The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thinking Clearly About Correlations and Causation: Graphical Causal Models for Observational Data
Open accessAbstract
Correlation does not imply causation; but often, observational data are the only option, even though the research question at hand involves causality. This article discusses causal inference based on observational data, introducing readers to graphical causal models that can provide a powerful tool for thinking more clearly about the interrelations between variables. Topics covered include the rationale behind the statistical control of third variables, common procedures for statistical control, and what can go wrong during their implementation. Certain types of third variables—colliders and mediators—should not be controlled for because that can actually move the estimate of an association away from the value of the causal effect of interest. More subtle variations of such harmful control include using unrepresentative samples, which can undermine the validity of causal conclusions, and statistically controlling for mediators. Drawing valid causal inferences on the basis of observational data is not a mechanistic procedure but rather always depends on assumptions that require domain knowledge and that can be more or less plausible. However, this caveat holds not only for research based on observational data, but for all empirical research endeavors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532 · cited 1×
“Both old and newer common approaches to estimating the remaining (direct) effect after accounting for a mediator (e.g., Baron & Kenny, 1986; Hayes, 2009) rely on statistical control of the mediating variable, but such approaches can introduce endogenous selection bias (Elwert & Winship, 2014).”
BackgroundMissing data: our view of the state of the art
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.147 · Cited by 11,638 · cited 1×
“Schafer and Graham (2002) have provided an introduction to the management of missing data for psychologists.”
Background(1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,252
Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium
Hayes, A. F. (2009) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750903310360 · Cited by 9,757 · cited 1×
“Both old and newer common approaches to estimating the remaining (direct) effect after accounting for a mediator (e.g., Baron & Kenny, 1986; Hayes, 2009) rely on statistical control of the mediating variable, but such approaches can introduce endogenous selection bias (Elwert & Winship, 2014).”
BackgroundEstimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies
Rubin, D. B. (1974) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037350 · Cited by 9,436 · cited 1×
“A solid rule of thumb is that researchers should not control for such posttreatment variables (Rosenbaum, 1984; Rubin, 1974).”
BackgroundCausation, Prediction, and Search
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (2001) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1754.001.0001 · Cited by 4,521
Causal diagrams for empirical research
PEARL, J. (1995) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/82.4.669 · Cited by 2,355 · cited 1×
“They were developed primarily by the computer scientist Judea Pearl (e.g., Pearl, 1995; see Pearl, Glymour, & Jewell, 2016, for an introduction) and share many features with structural equation models (SEMs).1 DAGs offer an intuitive approach for thinking about causal structures.”
MethodWhy Propensity Scores Should Not Be Used for Matching
King, G., & Nielsen, R. (2019) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2019.11 · Cited by 1,706 · cited 1×
“The use of propensity scores for matching is controversial, and critics have indicated that other procedures might be preferable (King & Nielsen, 2016).”
BackgroundThe theoretical status of latent variables.
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.2.203 · Cited by 1,566
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2010) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.24.2.3 · Cited by 1,566
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Mohan K., 2013, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26 (NIPS 2013), 1277
- Robins J. M., 1999, Computation, Causation, & Discovery, 305
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,001
Code Comprehension Confounders: A Study of Intelligence and Personality
Wagner, S., & Wyrich, M. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2021.3127131 · Cited by 8
“One issue is that “carefully crafted language will not prevent readers–let alone the public–from jumping to causal conclusions” [36].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialCollective Rhythm as an Emergent Property During Human Social Coordination
Farrera, A., & Ramos‐Fernández, G. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.772262 · Cited by 10
“The assumptions underlying this argument are presented in a simple causal model (Rohrer, 2018) below.”
BackgroundTwenge, J. M., & Hamilton, J. L. (2022) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103696 · Cited by 10
Perceptions of Pay Satisfaction and Pay Justice: Two Sides of the Same Coin?
Valet, P. (2023) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-022-03059-5 · Cited by 20
“In the language of modern causal analysis and directed acyclic graphs, I only controlled for variables that lie on an open backdoor path (Elwert & Winship, 2014; Rohrer, 2018).”
MethodOrona, G. A., Eccles, J., Zitzmann, S., Fischer, C., & Arum, R. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102206 · Cited by 11
There are no shortcuts to theory
Devezer, B. (2024) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x23002169 · Cited by 8
Caprara, G. V., & Vecchione, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.038 · Cited by 9
Kinds of individuals defined by patterns of variables
Kagan, J. (2018) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s095457941800055x · Cited by 8
“A number of scholars who are sophisticated in statistics have criticized the practice of controlling for sources of heterogeneity in order to assess the contribution of a single variable to an outcome (Achen, 2005; Kraemer, 2015; Rohrer, 2018; Spector & Brannick, 2013; Torrey & Yolken, 2018).”
BackgroundThe APC-Effect: Stratification in Open Access PublishingPreprint
Klebel, T., & Ross‐Hellauer, T. (2022) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/w5szk · Cited by 8
A Systematic Review and Taxonomy of Neuroticism Interventions for the General PublicPreprint
Wright, A. J., Haehner, P., Hopwood, C. J., & Bleidorn, W. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/jy3eb · Cited by 11
A Guide to Causal Inference in Life-Event Studies
Lawes, M., West, S. G., & Eid, M. (2025) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459241302015 · Cited by 10
“The hypothesized causal structure can be specified using directed acyclic graphs (DAGs; for a nontechnical introduction, see Rohrer, 2018).”
Ren, Q., Yang, T., Wang, Y., Lui, S. S. Y., & Chan, R. C. K. (2025) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbae172 · Cited by 7
“55,58 However, it is practically impossible for DAG to include all potential variables and confounders, 45,62 therefore the DAG results must be interpreted with caution.”
Bi, K., Merrin, G. J., Li, T., Sun, X., Chai, Y., Lu, Z., & Chen, S. (2025) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459251326571 · Cited by 7
“Recent methodological advancements in causal inference (Rubin, 2005; for introductory texts for psychologists, see Grosz et al., 2024; Rohrer, 2018) that are commonly applied in biostatistics and econometrics have provided researchers analyzing observational data with more effective tools to…”
InfluentialCausal inference: Principles unifying experimental and observational accounts
Waldorp, L., Schutzeichel, F., & de Jong, P. J. (2025) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/09593543251325506 · Cited by 7
“If there is no dependence in any of the values of L between A and B , then the correct inference obtains that A does not cause B here (Pearl, 2000; see also Rohrer, 2018 for a discussion on how to cope with this central problem of observational data).”
Causality and ability beliefs: An introduction to confounders and colliders
Al‐Hoorie, A. H., & Hiver, P. V. (2025) · Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.14746/ssllt.48231 · Cited by 8
Kratz, F., & Brüderl, J. (2025) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcaf038 · Cited by 10
Marchetti, I., Koster, E. H. W., & Dul, J. (2025) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102689 · Cited by 10
Ecospirituality Predicts Pro-Environmental Outcomes Across Cultures
Billet, M. I., & Baimel, A. (2026) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/00139165261421073 · Cited by 9
“One way to approach unconfounding is by using directed acyclic graphs (DAGs, Pearl, 2000; Rohrer, 2018).”
Keith Hayes' experience-producing drives: An appreciation and extension
Bouchard, T. J., & Johnson, W. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110082 · Cited by 8
Formal models for the study of the relationship between fluctuating asymmetry and fitness in humans
Farrera, A. (2022) · American Journal of Biological Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.24588 · Cited by 7
“, linear, additive relationships) of said relationship (Rohrer, 2018).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialYu, S., Assor, A., Yu, H., & Wang, Q. (2022) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102245 · Cited by 8
Father trait anger: Associations with father–infant bonding and subsequent parenting stress
Francis, L. M., Youssef, G. J., Greenwood, C. J., Enticott, P. G., Curtis, A., Graeme, L. G., Mansour, K. A., Olsson, C. A., Skouteris, H., Milgrom, J., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1114084 · Cited by 7
“Covariates were included where they could theoretically cause both the predictor and outcome (Rohrer, 2018).”
BackgroundOn causal structural learning algorithms: Oracles’ simulations and considerations
Farnia, L. L., Alibegovic, M., & Cruickshank, E. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110694 · Cited by 7
U.S. States’ COVID-19 physical distancing policies and working-age adult mental health outcomes
Monnat, S. M., Wheeler, D. C., Wiemers, E., Sun, Y., Sun, X., Wolf, D. A., & Montez, J. K. (2023) · Preventive Medicine Reports · doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102370 · Cited by 7
Tassang, A. E., Guoqing, S., Akintunde, T. Y., Muhideen, S., Isangha, S. O., Adedeji, A., & Musa, T. H. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20361 · Cited by 7
“Future studies could use the research objectives in other settings to make causal inferences using a longitudinal approach [84,85].”
BackgroundBeaudoin, M. E., Jones, K. M., Jerome, B., Martinez, D., George, T., & Pandža, N. B. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1335864 · Cited by 7
“Of note, interpretations of causality will be difficult and will require statistical control of multiple variables (see Rohrer, 2018) and mediational analyses.”
BackgroundPolarized framing of scientific uncertainty during COVID-19 pandemic in Morocco
Zag, H., & Mifdal, M. (2024) · Atlantic Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/15456870.2024.2370274 · Cited by 8
“Moreover, non-experts frequently conflate correlation with causality (Aldrich, 1995; Rohrer, 2018).”
What Makes People High in Openness to Experience Happy? The Mediating Effect of Arts Engagement
Manolika, M., & Jacobsen, T. (2024) · Empirical Studies of the Arts · doi:10.1177/02762374241267934 · Cited by 7
“According to Rohrer (2018), however, “ an alternative to statistical adjustment is available: control by design ” (p. 34 ) or, to put it another way, future studies can consider the confounding effects of genetic background by including monozygotic twins (Gustavson et al., 2021).”
Sleep, emotional supportiveness, and socially straining behavior: A multidimensional approach
Kane, H. S., & Križan, Z. (2020) · Sleep Health · doi:10.1016/j.sleh.2020.06.010 · Cited by 7
“However, this analysis may be overly conservative, as psychological health factors are likely causal mediators of these associations.(40) Participants with missing covariate data were not included in these analyses.”
BackgroundConceptual and Historical Perspectives
Cloninger, S. C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.004 · Cited by 8
The five factor model and infidelity: Beyond the broad domains
van Zyl, C. J. J. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110553 · Cited by 11
Ömeroğulları, M., & Gläser‐Zikuda, M. (2021) · Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung · doi:10.1007/s35834-021-00314-6 · Cited by 7
“Auch wenn die getrennte Darstellung der beiden Modelle mit und ohne zentrale Kovariaten die Möglichkeit eröffnet bestimmte Drittvariableneffekte zu prüfen, wird in der Literatur auch diskutiert diese gar nicht zu kontrollieren (Rohrer 2018).”
BackgroundWilliams, M. N., & Marshall-Edwards, S. (2021) · Current Issues in Personality Psychology · doi:10.5114/cipp.2021.110948 · Cited by 10
“Alternatively, careful specification of plausible confounding and collider variables in a graphical causal model may permit the estimation of causal effects using observational data (see Rohrer, 2018).”
BackgroundAffective Theory of Mind in Late Adulthood: The Role of Emotion Complexity and Social Relatedness
Stutesman, M. G., & Frye, D. A. (2022) · Experimental Aging Research · doi:10.1080/0361073x.2022.2137359 · Cited by 7
“Caution interpreting the results and drawing conclusions should also be taken because the observed findings may be due to endogenous selection bias in the sample, leading to spurious associations or reduced ability to detect real associations (Rohrer, 2018).”
ResultA new look at the relations between attachment and intelligence
Giudice, M. D., & Haltigan, J. D. (2022) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2022.101054 · Cited by 8
How Partisanship Matters: A Panel Study on the Democratic Outcomes of Perceived Dirty Campaigning
Reiter, F., & Matthes, J. (2022) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.v10i4.5672 · Cited by 7
“…“back‐door paths” which may influence the association between the variables of interest, we purposefully controlled for demographics (age, gender, educational level), ideology, and perceived civil nega‐ tive campaigning (Rohrer, 2018; for complete details see Supplementary File, Table A3).”
BackgroundChain graph reduction into power chain graphs
Franco, V. R., Barros, G. W. F., Wiberg, M., & Laros, J. A. (2022) · Quantitative and Computational Methods in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.5964/qcmb.8383 · Cited by 7
Garcea, F., Blanco, G., Croci, A., Lamberti, F., Mamone, R., Ricupero, R., Morra, L., & Allamano, P. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-26180-4 · Cited by 8
Valuing Versus Having: The Contrary Roles of Valuing and Having Money and Prestige on Well-Being
Pfund, G. N., Willroth, E. C., Mroczek, D. K., & Hill, P. L. (2023) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506231166048 · Cited by 7
“The current analyses will account for age, sex, marital status, and household size based on recommendations to control for variables that could influence both predictors and outcomes (Rohrer, 2018).”
MethodLee, H. R., Tang, X., Alvarez-Vargas, D., Yang, J. S., Bailey, D. H., Simpkins, S. D., Safavian, N. S., Gaspard, H., Salmela‐Aro, K., Moeller, J., et al. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04871-z · Cited by 8
“In particular, causal inferences were made by examining colliders and confounders (see Edwards, 2000; Pearl, 2000; Rohrer, 2018 for more information).”
Aarsman, S. R., Greenwood, C. J., Linardon, J., Rodgers, R. F., Messer, M., Jarman, H. K., & Fuller‐Tyszkiewicz, M. (2024) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101704 · Cited by 7
Bearing the Burden: Outcomes and Moderators of Social Burden in the Workplace
Gallagher, C. M., & Hughes, I. M. (2020) · Occupational Health Science · doi:10.1007/s41542-020-00063-4 · Cited by 8
A new Mathematical Modell for COVID-19: A Fuzzy Cognitive Map Approach for Coronavirus Diseases
Groumpos, P. P. (2020) · International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA) · doi:10.1109/iisa50023.2020.9284378 · Cited by 7
Height is associated with more self-serving beliefs about wealth redistribution
Richardson, T. (2020) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.12.001 · Cited by 7
Smetter, J., Antler, C. A., Young, M. A., & Rohan, K. J. (2021) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-020-09861-0 · Cited by 8
Does the privacy paradox exist? Comment on Yu et al.’s (2020) meta-analysis
Dienlin, T., & Sun, Y. (2021) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2020.2711 · Cited by 9
Equilibrium Causal Models: Connecting Dynamical Systems Modeling and Cross-Sectional Data AnalysisPreprint
Ryan, O., & Dablander, F. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/q4d9g · Cited by 7
Life events and life satisfaction: Estimating effects of multiple life events in combined modelsPreprint
Krämer, M. D., Rohrer, J. M., Lucas, R. E., & Richter, D. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/wfg8h · Cited by 7
Self-citationMartinez, A., Browne, L., & Knee, C. R. (2024) · Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace · doi:10.5817/cp2024-3-2 · Cited by 10
Quantifying water effluent violations and enforcement impacts using causal AI
Wang, Y., Sobien, D., Kulkarni, A., & Batarseh, F. A. (2024) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.1002/poi3.402 · Cited by 6
Rodger, A., Barsalou, L. W., & Papies, E. K. (2024) · Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1111/aphw.12598 · Cited by 6
“Although observational data can aid in accumulating evidence for causal explanations by evidencing consistent or inconsistent associations, it should be done cautiously (Diener et al., 2022; Grosz et al., 2020; Rohrer, 2018).”
Road Mortality Contributes to the Evolution of an Urban–Rural Cline in Squirrel Coat Color
Parlin, A. F., Cosentino, B. J., Lehtinen, R. M., McDonald, J. E., Sinclair, E. C. C., & Gibbs, J. P. (2025) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.70109 · Cited by 6
Bartram, D. (2025) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcaf014 · Cited by 6
Not by Selection Alone: Expanding the Scope of Gene‐Culture Coevolution
Kasser, S. M., Laland, K. N., Fortunato, L., & Feldman, M. W. (2025) · Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.70007 · Cited by 8
“More importantly, a broader approach enables richer generative models, commonly visualized as direct acyclical graphs (DAGS [194]), which encode potential causal relationships.”
Allen, T., Taberner, M., Zhilkin, M., Alexander, J., Harper, D. J., & Rhodes, D. (2025) · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching · doi:10.1177/17479541251371004 · Cited by 6
“However, again it is important to remember that correlation does not imply causation, 31 and factors like physiological pro fi le or playing style could also affect running load.”
Overview of Challenges in Brain-Based Predictive Modeling: Toward Meaningful Predictive Insights
Komeyer, V., Nieto, N., Eickhoff, S. B., Raimondo, F., & Patil, K. R. (2025) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.09.003 · Cited by 6
Huang, D., Li, J., Jiao, C., & Xu, W. (2025) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.114068 · Cited by 6
Attitude to ambiguity as a predictor of analytic thinking
van Zyl, C. J. J. (2020) · South African Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0081246320953715 · Cited by 7
“These causal frameworks are more established in fields like epidemiology and economics, but is gaining traction in psychology, as appreciation of its importance is increasing (Foster, 2010; Grosz et al., 2020; Rohrer, 2018).”
BackgroundDunlop, P. D., de Vries, R. E., Jolly, A. A., & Parker, S. K. (2023) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2023.104358 · Cited by 6
Messer, D. J., Henry, L. A., & Danielsson, H. (2023) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci13101377 · Cited by 6
“This assumption is rarely tested, but it should be [48]; logistic regression can be used when this assumption is violated.”
BackgroundThiede, N., Stengelin, R., Seibold, A., & Haun, D. B. M. (2023) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00102 · Cited by 6
“While strict causal inference regarding this link suffers from the non-experimental assessment of these variables, we proposed a causal model using directed acyclic graphs (Pearl, 2013), following the suggestions of Rohrer (2018; see OSF repository: https://osf.io/7pvrx).”
Gendered competencies and gender composition: A human versus algorithm evaluator comparison
Merritt, S. M., Ryan, A. M., Gardner, C. L., Liff, J., & Mondragon, N. J. (2023) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12459 · Cited by 6
Discovering cyclic causal models in psychological research
Park, K., Waldorp, L., & Ryan, O. (2024) · advances in/psychology · doi:10.56296/aip00012 · Cited by 12
Introduction to causal graphs for education researchers
Feng, Y. (2024) · Asia Pacific Education Review · doi:10.1007/s12564-024-09980-3 · Cited by 6
“For better scientific practice, it is important to be transparent in stating the assumptions to allow for critical assessment of causal claims (e.g., Rohrer, 2018).”
InfluentialKordsmeyer, T. L., Freund, D., Ueshima, A., Kuroda, K., Kameda, T., & Penke, L. (2024) · Personality Science · doi:10.1177/27000710241257814 · Cited by 6
“Generally, third variables not assessed in this study may partly explain or confound the results observed, for example as a collider bias due to participants ’ educational status (for further explanation see Grosz et al., 2020; Rohrer, 2018).”
Combining Statistical and Causal Mediation Analysis
Montoya, A. K. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009170123.026 · Cited by 8
Hofer, M. K., Blume, L., Turner, B. J., Schäfer, L., Croy, I., & Hummel, T. R. (2025) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2025.109002 · Cited by 7
“While these findings are troubling, it is important to acknowledge that recall biases and third variable problems often offer plausible alternative explanations for retrospective reports and cross-sectional correlations (Pannucci & Wilkins, 2010; Rohrer, 2018).”
Personality, Preferences and Socioeconomic Behavior
Ferguson, E., Zhao, K., & Smillie, L. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.044 · Cited by 6
Szewczyk, Z., Weaver, N., Rollo, M. E., Deeming, S., Holliday, E. G., Reeves, P., & Collins, C. E. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12113532 · Cited by 8
“It is commonly believed that it is necessary to control for all potential confounders and that adjusting for more confounders cannot worsen causal inference; however, the inclusion of unnecessary covariates, or over-adjustment, carries the risk of introducing unintended bias and reducing statistical power [32].”
BackgroundA Causal Web between Chronotype and Metabolic Health Traits
Williams, J. A., Russ, D., Bravo-Merodio, L., Cardoso, V. R., Pendleton, S. C., Aziz, F., Acharjee, A., & Gkoutos, G. V. (2021) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes12071029 · Cited by 5
“Unlike confounders, conditioning on colliders in regression introduces bias into the association between exposure and outcome [34].”
BackgroundShand, C., Crozier, S., Vassilev, I., Penn-Newman, D., Dhuria, P., Cooper, C. C., Rogers, A. E., Baird, J., & Vogel, C. (2021) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114228 · Cited by 10
Deschênes, S. S., Mohseni, M., Lindekilde, N., Forget, G., Burns, R. J., Pouwer, F., & Schmitz, N. (2022) · Current Diabetes Reviews · doi:10.2174/1573399818666220329185229 · Cited by 7
The effects of spanking on psychosocial outcomes: revisiting genetic and environmental covariation
Barbaro, N., Connolly, E. J., Sogge, M., Shackelford, T. K., & Boutwell, B. B. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-021-09496-5 · Cited by 6
“All univariate and bivariate models were estimated using M plus 8.1 (Muthén & Muthén, 1998–2018) with full information maximum likelihood estimation and using the WLMSV estimator.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEye movements reveal that low confidence precedes deliberation
Purcell, Z. A., Wastell, C. A., & Sweller, N. (2022) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218221126505 · Cited by 6
“We Endogeneity and the Confidence-Deliberation Mechanism Endogeneity occurs when a predictor (X) may be affected by an outcome (Y) or both may be influenced by a third, usually unknown or unmeasured, variable (see Antonakis et al., 2010; Rohrer, 2018).”
BackgroundHabtewold, T. D., Hao, J., Liemburg, E. J., Baştürk, N., Bruggeman, R., & Alizadeh, B. Z. (2023) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm13060954 · Cited by 6
“Fourth, as efforts have been devoted to unravelling the pathophysiology of SSD, it can also be beneficial to further examine the interrelatedness and distinctiveness of positive and negative symptoms, cognitive impairments and psychosocial functions [42] using causal discovery models [53,54].”
BackgroundBrohmer, H., Köstenbaumer, D., Thaller, A., Fleiß, E., Athenstaedt, U., & Posch, A. (2023) · Energy Efficiency · doi:10.1007/s12053-023-10157-x · Cited by 7
“Moreover, the size and direction of the effects of additional variables, along with potential confounding factors, should be carefully considered beforehand (see Rohrer, 2018).”
BackgroundDiscovering causality for efficient cooperation in multi-agent environments
Pina, R., Silva, D., & Artaud, C. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130358 · Cited by 9
Damian, R. I., & Spengler, M. (2020) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/0890207020969010 · Cited by 7
“A confound is a variable that is theorized to have a causal effect on both the predictor and the outcome of interest (Rohrer, 2018)—in our case, a confound should have a theorized causal effect on both birth order and career and status attainment outcomes.”
BackgroundTemperament and Brain Networks of Attention
Rothbart, M. K., Posner, M. I., & Sheese, B. E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.016 · Cited by 8
Biesanz, J. C., & Wallace, J. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.006 · Cited by 7
Hoogeveen, S., Haaf, J. M., Bulbulia, J. A., Ross, R. M., McKay, R., Altay, S., Bendixen, T., Berniûnas, R., Cheshin, A., Gentili, C., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/sf8ez · Cited by 6
Quantifying Causal Pathways of Teleconnections
Kretschmer, M. (2022) · EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-8246 · Cited by 9
Haehner, P., Kritzler, S., & Luhmann, M. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/3mjr7 · Cited by 6
Compassion for All: Real-World Online Donations Contradict Compassion Fade
Meier, D. S. (2024) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/08997640241255707 · Cited by 5
“The directed acyclic graph (DAG; Rohrer, 2018) that visualizes this assumption is shown in Figure 2.”
Causal Inference for Dummies: A Tutorial on Directed Acyclic Graphs and Balancing Weights
Primbs, M. A., Bijlstra, G., Holland, R. W., & Thoemmes, F. J. (2025) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2025.43.3.217 · Cited by 6
Models as Prediction Machines: How to Convert Confusing Coefficients Into Clear Quantities
Rohrer, J. M., & Arel‐Bundock, V. (2026) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459261424825 · Cited by 6
“Determining whether a causal interpretation is warranted requires careful consideration of identification assumptions (for an introduction in psychology, see Rohrer, 2018).”
InfluentialSelf-citationFernandez-Urbano, R., Bulut, H., & Samuel, R. (2025) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-025-00950-z · Cited by 6
“…above is widely applied in the economics of happiness research–particularly in studies focusing on youth populations–the inclusion of certain control variables that do not necessarily precede eco-anxiety (i.e., intervening variables or colliders) can introduce overcontrol bias (Rohrer, 2018 ).”
Meena, S. K., Meena, S. O., Sangal, V. K., & Dehariya, N. K. (2025) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ae1f3d · Cited by 5
A Systematic Review and Taxonomy of Neuroticism Interventions for the General Public
Wright, A. J., Haehner, P., Hopwood, C. J., & Bleidorn, W. (2026) · Personality Science · doi:10.1177/27000710261421531 · Cited by 7
Kabir, R. S., Kramer, B., Koike, M., & Sponseller, A. C. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1032573 · Cited by 7
“…of communication in Harris, 2022; related self-concept measures, Leeming and Harris, 2022), or consideration of detailed models with mediators or covariate adjustments for related relationships or pathways (e.g., SES), beginning with graphical causal models for observational data (Rohrer, 2018).”
BackgroundSeidman, G., Zeigler‐Hill, V., & Iida, M. (2023) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/02654075231161165 · Cited by 5
“…rather than probability sampling because it is possible that the likelihood of individuals selecting to participate in the study may have been impacted by their possession of certain characteristics which could have altered the associations observed in the present studies (see Rohrer, 2018).”
ResultMeixner, T., Ciancarelli, B., Farrell, E. P., García, D. S., Josek, T., Kelly, M., Meister, P. A., Soule, D. C., & Darner, R. (2023) · Journal of Geoscience Education · doi:10.1080/10899995.2023.2193810 · Cited by 7
“Causation can be claimed when we have deep, collective knowledge to identify the mechanism causing the observed correlation (Rohrer, 2018).”
Francis, L. M., Greenwood, C. J., Enticott, P. G., Mansour, K. A., Smith, I., Graeme, L. G., Olsson, C. A., Milgrom, J., Skouteris, H., & Macdonald, J. A. (2023) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/famp.12912 · Cited by 5
Technology use and integration in state-funded primary schools: a structural equation model
Ventista, O. M., Tsani, P., Brown, C., Coe, R., & Polydoros, G. (2024) · Education 3-13 · doi:10.1080/03004279.2024.2351013 · Cited by 5
“According to Rohrer (2018), non-response bias exists when the variable of interest is related to the questionnaire completion.”
Martínez, C. D. G., & Corredor, J. (2024) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-024-01616-6 · Cited by 5
Varnet, L., Léger, A. C., Boucher, S., Bonnet, C., Petit, C., & Lorenzi, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.640522 · Cited by 5
“causal effect estimates on the basis of observational data (Rohrer, 2018).”
BackgroundHodson, G. (2022) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12561 · Cited by 6
Boutwell, B. B., Narvey, C. S., Helton, J. J., & Piquero, A. R. (2022) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-022-03440-6 · Cited by 4
“If we assume that knowledge of a particular topic will generally always be less than complete, we confront the reality that statistical control can often prove inferior to experimental control [10, 24, 26].”
BackgroundInfluentialVisual Argument Structure Tool (VAST) Version 1.0
Leising, D., Grenke, O., & Cramer, M. (2023) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2021.2911 · Cited by 5
“Note that this diverges from recommendations in the literature on Directed Acyclic Graphs (Rohrer, 2018).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBartulović, D., Steiner, S., Fakleš, D., & Jeličić, M. (2023) · Aerospace · doi:10.3390/aerospace10100856 · Cited by 5
“…between cause and effect [58], the role that human factors play in major aviation accidents [59], the use of causal models to control and manage aircraft accident risk [60], graphical causal models that can serve as powerful tools for detecting interrelations between variables [61], and others.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Rohrer, J. M.
- Affiliations
- German Institute for Economic Research (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Rohrer, Julia M.
- ORCID
- Rohrer, Julia M.
- Venue
- Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-01-29
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-42
- ISSN
- 2515-2459 (ISSN-L)
- 2515-2467
- OpenAlex
- W2776946813
- Cited by
- 1,002
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 124 · 2025: 145 · 2024: 150 · 2023: 147 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 132 · 2020: 137 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 14
- FWCI
- 65.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Keywords
- causal inference, observational data, causal graphical models, confounding, third variable, particle colliders, mediation, statistical control, causal assumptions, correlation versus causation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review