Cited by 73Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsEnzyme Structure and FunctionReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Cryo-EM: the resolution revolution and drug discovery

Open access
de Oliveira, Taiana Maia, van Beek, Lotte, Shilliday, Fiona, Debreczeni, Judit É., Phillips, Chris·2021·SLAS DISCOVERY

Abstract

Single-particle cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has been elevated to the mainstream of structural biology propelled by technological advancements in numerous fronts, including imaging analysis and the development of direct electron detectors. The drug discovery field has watched with (initial) skepticism and wonder at the progression of the technique and how it revolutionized the molecular understanding of previously intractable targets. This article critically assesses how cryo-EM has impacted drug discovery in diverse therapeutic areas. Targets that have been brought into the realm of structure-based drug design by cryo-EM and are thus reviewed here include membrane proteins like the GABA A receptor, several TRP channels, and G protein-coupled receptors, and multiprotein complexes like the ribosomes, the proteasome, and eIF2B. We will describe these studies highlighting the achievements, challenges, and caveats.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2472555220960401

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. U.S.A. 2019, 116, 1591-1596.
  2. Brickley, S. G.; Franks, N. P.; Wisden, W. Modulation of GABAA Receptor Function and Sleep. Curr. Opin. Physiol. 2018, 2, 51-57.
  3. Scapin, G., Patel, D., Arnold, E., Eds.; NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology; Springer Netherlands: Amsterdam, 2015; pp 1-18.
  4. U.S.A. 2019, 116, 9318-9323.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Oliveira, T. M., van Beek, L., Shilliday, F., Debreczeni, J. É., & Phillips, C.
Affiliations
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
SLAS DISCOVERY
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
17-31
ISSN
2472-5552 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3090889851
Cited by
73
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLAS DISCOVERY (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
cryo-electron microscopy, drug discovery, structure-based drug design, membrane proteins, GABAA receptor, TRP channels, G protein-coupled receptors, ribosome, proteasome, eIF2B, protein complexes, direct electron detectors
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Structure-Activity Relationship, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review