a multisite retrospective cohort of 315 teens and young adults 6–12 months after primary ACL reconstruction, greater psychological readiness (ACL-RSI) was inversely correlated with kinesiophobia (TSK-11) in both age groups. Nearly half (47.9%) scored below the ACL-RSI readiness threshold, and each one-point higher TSK-11 score was associated with 28% greater odds of unacceptable readiness.
Key findings
- ACL-RSI and TSK-11 scores were significantly correlated in teens (r = −0.59, p < 0.001) and adults (r = −0.45, p < 0.001), with no significant difference between the correlation coefficients (z = −1.49).
- Overall, 47.9% scored below the ACL-RSI cutoff of 77; participants with unacceptable readiness had higher kinesiophobia (20.97 ± 4.72) than those with acceptable readiness (16.14 ± 3.92, p < 0.001, d = 2.81).
- In logistic regression, each one-point increase in TSK-11 was associated with 28% higher odds of unacceptable ACL-RSI (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.20–1.36); adults were twice as likely as teens to report unacceptable readiness (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.11–3.61). Sex and months since surgery were not significant covariates.
- Teens reported greater psychological readiness (mean difference 14.0, p < 0.001, d = 0.64) and lower kinesiophobia (mean difference 1.6, p = 0.007, d = 0.32) than adults; no sex differences were found in ACL-RSI or TSK-11 scores.
Methods
- Retrospective cohort from the ARROW multisite registry; 315 participants aged 13–30 years, 6–12 months after primary ACLR (2013–2021), who completed the ACL-RSI and TSK-11. Exclusions were missing either questionnaire or history of contralateral/ipsilateral ACLR.
- Age groups were teen (<19 years; 72.7%) and adult (≥19 years; 27.4%); ACL-RSI cutoff of 77 defined unacceptable psychological readiness.
- Analyses included independent samples t-tests, Pearson correlations with Fisher’s z and Bonferroni correction (p < 0.010 for five correlations), and binary logistic regression with sex, age group, and months since surgery as covariates.
Limitations
- Stated: the teen group was older (mean 16.7 ± 1.3 years), limiting generalizability to younger children/early teens; multi-site rehabilitation protocols were not controlled; concomitant surgical procedures and surgical characteristics were not considered; registry limitations meant no actual return-to-sport outcomes, prior sports participation, or desire to RTS were captured; only total ACL-RSI scores were available, not subscales.
- Evident from the text: the retrospective registry design cannot establish causality between kinesiophobia and psychological readiness, and the lack of actual RTS outcomes makes clinical implications for return-to-sport clearance indirect.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
22 of 49 cited sources checked · 11 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Thorolfsson et al. (2023) reported a mean ACL-RSI score of 71 in a group of 347 adolescents with a mean age of 17.1 years at a similar post-operative timepoint.
“This trend is corroborated by the work of Thorolfsson et al. (2023) who reported a mean ACL-RSI score of 71 in a group of 347 adolescents with a mean age of 17.1 years at a similar post-operative timepoint (Thorolfsson et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Thorolfsson et al., 2023 source
Table 2 (Results; page not provided) identifies 347 adolescents with a mean age of 17.1 years. Table 4 (Results, Patient-reported outcome measurements; page not provided) reports a mean ACL-RSI score of 71.0 at eight months, but only 243 adolescents contributed ACL-RSI scores at that follow-up, not all 347. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
The findings align with previous studies in adult populations aged 16 to 40 years that reported associations between psychological readiness and kinesiophobia.
“These findings align with previous studies in adult populations aged 16 to 40 years, which have reported associations between psychological readiness and kinesiophobia (Sheridan et al., 2014; Lentz et al., 2015; Sonesson et al., 2017; Isaji et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Sheridan et al., 2014 source
- cites Lentz et al., 2015 source
- cites Sonesson et al., 2017 source
The Methods report participants aged 15–45, rather than a population restricted to ages 16–40. The Questionnaires section describes measures of expectations, motivation, satisfaction, and knee function; although the Discussion mentions psychological readiness, the passages found do not report an association between it and kinesiophobia (searched: kinesiophobia, fear of movement, fear of re-injury). (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
An athlete's psychological readiness is associated with their ability to return to sport after ACL reconstruction.
“In the context of ACLR, it has been well documented that an athlete’s psychological readiness is associated with their ability to RTS (Ardern et al., 2014; Czuppon et al., 2014; Fones et al., 2020; Welling et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites Ardern et al., 2014 source
- cites Czuppon et al., 2014 source
The Results (Psychological Variables) report associations between return to sport after ACL reconstruction and kinesiophobia and athletic confidence, supporting the core claim. The review calls the evidence weak, however, and the Discussion says few studies met its criteria; this does not support the citing sentence’s stronger description of the association as “well documented.” (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Fones et al., 2020 source
- Premisecitation
Patients with high kinesiophobia (TSK-11 ≥19) at the time of return to sport were 13 times more likely to suffer a graft rupture within 20 years of return to sport compared to those with lower kinesiophobia.
“The same authors reported that patients with high kinesiophobia (TSK-11 score of 19 or greater) at the time of RTS were 13 times more likely to suffer a graft rupture within 20 years of RTS compared to those with lower kinesiophobia (Paterno et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Paterno et al., 2018 source
The Results report that patients with TSK-11 scores ≥19 at return to sport were 13 times more likely to suffer an ipsilateral second ACL tear. The reported follow-up period was 24 months, not 20 years. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Kinesiophobia has been identified as a contributing factor for failure to return to sport.
“Finally, kinesiophobia has been identified by many as a contributing factor for failure to RTS (Ardern et al., 2013; Lentz et al., 2015; Nwachukwu et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
- Premisecitation
Patients with higher kinesiophobia (TSK-11 ≥17) are four times more likely to report lower physical activity levels (odds ratio 3.73; 95% CI, 0.98-14.23).
“Specifically, Paterno et al. (2018) reported that patients with higher kinesiophobia greater than or equal to 17 on the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) are four times more likely to report lower physical activity levels (odds ratio 3.73; 95% CI, 0.98–14.23)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Paterno et al., 2018 source
- Premisecitation
Other works have found age-related differences in psychological readiness to return to sport after ACLR, with younger patients reporting greater readiness.
“This is supported by other works that have found age-related differences in psychological readiness to RTS after ACLR with younger patients reporting greater readiness (Webster et al., 2018; Kostyun et al., 2021; Milewski et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Patients with higher kinesiophobia (TSK-11 ≥17) are six times more likely to have quadriceps strength asymmetry (odds ratio 6.0; 95% CI, 1.3-27.8).
“six times more likely to have quadriceps strength asymmetry (odds ratio 6.0; 95% CI, 1.3–27.8)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Paterno et al., 2018 source
- Study design and conductcitation
The TSK-11 has been validated for use in patients after ACL reconstruction.
“The TSK-11 has been validated for use in patients after ACLR (George et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites George et al., 2012 source
The Methods (page unavailable) describe the TSK-11 as a previously validated questionnaire used to assess patients after ACL reconstruction, and the Discussion reports associations with function in later rehabilitation. But the Introduction cautions that prior TSK validation studies may not apply directly to these patients; this study examines shortened versions rather than establishing that the full TSK-11 has been validated for this population. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Patients with higher kinesiophobia (TSK-11 ≥17) are seven times more likely to demonstrate hop test asymmetry (odds ratio 7.1; 95% CI, 1.5-33.0).
“seven times more likely to demonstrate hop test asymmetry (odds ratio 7.1; 95% CI, 1.5–33.0)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Paterno et al., 2018 source
- Premisecitation
Psychological and emotional responses to stressors differ between adults and adolescents.
“Psychological and emotional responses to stressors differ between adults and adolescents which may have contributed to these findings (Garnefski et al., 2002; Silvers et al., 2012; Deng et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Garnefski et al., 2002 source
- cites Silvers et al., 2012 source
- cites Deng et al., 2019 source
The Results (Behavioral Results; page unavailable) report differences between adolescents and adults in some emotional-regulation responses. However, the study used emotional pictures, not stressors, so it does not establish that their psychological and emotional responses to stressors differ. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Compared to adults, adolescents' cognitive appraisal of a situation is more affected by their current emotional state rather than through engaging in effective decision-making strategies.
“Compared to adults, adolescents’ cognitive appraisal of a situation is more affected by their current emotional state rather than through engaging in effective decision-making strategies (Garnefski et al., 2002; Silvers et al., 2012; Deng et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Garnefski et al., 2002 source
- cites Silvers et al., 2012 source
The General Discussion reports that younger adolescents were less successful than older participants at using cognitive reappraisal to reduce negative affect, with success stabilizing by late adolescence. It does not establish that adolescents’ appraisals are more driven by their current emotional state than adults’ appraisals, or test whether they engage in effective decision-making strategies; its results found no age-related difference in emotional reactivity. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Deng et al., 2019 source
The Present Study and Discussion sections describe adolescents as more emotionally reactive than adults, and the Discussion reports that adults were more effective at up-regulating emotion. The paper does not establish that adolescents’ appraisal of a situation is driven more by their current emotional state than by effective decision-making strategies; it did not test that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Participants with poor psychological readiness (ACL-RSI <77) reported significantly greater kinesiophobia (TSK-11 20.97 ± 4.72) than participants with acceptable psychological readiness (16.14 ± 3.92, p < 0.001, d = 2.81).
“Participants with poor psychological readiness reported significantly greater kinesiophobia (20.97 ± 4.72) as compared to participants with acceptable psychological readiness (16.14 ± 3.92, p < 0.001, d = 2.81).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The correlation between ACL-RSI and TSK-11 scores does not significantly differ between teens and young adults after ACL reconstruction (z = −1.49).
“with no significant difference in the correlation coefficients (z = −1.49)”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“the correlation coefficients for each age group did not significantly differ (z = −1.49)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
For every one-point increase in TSK-11 score, there was 28% increased odds of having an unacceptable ACL-RSI score.
“For every one-point increase in TSK-11 score, there was 28% increased odds of having an unacceptable ACL-RSI score.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Adults (≥19 years) are twice as likely as teens (<19 years) to report an unacceptable ACL-RSI score (<77) after ACL reconstruction.
“Adults were twice as likely as teens to report unacceptable psychological readiness.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“Additionally, adults were twice as likely to report an unacceptable ACL-RSI score.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
Months since surgery is not a significant covariate in the logistic regression model predicting unacceptable ACL-RSI score.
“Sex and time since surgery were not found to be significant covariates in the regression model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Across the whole cohort 6-12 months after primary ACL reconstruction, ACL-RSI and TSK-11 scores have a moderate inverse correlation (r = −0.56, p < 0.001).
“A moderate inverse correlation was observed between ACL-RSI and TSK-11 scores (r = −0.56, p < 0.001) such that greater psychological readiness was associated with lower levels of kinesiophobia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Sex is not a significant covariate in the logistic regression model predicting unacceptable ACL-RSI score.
“Sex and time since surgery were not found to be significant covariates in the regression model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For every one-point increase in TSK-11 score, there is a 28% increase in the odds of having an ACL-RSI score below the pass threshold (<77), controlling for age, sex, and months since surgery.
“Each one-point increase in kinesiophobia was associated with a 28% higher likelihood of reporting unacceptable psychological readiness.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“For every one-point greater increase in TSK-11 score there was a 28% increase in the odds of having an ACL-RSI score below the pass threshold, when controlling for age, sex and months since surgery.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
No sex differences were found in ACL-RSI or TSK-11 scores regardless of age.
“No sex differences were found in ACL-RSI or TSK-11 scores regardless of age.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In teens (13-18 years) 6-12 months after primary ACL reconstruction, ACL-RSI and TSK-11 scores are significantly negatively correlated (r = −0.59, p < 0.001).
“ACL Return-to-Sport after Injury Scale and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia scores were significantly correlated in both groups (teen: r = −0.59, p < 0.001; adult: r = −0.45, p < 0.001)”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“within each age group, ACL-RSI and TSK-11 total scores were significantly correlated (teen: r = −0.59, p = < 0.001; adult: r = −0.45, p = < 0.001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingcitation
48% of participants had unacceptable ACL-RSI scores based on the cutoff of 77.
“Overall, nearly half (48%) of participants indicated unacceptable ACL-RSI scores based on the cutoff of 77 reported by McPherson et al.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McPherson et al., 2019 source
- Findingown data
Greater psychological readiness was associated with lower kinesiophobia after ACLR regardless of age or sex.
“This study found that greater psychological readiness was associated with lower kinesiophobia after ACLR regardless of age or sex.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Overall, 47.9% of participants scored below the ACL-RSI pass threshold (<77), indicating poor psychological readiness.
“Overall, 47.9% scored below the ACL Return-to-Sport after Injury pass threshold.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“Overall, 47.9% of participants scored below the ACL-RSI pass threshold (<77), indicating poor psychological readiness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
In young adults (≥19 years) 6-12 months after primary ACL reconstruction, ACL-RSI and TSK-11 scores are significantly negatively correlated (r = −0.45, p < 0.001).
“ACL Return-to-Sport after Injury Scale and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia scores were significantly correlated in both groups (teen: r = −0.59, p < 0.001; adult: r = −0.45, p < 0.001)”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“within each age group, ACL-RSI and TSK-11 total scores were significantly correlated (teen: r = −0.59, p = < 0.001; adult: r = −0.45, p = < 0.001)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
No sex-based differences in the relationship between the ACL-RSI and the TSK-11 were observed.
“Finally, no sex-based differences in the relationship between the ACL-RSI and the TSK-11 were observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In teens and young adults 6-12 months after primary ACL reconstruction, greater psychological readiness is associated with lower kinesiophobia.
“Greater psychological readiness was associated with lower kinesiophobia in both teens and young adults.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
“A moderate negative correlation was observed between ACL-RSI and TSK-11 scores in both teens and young adults, indicating that greater psychological readiness was associated with lower levels of kinesiophobia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
- Findingown data
Young adult participants were twice as likely to report an unacceptable ACL-RSI score compared to teen participants (OR = 2.00, 95% CI [1.11, 3.61]).
“This study also found that young adult participants were twice as likely to report an unacceptable ACL-RSI score compared to teen participants (OR = 2.00, 95% CI [1.11, 3.61]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The mean age of the teen group in this study was 16.7 ± 1.3 years.
“Importantly, the mean age of the teen group in this study was 16.7 ± 1.3 years representing a “late teen” group of athletes (Butler et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
An increase in months since surgery is weakly correlated with greater psychological readiness (r = 0.17, p = 0.003).
“An increase in months since surgery was weakly correlated with greater psychological readiness (r = 0.17, p = 0.003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Psychological readiness to return to sport and kinesiophobia maintained a relationship across sexes.
“these findings suggest that psychological readiness to RTS and kinesiophobia maintained a relationship across sexes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Several papers have reported correlations between ACL-RSI and TSK-11 scores in the adult population after ACL reconstruction.
“Although psychological readiness and kinesiophobia are two unique constructs, several papers have reported correlations between ACL-RSI and TSK-11 scores in the adult population after ACLR (Kvist et al., 2013; Harput et al., 2017; Sala-Barat et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Only roughly half of athletes make a full return to sport within 1 year after ACL reconstruction.
“Sustaining an ACL tear typically results in surgical reconstruction followed by 6–12 months of rehabilitation with only roughly half of athletes making a full return to sport within 1 year after surgery (Ardern et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ardern et al., 2011 source
- Study design and conductown data
The study was not able to ascertain whether the athletes actually returned to their sport due to limitations in the registry.
“Due to limitations in the registry, we were not able to ascertain whether the athletes actually returned to their sport.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Psychological readiness and kinesiophobia are most relevant in the context of return to sport.
- Study design and conductcitation
The ACL-RSI cutoff of 77 was chosen because a score of 77 demonstrated 90% sensitivity in identifying those who went on to suffer a second ACL injury.
“This cutoff was chosen by the work of Mcpherson et al. who reported that a score of 77 points on the ACL-RSI demonstrated 90% sensitivity in identifying those who went on to suffer a second ACL injury (McPherson et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McPherson et al., 2019 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Health care providers may not adequately be addressing psychological constructs related to readiness to return to sport in patients after ACLR.
“Based on literature and the results presented in the current study, health care providers may not adequately be addressing psychological constructs related to readiness to RTS in patients after ACLR.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Despite differences in psychological and emotional responses between teens and adults, in this cohort psychological readiness and kinesiophobia maintained a relationship across different age groups.
“Despite differences in psychological and emotional responses between teens and adults, in our participants, psychological readiness and kinesiophobia maintained a relationship across different age groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The findings may not be generalizable to a younger athlete population due to the older age of the teen group.
“First, due to the older age of the teen group in this study, our findings may not be generalizable to a younger athlete population”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Females cite fear of re-injury as a reason for not returning to their prior level of sport participation more frequently than males after ACL reconstruction.
“Sex based differences in kinesiophobia after ACLR have also been reported with females citing fear of re-injury as a reason for not returning to their prior level of sport participation more frequently than males (Kvist et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kvist et al., 2005 source
- Premisecitation
Time from surgery is an important factor influencing psychological outcomes after ACL reconstruction, with greater mental readiness to return to sport observed at later post-operative time points.
“Additionally, time from surgery is another important factor influencing psychological outcomes after ACLR, with greater mental readiness to RTS observed at later post-operative time points (Kostyun et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kostyun et al., 2021 source
- Interpretationown data
The study's hypothesis that there would be an inverse relationship between psychological readiness and kinesiophobia after ACL reconstruction was supported.
“Our hypothesis, that there would be an inverse relationship between psychological readiness and kinesiophobia, was supported.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
At approximately 8 months after ACLR, these athletes were not psychologically ready to return to sport.
“This finding suggests that at approximately 8 months after ACLR, these athletes were not psychologically ready to RTS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Webster et al. reported mean ACL-RSI scores of 65 at an average of 12 months after primary ACLR in a slightly older group of athletes (mean age 28 ± 10 years).
“Similarly, in a slightly older group of athletes (mean age 28 ± 10 years), Webster et al. reported mean ACL-RSI scores of 65 at an average of 12 months after primary ACLR (Webster et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Webster et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 15
- Probably not a substantial claim. 15
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationKinesiophobia has been identified as a barrier to return to sport and a predictor of poor outcomes after ACL reconstruction in youth athletes.
“Kinesiophobia, often described as pain-related fear, fear of movement, and/or fear of reinjury, has also been identified as a barrier to RTS and a predictor of poor outcomes after ACLR in youth athletes (Lundberg et al., 2011; DiSanti et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Lundberg et al., 2011 source
The Introduction defines kinesiophobia in terms of fear of movement and reinjury, and the References list a study titled “Fear of re-injury: a hindrance for returning to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.” The review does not report that kinesiophobia predicts poor outcomes after ACL reconstruction in youth athletes; that population and predictive claim are unsupported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites DiSanti et al., 2018 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationSignificant negative correlations have been reported between ACL-RSI and TSK-11, ranging from weak to strong, suggesting that greater psychological readiness to return to sport may be associated with lower kinesiophobia.
“Significant negative correlations have been reported between the ACL-RSI and the TSK-11, ranging from weak to strong, suggesting that greater psychological readiness to RTS may be associated with lower kinesiophobia (Kvist et al., 2013; Harput et al., 2017; Slagers et al., 2017; Sala-Barat et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Kvist et al., 2013 source
- cites Harput et al., 2017 source
- cites Slagers et al., 2017 source
The Construct validity section reports a moderate negative correlation between ACL-RSI(NL) and TSK (r = −0.46), consistent with greater readiness being associated with less fear of movement. However, the Questionnaires section specifies that this study used a 17-item TSK, not TSK-11; it also reports one moderate correlation, not a range from weak to strong. The available correlation passage does not state a p-value. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationHigher kinesiophobia is associated with decreased hop performance, reduced quadriceps strength, and increased risk of second injury in youth athletes after ACL reconstruction.
“Higher kinesiophobia has also been associated with decreased hop performance, reduced quadriceps strength, and increased risk of second injury in youth athletes after ACLR (Paterno et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Paterno et al., 2018 source
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe ACL-RSI and TSK-11 are commonly used to assess psychological readiness and kinesiophobia after ACL reconstruction, respectively.
“The Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Return to Sport After Injury Scale (ACL-RSI) and the TSK-11 are commonly used to assess psychological readiness and kinesiophobia after ACLR, respectively (Woby et al., 2005; Webster et al., 2008; Webster and Feller, 2018; Cirrincione et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationPrior works have reported an interaction between the social environment and an athlete's motivation.
“This has been highlighted in prior works which have reported an interaction between the social environment and an athlete’s motivation (Podlog and Eklund, 2006; Hildingsson et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe average age of pubertal onset is reported at 10.8 years in females versus 12.9 years in males.
“The average age of pubertal onset is reported at 10.8 years in females versus 12.9 years in males (Aris et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Aris et al., 2022 source
The Results report 10.8 years for girls and 12.9 years for boys, but those figures are ages at peak height velocity (APHV), not directly measured ages of pubertal onset. The Methods (Primary Outcome) describe APHV as a marker of pubertal timing, so the claim preserves the numbers and sex comparison while treating a marker as the onset age itself. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAcross the cohort, the total ACL-RSI and TSK-11 scores averaged 73.42 ± 22.68 and 18.50 ± 4.92, respectively.
“Across the cohort, the total ACL-RSI and TSK-11 scores averaged 73.42 ± 22.68 and 18.50 ± 4.92, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataA total of 315 participants (54.3% female; 72.7% teens; 18.3 ± 3.3 years; 8.2 ± 1.9 months from surgery) were included for analysis.
“A total of 315 participants (54.3% female; 72.7% teens; 18.3 ± 3.3 years; 8.2 ± 1.9 months from surgery) were included for analysis (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataGreater kinesiophobia is associated with unacceptable psychological readiness (ACL-RSI <77) in patients 6-12 months after ACL reconstruction (Χ2(4) = 89.87, p < 0.001).
“the logistic regression indicated that a greater kinesiophobia was associated with an unacceptable psychological readiness (Χ2(4) = 89.87, p < 0.001; Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
FindingcitationThe mean ACL-RSI score was 73.4.
“with a mean ACL-RSI score of 73.4 (McPherson et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataSignificant age group differences were found in both ACL-RSI and TSK-11 scores, with teens reporting greater psychological readiness and reduced kinesiophobia compared to adults.
“significant age group differences were found in both ACL-RSI (mean difference: 14.0, p < 0.001, d = 0.64) and TSK-11 (mean difference: 1.6, p = 0.007, d = 0.32), with teens reporting overall greater psychological readiness and reduced levels of kinesiophobia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductreasoningThe outcomes of psychological readiness and kinesiophobia (ACL-RSI and TSK-11) were captured via standardized questionnaires and thus consistent across sites.
“However, the outcomes of psychological readiness and kinesiophobia (ACL-RSI and TSK-11) analyzed in the current study were captured via standardized questionnaires and thus consistent across sites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningA Bonferroni correction was applied to account for multiple comparisons across the five correlations, adjusting the significance threshold to p < 0.010.
“A Bonferroni correction was applied to account for multiple comparisons across the five correlations, adjusting the significance threshold to p < 0.010.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationLower psychological readiness at the time of return to sport is associated with a higher risk of recurrent ACL injuries in athletes aged 20 years and younger, while no such relationship has been reported in athletes over the age of 20.
“Moreover, lower psychological readiness at the time of RTS has been associated with a higher risk of recurrent ACL injuries in athletes aged 20 years and younger, while no such relationship has been reported in athletes over the age of 20 (McPherson et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McPherson et al., 2019 source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown dataDue to registry limitations, the study team only had access to the total ACL-RSI scores.
“Lastly, due to registry limitations, the study team only had access to the total ACL-RSI scores.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationDifferences in perceptions of re-injury related risk between males and females may be an influential factor on return-to-sport decision making and may be one reason why females report lower return-to-sport rates than males.
“It has been suggested that differences in perceptions of re-injury related risk between males and females may be an influential factor on RTS decision making and may be one reason why females report lower RTS rates than males (Siegel, 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Siegel, 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenThe multi-site study presented difficulties in controlling rehabilitation protocols used across the different treatment centers.
“Next, this was a multi-site study which presented difficulties in controlling rehabilitation protocols used across the different treatment centers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenThe study did not consider concomitant surgical procedures and other surgical characteristics.
“This study did not consider concomitant surgical procedures and other surgical characteristics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductown dataData were collected as part of separate IRB-approved research studies at each site and aggregated in an IRB-approved registry.
“Data were collected as a part of separate Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved research studies at each site, then a limited data set from each site was aggregated in an IRB approved registry housed and managed by study team members at the University of Virginia (HSR 230335).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductcitationThe ACL-RSI has demonstrated high validity and internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.96).
“The ACL-RSI has demonstrated high validity and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.96) (Webster et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Webster et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductown dataThe study did not capture information about prior sports participation or the desire to return to sport.
“Additionally, we did not capture information about prior sports participation or the desire to RTS, which may have influenced study findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductcitationThe TSK-11 has demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.79) and good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.81).
“The tool has demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.79) and good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.81) (Woby et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Woby et al., 2005 source
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe variation in rehabilitation approaches, the lack of concomitant surgical data, and the absence of actual RTS outcomes may have influenced psychological responses and thus weaken the interpretation of study findings.
“The variation in rehabilitation approaches, the lack of concomitant surgical data, and the absence of actual RTS outcomes may have influenced psychological responses and thus weaken the interpretation of study findings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Psychological readiness and kinesiophobia are most relevant in the context of return to sport.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataThe significant contribution of covariates in improving the overall model suggests that broad measures of psychological response after ACL reconstruction are helpful as part of clinical decision making, but without evaluation of specific constructs, implementing effective interventions may be challenging.
“While a relationship was found in this study, the significant contribution of covariates in improving the overall model suggests that while broad measures of psychological response after ACLR are helpful as part of clinical decision making, without evaluation of specific constructs, implementing effective interventions may be challenging.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
It is unknown whether ACL-RSI and TSK-11 correlations exist in teens (13–18 years) after ACL reconstruction.
“however, it is unknown if they are associated in teens after ACL reconstruction.”
“However, we do not know whether these correlations exist in teens (13–18 chronological years of age).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Psychological changes related to growth and development affect the assessment of psychological readiness and kinesiophobia for return-to-sport decision-making in teens.
“Psychological changes related to growth and development should be considered when assessing these constructs for RTS decision-making in teens.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Youth athletes are at the highest risk of ACL injury recurrence.
“Given that youth athletes are at the highest risk of ACL injury recurrence, and with the rising concerns related to athlete mental health,(Daley and Reardon, 2024) it is imperative that we gain a deeper understanding of the relationship between these two psychological constructs in this population.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Psychological readiness and kinesiophobia are most relevant in the context of return to sport.
“This is a key limitation given that both psychological readiness and kinesiophobia are most relevant in the context of RTS.”
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentχ²(4) = 89.87reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“Χ2(4) = 89.87, p < .001”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,600
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348 · Cited by 11,929
Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: A basic review
Taylor, R. (1990) · Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography · doi:10.1177/875647939000600106 · Cited by 2,390
Ardern, C. L., Webster, K. E., Taylor, N. F., & Feller, J. A. (2011) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.2010.076364 · Cited by 1,383
Psychometric properties of the TSK-11: A shortened version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia
Woby, S. R., Roach, N. K., Urmston, M., & Watson, P. J. (2005) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2005.05.029 · Cited by 923
Webster, K. E., Feller, J. A., & Lambros, C. (2008) · Physical Therapy in Sport · doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2007.09.003 · Cited by 823
Kvist, J., Ek, A., Sporrstedt, K., & Good, L. (2005) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-004-0591-8 · Cited by 778
Christie, D., & Viner, R. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7486.301 · Cited by 758
Ardern, C. L., Taylor, N. F., Feller, J. A., Whitehead, T. S., & Webster, K. E. (2013) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546513489284 · Cited by 660
GARNEFSKI, N., LEGERSTEE, J., KRAAIJ, V., VAN DEN KOMMER, T., & TEERDS, J. (2002) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1006/jado.2002.0507 · Cited by 561
Silvers, J. A., McRae, K., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Gross, J. J., Remy, K. A., & Ochsner, K. N. (2012) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0028297 · Cited by 522
Ardern, C. L., Österberg, A., Tagesson, S., Gauffin, H., Webster, K. E., & Kvist, J. (2014) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2014-093842 · Cited by 489
Paterno, M. V., Flynn, K., Thomas, S., & Schmitt, L. C. (2018) · Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach · doi:10.1177/1941738117745806 · Cited by 338
Czuppon, S., Racette, B. A., Klein, S. E., & Harris-Hayes, M. (2014) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2012-091786 · Cited by 328
Webster, K. E., Nagelli, C. V., Hewett, T. E., & Feller, J. A. (2018) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546518773757 · Cited by 317
Lentz, T. A., Zeppieri, G., George, S. Z., Tillman, S. M., Moser, M. W., Farmer, K. W., & Chmielewski, T. L. (2015) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546514559707 · Cited by 297
Forsdyke, D., Smith, A., Jones, M. A., & Gledhill, A. (2016) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2015-094850 · Cited by 294
A systematic review of social support in youth sport
Sheridan, D., Coffee, P., & Lavallee, D. (2014) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2014.931999 · Cited by 284
McPherson, A. L., Feller, J. A., Hewett, T. E., & Webster, K. E. (2019) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546518825258 · Cited by 269
A longitudinal investigation of competitive athletes' return to sport following serious injury
Podlog, L., & Eklund, R. C. (2006) · Journal of Applied Sport Psychology · doi:10.1080/10413200500471319 · Cited by 267
Nwachukwu, B. U., Adjei, J., Rauck, R. C., Chahla, J., Okoroha, K. R., Verma, N. N., Allen, A. A., & Williams, R. J. (2019) · Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/2325967119845313 · Cited by 252
Psychosocial Responses During Different Phases of Sport-Injury Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Study
Clement, D., Arvinen‐Barrow, M., & Fetty, T. (2014) · Journal of Athletic Training · doi:10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.52 · Cited by 241
Morrey, M. A., Stuart, M. J., Smith, A. M., & Wiese‐Bjornstal, D. M. (1999) · Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine · doi:10.1097/00042752-199904000-00004 · Cited by 226
Pain-related fear: a critical review of the related measures
Lundberg, M., Grimby-Ekman, A., Verbunt, J., & Simmonds, M. J. (2011) · Pain Research and Treatment · doi:10.1155/2011/494196 · Cited by 211
Webster, K. E., & Feller, J. A. (2018) · Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/2325967118763763 · Cited by 211
The Context of Emotional Responses to Athletic Injury: A Qualitative Analysis
Johnston, L. H., & Carroll, D. (1998) · Journal of Sport Rehabilitation · doi:10.1123/jsr.7.3.206 · Cited by 179
Sonesson, S., Kvist, J., Ardern, C., Österberg, A., & Silbernagel, K. G. (2017) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-016-4294-8 · Cited by 166
Kvist, J., Österberg, A., Gauffin, H., Tagesson, S., Webster, K., & Ardern, C. (2013) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01438.x · Cited by 150
Welling, W., Benjaminse, A., LEMMINK, K. A. P. M., & Gokeler, A. (2020) · The Knee · doi:10.1016/j.knee.2020.03.007 · Cited by 138
Psychological Aspects of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Ardern, C. L., Kvist, J., & Webster, K. E. (2015) · Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine · doi:10.1053/j.otsm.2015.09.006 · Cited by 135
George, S. Z., Lentz, T. A., Zeppieri, G., Lee, D., & Chmielewski, T. L. (2012) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0b013e31822363f4 · Cited by 122
DiSanti, J., Lisee, C., Erickson, K., Bell, D., Shingles, M., & Kuenze, C. (2018) · Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.8277 · Cited by 121
Self-citationCoronado, R. A., Bird, M. L., Hoy, E., Huston, L. J., Spindler, K. P., & Archer, K. R. (2017) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/0269215517728562 · Cited by 98
Harput, G., Tok, D., Ulusoy, B., Eraslan, L., Yildiz, T. I., Turgut, E., Demirci, S., Duzgun, I., Tunay, V. B., Baltaci, G., et al. (2017) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-016-4288-6 · Cited by 62
Slagers, A. J., Reininga, I. H. F., & van den Akker-Scheek, I. (2017) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2016.1167230 · Cited by 57
Fones, L., Kostyun, R. O., Cohen, A. D., & Pace, J. L. (2020) · Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/2325967120964471 · Cited by 51
Webster, K. E., & Feller, J. A. (2022) · Journal of Athletic Training · doi:10.4085/1062-6050-0543.21 · Cited by 49
Analysis of early-life growth and age at pubertal onset in US children
Aris, I. M., Perng, W., Dabelea, D., Ganiban, J. M., Liu, C., Marceau, K., Robertson, O. C., Hockett, C. W., Mihalopoulos, N. L., Kong, X., et al. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.46873 · Cited by 47
Kostyun, R. O., Burland, J. P., Kostyun, K. J., Milewski, M. D., & Nissen, C. W. (2021) · Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine · doi:10.1097/jsm.0000000000000751 · Cited by 45
Deng, X., Sang, B., Ku, Y., & Sai, L. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42139-4 · Cited by 40
Sala-Barat, E., Álvarez-Díaz, P., Alentorn-Geli, E., Webster, K. E., Cugat, R., & Tomás-Sabado, J. (2020) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-019-05517-z · Cited by 37
Milewski, M. D., Traver, J. L., Coene, R. P., Williams, K., Sugimoto, D., Kramer, D. E., Kocher, M. S., Micheli, L. J., Yen, Y.-M., & Christino, M. A. (2023) · Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/23259671231166012 · Cited by 36
Mental Health in the Youth Athlete
Daley, M., & Reardon, C. L. (2023) · Clinics in Sports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.csm.2023.06.003 · Cited by 36
Isaji, Y., Uchino, S., Inada, R., & Saito, H. (2024) · Physical Therapy in Sport · doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.07.003 · Cited by 27
Validation of the ACL-RSI Scale in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients
Cirrincione, P. M., Gross, P. W., Matsuzaki, Y., Johnson, M. A., Nagra, K. K., Green, D. W., & Fabricant, P. D. (2023) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/03635465231191778 · Cited by 23
Thorolfsson, B., Piussi, R., Snaebjornsson, T., Karlsson, J., Samuelsson, K., Beischer, S., Thomeé, R., & Hamrin Senorski, E. (2023) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-023-07623-5 · Cited by 15
Apples to Oranges: Inconsistencies in Defining and Classifying Youth Sport Populations
Butler, L., DiSanti, J. S., Sugimoto, D., Hines, D. M., Bel, M. J. D., & Oliver, G. D. (2022) · Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine · doi:10.1097/jsm.0000000000001038 · Cited by 14
Self-citationHildingsson, M., Fitzgerald, U. T., & Alricsson, M. (2018) · Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation · doi:10.12965/jer.1836030.015 · Cited by 13
Aizawa, J., Hirohata, K., Ohji, S., Mitomo, S., Ohmi, T., Koga, H., & Yagishita, K. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics · doi:10.1002/jeo2.12004 · Cited by 10
Siegel, M. G. (2024) · Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2023.12.020 · Cited by 6
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
D’Ambrosi, R., Carrozzo, A., Monaco, E., Meena, A., Sconfienza, L. M., Herbst, E., Abermann, E., & Fink, C. (2025) · Sports Medicine - Open · doi:10.1186/s40798-025-00962-2 · Cited by 6
Cuando el dolor paraliza: análisis del programa ProperDual en deportistas con dolor crónico
Alcántara, M. G., Delgado-Plasencia, L. J., González-Benítez, N., & Aguilar, D. L. (2026) · Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte · doi:10.6018/cpd.671971
“IT’S OKAY. JUST TAKE IT DAY BY DAY.” PSYCHOLOGICAL RECOVERY SUPPORT AND ATHLETE REHABILITATION
Halpern, J. (2026) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/d2bh-1m55
Studi Fenomenologis: Dinamika Motivasi Atlet Bola Basket Pasca-Hiatus Dua Tahun
Putri, A. N. A., & Jannah, M. (2026) · Gelanggang Olahraga Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani dan Olahraga (JPJO) · doi:10.31539/y27zng33
Gąska, A. A., Gutkowska, M., Jabłońska, J., Wasik, J., Armuła, M., Bongage, C., Piechowiak, A., Napieraj, F., Herc, B. P., & Tesla, M. (2026) · Quality in Sport · doi:10.12775/qs.2026.63.73259
Sports Injuries and Mental Health in Child and Adolescent Athletes: A Systematic Review
Gil-Caselles, L., & Zafra, A. O. (2026) · Children · doi:10.3390/children13081076
Li, J., & Geng, S. (2026) · Indian Journal of Orthopaedics · doi:10.1007/s43465-026-01927-7
Yadav, A., Mishra, P. D. A., Goyal, P. D. B., Swami, D. H., Saini, D. A., & Bhatnagar, G. (2026) · Genetics and Molecular Research · doi:10.4238/prc10672
Botutihe, R. P. (2026) · Emik Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial · doi:10.46918/emik.v9i1.3179
Metadata
- Authors
- Butler, L., Baez, S., Walker, C., Roman, D., Douthit, T., Kuenze, C., Ulman, S., & ARROW
- Affiliations
- Florida International University (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Arkansas Children's Hospital (US)
- Connecticut Children's Medical Center (US)
- Andrews Institute for Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine (US)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Scottish Rite Freemasonry (US)
- Corresponding author
- Butler, Lauren
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2025-10-10
- Volume
- 16
- Pages
- 1623398-1623398
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12549314
- OpenAlex
- W4415044819
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation
- AO North America
- Arthrex
- AlloSource
- Stryker
- American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine
- JRF Ortho
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Keywords
- psychological readiness, kinesiophobia, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, return to sport, adolescents, young adults, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, ACL rehabilitation, age differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review