Cited by 745Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyEpilepsy research and treatment

Beyond classical benzodiazepines: novel therapeutic potential of GABAA receptor subtypes

Open access
Rudolph, Uwe, Knoflach, Frédéric·2011·Nature Reviews Drug Discovery

Abstract

GABAA (γ-aminobutyric acid, type A) receptors are a family of ligand-gated ion channels that are essential for the regulation of central nervous system function. Benzodiazepines — which non-selectively target GABAA receptors containing the α1, α2, α3 or α5 subunits — have been in clinical use for decades and are still among the most widely prescribed drugs for the treatment of insomnia and anxiety disorders. However, their use is limited by side effects and the risk of drug dependence. In the past decade, the identification of separable key functions of GABAA receptor subtypes suggests that receptor subtype-selective compounds could overcome the limitations of classical benzodiazepines; furthermore, they might be valuable for novel indications such as chronic pain, depression, schizophrenia, cognitive enhancement and stroke.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrd3502

Cites

111 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rudolph, U., & Knoflach, F.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
Corresponding author
Rudolph, Uwe
Venue
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Published
2011-07-29
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
685-697
ISSN
  • 1474-1776 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-1784
OpenAlex
W2013775967
Cited by
733
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 38
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH087829, R01MH080006, R03MH085149, MH087829, MH085149, MH080006)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA027051, DA026578, R03DA026578, R03DA027051)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM086448, GM086448)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
Keywords
GABAA receptor, benzodiazepines, GABAA receptor subtypes, ligand-gated ion channels, chronic pain, depression, schizophrenia, cognitive enhancement, stroke, drug addiction
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Animals, Anxiety Disorders, Benzodiazepines, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Mutation, Receptors, GABA-A, Schizophrenia, Nootropic Agents, GABA Modulators, Substance-Related Disorders, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review