Cited by 72Diabetes Treatment and ManagementFrailty in Older AdultsDiabetes Management and Research

The impact of frailty on the effectiveness and safety of intensive glucose control and blood pressure-lowering therapy for people with type 2 diabetes: results from the ADVANCE trial

Open access
Nguyen, Tu N., Harris, Katie, Woodward, Mark, Chalmers, John, Cooper, Mark, Hamet, Pavel, Harrap, Stephen, Heller, Simon +9 more·2021·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a frailty index (FI) and explore the relationship of frailty to subsequent adverse outcomes on the effectiveness and safety of more intensive control of both blood glucose and blood pressure (BP), among participants with type 2 diabetes in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the effectiveness and safety of intensive glucose control and BP intervention according to frailty (defined as FI >0.21) status. The primary outcomes were macro- and microvascular events. The secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, severe hypoglycemia, and discontinuation of BP treatment due to hypotension/dizziness. RESULTS: There were 11,140 participants (mean age, 65.8 years; 42.5% women, 25.7% frail). Frailty was an independent predictor of all primary outcomes and secondary outcomes. The effect of intensive glucose treatment on primary outcomes showed some evidence of attenuation in the frail: hazard ratios for combined major macro- and microvascular events 1.03 (95% CI 0.90–1.19) in the frail versus 0.84 (95% CI 0.74–0.94) in the nonfrail (P = 0.02). A similar trend was observed with BP intervention. Severe hypoglycemia rates (per 1,000 person-years) were higher in the frail: 8.39 (6.15–10.63) vs. 4.80 (3.84–5.76) in nonfrail (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in discontinuation of BP treatment between frailty groups. CONCLUSIONS: It was possible to retrospectively estimate frailty in a trial population, and this FI identified those at higher risk of poor outcomes. Participants with frailty had some attenuation of benefit from intensive glucose-lowering and BP-lowering treatments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc20-2664

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, T. N., Harris, K., Woodward, M., Chalmers, J., Cooper, M., Hamet, P., Harrap, S., Heller, S., MacMahon, S., Mancia, G., Marre, M., Poulter, N., Rogers, A., Williams, B., Zoungas, S., Chow, C. K., & Lindley, R. I.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • The George Institute for Global Health (GB)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Université Paris Cité (FR)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Nguyen, Tu N.
  • Lindley, Richard I.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2021-05-25
Volume
44
Issue
7
Pages
1622-1629
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W3164577379
Cited by
72
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 1
FWCI
8.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0514-10011)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
frailty, frailty index, type 2 diabetes, tight glycemic control, blood pressure-lowering therapy, ADVANCE trial, severe hypoglycemia, microvascular complications, cardiovascular mortality, treatment discontinuation, older adults
MeSH terms
Frailty, Aged, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review