The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thinking Clearly About Correlations and Causation: Graphical Causal Models for Observational Data
Open accessAbstract
Correlation does not imply causation; but often, observational data are the only option, even though the research question at hand involves causality. This article discusses causal inference based on observational data, introducing readers to graphical causal models that can provide a powerful tool for thinking more clearly about the interrelations between variables. Topics covered include the rationale behind the statistical control of third variables, common procedures for statistical control, and what can go wrong during their implementation. Certain types of third variables—colliders and mediators—should not be controlled for because that can actually move the estimate of an association away from the value of the causal effect of interest. More subtle variations of such harmful control include using unrepresentative samples, which can undermine the validity of causal conclusions, and statistically controlling for mediators. Drawing valid causal inferences on the basis of observational data is not a mechanistic procedure but rather always depends on assumptions that require domain knowledge and that can be more or less plausible. However, this caveat holds not only for research based on observational data, but for all empirical research endeavors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532 · cited 1×
“Both old and newer common approaches to estimating the remaining (direct) effect after accounting for a mediator (e.g., Baron & Kenny, 1986; Hayes, 2009) rely on statistical control of the mediating variable, but such approaches can introduce endogenous selection bias (Elwert & Winship, 2014).”
BackgroundMissing data: our view of the state of the art
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.147 · Cited by 11,638 · cited 1×
“Schafer and Graham (2002) have provided an introduction to the management of missing data for psychologists.”
Background(1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,252
Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium
Hayes, A. F. (2009) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637750903310360 · Cited by 9,757 · cited 1×
“Both old and newer common approaches to estimating the remaining (direct) effect after accounting for a mediator (e.g., Baron & Kenny, 1986; Hayes, 2009) rely on statistical control of the mediating variable, but such approaches can introduce endogenous selection bias (Elwert & Winship, 2014).”
BackgroundEstimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies
Rubin, D. B. (1974) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037350 · Cited by 9,436 · cited 1×
“A solid rule of thumb is that researchers should not control for such posttreatment variables (Rosenbaum, 1984; Rubin, 1974).”
BackgroundCausation, Prediction, and Search
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (2001) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1754.001.0001 · Cited by 4,521
Causal diagrams for empirical research
PEARL, J. (1995) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/82.4.669 · Cited by 2,355 · cited 1×
“They were developed primarily by the computer scientist Judea Pearl (e.g., Pearl, 1995; see Pearl, Glymour, & Jewell, 2016, for an introduction) and share many features with structural equation models (SEMs).1 DAGs offer an intuitive approach for thinking about causal structures.”
MethodWhy Propensity Scores Should Not Be Used for Matching
King, G., & Nielsen, R. (2019) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2019.11 · Cited by 1,706 · cited 1×
“The use of propensity scores for matching is controversial, and critics have indicated that other procedures might be preferable (King & Nielsen, 2016).”
BackgroundThe theoretical status of latent variables.
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.2.203 · Cited by 1,566
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2010) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.24.2.3 · Cited by 1,566
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Mohan K., 2013, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26 (NIPS 2013), 1277
- Robins J. M., 1999, Computation, Causation, & Discovery, 305
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,001
Road user behavior: Describing, inferring, predicting and beyond
Donmez, B., McDonald, A. D., Lee, J. D., & Boyle, L. N. (2023) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2023.100932 · Cited by 6
Ascone, L., Mascherek, A., Weber, S., Fischer, D., Augustin, J., Cheng, B., Thomalla, G., Augustin, M., Zyriax, B., Gallinat, J., et al. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.23656 · Cited by 5
“First, although the added covariates in our analyses are meant to reduce potential bias, sometimes adding covariates may even lead to greater distortion, if a collider or mediator is conditioned on (see Elwert & Winship, 2014; Rohrer, 2018, for a comprehensive discussion of this topic).”
BackgroundAre moral people happier? Answers from reputation-based measures of moral character.
Sun, J., Wen, W., & Goodwin, G. P. (2025) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000539 · Cited by 12
Endogeneity in International Business Research: A Commentary
Shaver, J. M. (2019) · JIBS special collections · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22113-3_19 · Cited by 5
Boutwell, B. B., & Adams, C. D. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-020-09436-9 · Cited by 5
Greenwood, C. J., Youssef, G. J., Letcher, P., Spry, E., Thomson, K., Hagg, L. J., Hutchinson, D. M., Macdonald, J. A., McIntosh, J. E., Sanson, A. V., et al. (2020) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106597 · Cited by 5
Personality in Clinical Psychology
Widiger, T. A., & McCabe, G. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.042 · Cited by 5
States and Situations, Traits and Environments
Asendorpf, J. B., & Rauthmann, J. F. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.007 · Cited by 10
Lane, T. J. (2021) · Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation · doi:10.1007/s10926-021-09988-1 · Cited by 5
“In this case, the DAG language would describe the collider as: height → professional basketball player ← skill.”
BackgroundInfluentialAnxiety talking: Does anxiety predict sharing information about COVID-19?
Cantwell, O., & Kushlev, K. (2021) · Technology Mind and Behavior · doi:10.1037/tmb0000057 · Cited by 5
Neff, S. M., Deyo, R. L., Auley, A. L. M., & Lawrence, D. J. (2022) · Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.04.002 · Cited by 5
Bell, V., Tamayo-Agudelo, W., Revill, G., Okai, D., & Poole, N. A. (2023) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjo.2023.47 · Cited by 6
Vickers, A. J., Assel, M. J., Dunn, R. L., Zabor, E. C., Kattan, M. W., van Smeden, M., & Dahly, D. L. (2023) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2023.04.007 · Cited by 5
Killaspy, H. T., Dalton‐Locke, C., Clarke, C. S., Leavey, G., Igoumenou, A., Arbuthnott, M., Barrett, K., & Omar, R. (2024) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-024-05524-6 · Cited by 5
“We will use Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) to ensure a logical and consistent approach to identifying potential confounders [36].”
MethodIsager, P. M. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/btgsr · Cited by 5
Vickers, A. J., Assel, M. J., Dunn, R. L., Zabor, E. C., Kattan, M. W., van Smeden, M., & Dahly, D. L. (2023) · The Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/ju.0000000000003479 · Cited by 5
Reflective thinking predicts disbelief in God across 19 countriesPreprint
Ghasemi, O., Yılmaz, O., İşler, O., Terry, J., & Ross, R. M. (2024) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/wny9p · Cited by 4
Marie, C., Rauscher, C., Hoffmann, M., Bouchat, P., & Bourguignon, D. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ac89v · Cited by 5
Community management and material wellbeing limit forest loss following precipitation anomalies
Clark, M., Sykulski, A. M., Liu, S., Sfyridis, A., Pienkowski, T., Karna, B., Oldekop, J. A., Sangat, S. S., Watrobska, C., Brandt, M., et al. (2026) · Cell Reports Sustainability · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6413705/v1 · Cited by 7
Spielvogel, I. K., Koban, K., & Matthes, J. (2024) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2024.2350717 · Cited by 4
“Additionally, cross-sectional quantitative research does typically (see Grosz, Rohrer, and Thoemmes 2020) not allow for solid insights into causal mechanisms without making strong (i.e. potentially unviable) assumptions (Rohrer 2018).”
BackgroundZulkifli Abd, R. A. I. S., Ramli, N. A., Noor, N. M., Hamid, H. A., Ul–Saufie, A. Z., & Mahmad, M. K. N. (2025) · International Journal of Conservation Science · doi:10.36868/ijcs.2025.01.09 · Cited by 4
Münch, F. F., & Koch, T. (2025) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-025-02781-5 · Cited by 5
“We agree with Rohrer (2018) that researchers can considerably improve their analyses when explicating the causality assumptions involved.”
Alvarez-Bartolo, D., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2025) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459251355586 · Cited by 4
“However, statistical control improves inferences only under ideal scenarios (Rohrer, 2018), and it is recommended that researchers carefully select and justify, both theoretically and empirically, each pretreatment covariate to include in the model (Wysocki et al., 2022).”
Introduction to structural causal models in science studies
Klebel, T., & Traag, V. (2025) · Quantitative Science Studies · doi:10.1162/qss.a.405 · Cited by 4
Health insurance in the United States: A case of effectively maintained inequality?
Lucas, S. R. (2024) · SSM - Population Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101687 · Cited by 4
“First, mediating variables are omitted because controlling for them biases total effect estimates (Rohrer, 2018).”
How does adversity relate to performance across different abilities within individuals?
Young, E. S., Vermeent, S., Frankenhuis, W. E., Nivison, M. D., Simpson, J. A., & Roisman, G. I. (2024) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579424001433 · Cited by 4
“That is, the decision to control for a variable in a statistical model depends a conceptual model of its causal role, and more specifically, whether the variable is a confound (Cinelli et al., 2022; Rohrer, 2018).”
Causal Interpretations of Correlational Evidence Regarding Violence
Nunes, K. L., Hatton, C. E., Pham, A. T., Blank, C., & Maimone, S. (2024) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/08862605241285996 · Cited by 4
“There are other types of validity (e.g., Shadish et al., 2002), non-experimental designs can some-times permit causal inferences, and there are important trade-offs between the different approaches (e.g., internal validity vs. construct validity; Rohrer, 2018; Shadish et al., 2002).”
InfluentialEmpirical methods that provide physical descriptions of dynamic cellular processes
Seim, I., & Grill, S. W. (2024) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2024.12.003 · Cited by 3
“1 B ) (46,47).”
STARNet: A Deep‐Learning Algorithm for Surface Shortwave Radiation Retrieval From Fengyun‐4A
Song, M., Yang, D., Shi, H., Chen, Y., Liu, B., Shen, Y., Ding, Z., & Xia, X. (2025) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2025gl116237 · Cited by 4
“Causality does not imply correlation (Rohrer, 2018), instead, it refers to a cause‐and‐effect relationship, in which changes in one variable directly induce changes in the other, but not vice versa.”
Horner, D. E., Sielaff, A., & Greenberg, J. (2023) · Journal of Humanistic Psychology · doi:10.1177/00221678221144795 · Cited by 5
“Therefore, controlling for a variable such as education level may bias the estimate of association between the other variables, and controlling for such variables with correlational data has been cautioned against (e.g., Rohrer, 2018).”
Kindergarteners' peer relationships and early school absenteeism
Ansari, A., Yang, Q., Purtell, K. M., Lin, T., & Justice, L. M. (2023) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2023.101529 · Cited by 4
Impact of Adolescent Cannabis Use on Neurocognitive and Brain Development
Scott, J. C. (2023) · Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.psc.2023.03.012 · Cited by 5
Thirty Years After the Berlin Wall
Heller, A., & Schmidt, P. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003427469 · Cited by 6
Vermeent, S., Young, E. S., van Gelder, J., & Frankenhuis, W. E. (2024) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2024.101479 · Cited by 4
Social Exclusion Effect on Self-Efficacy
Rajchert, J. M., Molińska, W., & Vonrath, W. (2024) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941241269514 · Cited by 11
“…limitation is that mediators in our study were measured right before the dependent variable, which does not allow drawing cause-and-effect conclusions about the relationship between the mediator and the dependent variable as they could be both under the in fl uence of a condition (Rohrer, 2018).”
Wenren, S., Ding, W., Xie, R., Wang, Z., Wu, X., & Wu, X. (2024) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2024.101729 · Cited by 4
Towards simpler and more transparent quantitative research reports
Vanhove, J. (2020) · ITL Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1075/itl.20010.van · Cited by 5
“A far better solution is to carefully consider whether the covariate is a possible confounder (e.g., by drawing directed acylic graphs; for introductions see Elwert 2013; Rohrer 2018) and, if it is, control for it statistically regardless of balance (Sassenhagen & Alday 2016).”
BackgroundMotivations for Sustainable Consumption: The Case of Vegetables
Gustavsen, G. W. (2020) · International journal on food system dynamics · doi:10.18461/ijfsd.v11i4.58 · Cited by 4
“A good introduction to these methods in psychology is described in Rohrer (2018).”
MethodOn the Use of Causal Models to Build Better Datasets
Garcea, F., Morra, L., & Lamberti, F. (2021) · IEEE Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) · doi:10.1109/compsac51774.2021.00225 · Cited by 5
Gjærde, L. K., Rank, C. U., Andersen, M. K., Jakobsen, L. H., Sengeløv, H., Olesen, G., Kornblit, B. T., Marquart, H. V., Friis, L. S., Petersen, S. L., et al. (2021) · Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma · doi:10.1080/10428194.2021.1992620 · Cited by 4
Liberating Data: Politics of Reality in Interdisciplinary Social Psychology
Sinha, C. (2022) · Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1007/s12124-021-09673-1 · Cited by 4
“They look for how any phenomenon can be saved from the spurious confounding agents which are inadvertently manipulated in the process of phenomenon detection (see also Haig, 2014; Rohrer, 2018).”
Vickers, A. J., Assel, M. J., Dunn, R. L., Zabor, E. C., Kattan, M. W., van Smeden, M., & Dahly, D. L. (2023) · British Journal of Urology · doi:10.1111/bju.16028 · Cited by 4
Do stress and anxiety lead to belief in conspiracy theories?
Fox, N., & Williams, M. N. (2023) · Routledge Open Research · doi:10.12688/routledgeopenres.17925.1 · Cited by 4
Hubbard, E. B., Shannon, O., & Pisor, A. C. (2023) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2023.09.006 · Cited by 4
Weber, S., Mascherek, A., Augustin, J., Cheng, B., Thomalla, G., Hoven, H., Harth, V., Augustin, M., Gallinat, J., & Kühn, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1267900 · Cited by 4
“Parameter are described in the Supplementary material (see Elwert and Winship, 2014 and Rohrer, 2018, for a comprehensive discussion).”
BackgroundUnsupported Causal Inferences in the Professional Counseling Literature Base
Huggins‐Manley, A. C., Wright, E. A., DePue, M. K., & Oberheim, S. T. (2021) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/jcad.12371 · Cited by 4
Development and Psychometric Properties of the Synthetic Drug Dependence Scale in a Chinese Sample
Li, M., Zhang, J., Zhang, D.-C., Che, Q., Liu, Z.-L., Yang, P., Luo, X., & Cai, T.-S. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717029 · Cited by 4
The developmental origins of stress reactivity: an intergenerational life-course perspective
Spry, E., Letcher, P., Patton, G. C., Sanson, A. V., & Olsson, C. A. (2021) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.10.005 · Cited by 4
Designing and conducting observational studies in rehabilitation: challenges and opportunities
Barbosa, S. P., Marques, L. M., Pacheco‐Barrios, K., Imamura, M., Battistella, L. R., Simis, M., & Fregni, F. (2021) · Principles and Practice of Clinical Research Journal · doi:10.21801/ppcrj.2021.73.7 · Cited by 4
Reply to Pearl: Algorithm of the truth vs real-world science
Krieger, N., & Smith, G. D. (2018) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyy071 · Cited by 4
Lüdtke, O., & Robitzsch, A. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/5zdme · Cited by 4
Discovering Cyclic Causal Models in Psychological ResearchPreprint
Park, K., Waldorp, L., & Ryan, O. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qb9t3 · Cited by 4
The Basic Needs in Games (BANG) Model of Video Game Play and Mental HealthPreprint
Ballou, N., & Deterding, S. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/6vedg · Cited by 4
Introduction to causality in science studiesPreprint
Klebel, T., & Traag, V. (2024) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/4bw9e · Cited by 4
How do video games affect mental health? A narrative review of 13 proposed mechanismsPreprint
Ballou, N., Hakman, T., Vuorre, M., Magnusson, K., & Przybylski, A. K. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/q2kxg · Cited by 4
Let’s go beyond “the effect of”: Reappraising the impact of ordinary activities on cognitionPreprint
Román-Caballero, R., Sanabria, D., & Ciria, L. F. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ztsda · Cited by 5
A Network Analysis of Digital Clock Drawing for Command and Copy Conditions
Frank, B. E., Bandyopadhyay, S., Dion, C., Formanski, E., Matusz, E. F., Penney, D. L., Davis, R., O’Connor, M. K., Au, R., Amini, S., et al. (2024) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/10731911241236336 · Cited by 3
“A network representation captures the interplay among components and how they influence one another, potentially establishing causality (Pearl, 1995; Rohrer, 2018).”
Santiago, P. H. R., Smithers, L. G., Townsend, M. L., Quintero, A., Sawyer, A. C. P., Soares, G. H., McCormick, K. M., Procter, A. M., & Jamieson, L. (2025) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0001915 · Cited by 4
Where Do Children Look When Watching Videos With Same-Language Subtitles?
Lopukhina, A., van Heuven, W. J. B., Crowley, R., & Rastle, K. (2025) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976251325789 · Cited by 3
“Likewise, we acknowledge that our analyses of the relationship between reading proficiency and subtitle viewing were based on observational data, making it difficult to determine that reading proficiency plays a definitive causal role in subtitle-viewing behavior (Rohrer, 2018).”
Shaky structures: The wobbly world of causal graphs in software analytics
Hulse, J., Eisty, N. U., & Menzies, T. (2025) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-025-10690-6 · Cited by 3
“Incomplete data can also lead to instabilities in causal graphs [11, 44].”
Understanding the Nature of Pro-Environmental Behaviors: A Psychometric Network Analysis
Clercq, M. D., Lacassagne, D., & Parmentier, M. (2025) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/00139165251356912 · Cited by 3
“However, we may not have selected all the variables that may come into play in determining PEBs, which may have biased some of our results (Rohrer, 2018).”
Yang, H., Weidmann, R., Chopik, W. J., & Lucas, R. E. (2025) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/08902070251369070 · Cited by 4
Ye, Q., Zhang, S.-Y., He, X.-L., Yang, Y., Ni, K., Yang, H., Wei, W., Preece, D. A., Chan, R. C. K., Li, B.-M., et al. (2025) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107877 · Cited by 3
Distress, self-efficacy, feeling informed and the Babble app: A New Zealand neonatal parent sample
Gibson, C., Williams, M. N., Ross, K. J., & de Vries, N. (2022) · Journal of Neonatal Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.jnn.2022.06.004 · Cited by 3
Wilson‐Aggarwal, J. K., Gotts, N., Arnold, K. F., Spyer, M. J., Houlihan, C. F., Nastouli, E., & Manley, E. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0284512 · Cited by 3
Between-Level Incongruences in Human Positivity
Yu, S. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231190824 · Cited by 4
“Rather, it is due to confounding (e.g., Rohrer, 2018).”
Hlynsson, J. I., Gustafsson, O., & Carlbring, P. (2024) · Clinical Psychology in Europe · doi:10.32872/cpe.12083 · Cited by 3
“In an effort to approach a model that might suggest potential causal effects of the war outbreak on anxiety and depressive symptom severity, all variables considered relevant were included in the analysis (Rohrer, 2018).”
MethodChereches, F. S., Ballhausen, N., Olaru, G., Laukka, E. J., & Brehmer, Y. (2024) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbae175 · Cited by 4
“…of these factors might be collider variables, or a variable that is casually influenced by both frequency of contact and cognition, and by controlling for such a variable we might allow for a spurious association to arise (grandchild contact → social involvement/ health ← cognition; Rohrer, 2018).”
Kumwichar, P., Thungthong, J., Liabsuetrakul, T., Tachimori, H., Hosozawa, M., Saito, E., Taniguchi, Y., Chongsuvivatwong, V., & Iso, H. (2024) · Global Health Research and Policy · doi:10.1186/s41256-024-00390-x · Cited by 4
“The outcomes of interest were in-hospital death and death after discharge; however, if our analysis only considered any death after discharge as an outcome, the results might be biased due to deaths from causes unrelated to heart conditions, a phenomenon known as collider bias [18].”
Risk Factors for Dysphagia After Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Retrospective Study
Meißner, I., Dietmann, S., Hüller, G., Mach, O., Vogel, M., Ehret, M., Scheel‐Sailer, A., Aigner, L., Maier, D. D., & Leister, I. (2024) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.12.014 · Cited by 6
Pre‐disability resilience and well‐being following the onset of functional impairments
Spooner, M., Elliott, T. R., Luo, W., Lee, K. M., & Williamson, M. L. C. (2025) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12781 · Cited by 4
“Examining our model with a directed acyclic graph (DAG) – a recommended method to critique a priori assumptions about causal relationships variables (Rohrer, 2018) – we can identify several confounding variables that have ‘backdoor paths’ to all of the variables we studied including genetic…”
Gupta, R., & Anand, A. (2025) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2025.104407 · Cited by 3
A Comparative Study of Short-Term Social Media Use with Face-to-Face Interaction in Adolescence
Mendonça, I., Coelho, F., Rando, B., & Abreu, A. M. (2025) · Children · doi:10.3390/children12040460 · Cited by 10
Reflective thinking predicts disbelief in God across 19 countries
Ghasemi, O., Yılmaz, O., İşler, O., Terry, J., & Ross, R. M. (2025) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-025-02691-9 · Cited by 4
“…to use the results of the current study to infer support for the hypothesised causal impact of reflective thinking on BiG, which, to the best of our knowledge, has yet to be rigorously examined in any observational studies using modern tools of causal inference (Bulbulia, 2024; Rohrer, 2018).”
Don, B. P., Lilly, K. J., Sibley, C. G., Overall, N. C., & Osborne, D. (2025) · Affective Science · doi:10.1007/s42761-025-00304-1 · Cited by 3
Huang, J., Yu, D., Tang, X., Xu, Y., Zhong, X., & Lai, X. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15060785 · Cited by 3
To advance sleep science, let’s study change
Simon, K. C. N. S., & Duggan, K. A. (2025) · SLEEP · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsaf155 · Cited by 2
“Guided by insightsfromstatistics,publichealth,epidemiology,andthesocial sciences [22, 33–42], several plausible theoretical models emerge.”
Community attitudes towards advancing climate justice with climate aid
Stanley, S. K., Ghasemi, O., Kerr, J. R., Ross, R. M., Marques, M. D., Mede, N. G., Berger, S., Alfano, M., Levy, N. L., Ferreira, M., et al. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102679 · Cited by 3
Segal, N. L., Orozco, E. N., Preston, K. S. J., & Gerkens, D. R. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.019 · Cited by 3
Personality Traits and Mental Disorders
Hakulinen, C. A., Jokela, M. M., Mika Kivimaki, B., & Elovainio, M. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.018 · Cited by 4
Anxiety, Depression and Cognitive Dysfunction
Eysenck, M. W., & Holmes, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.033 · Cited by 3
Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N. R., & Moscoso, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.040 · Cited by 4
Attitudes Towards Science During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Wingen, T., Lecuona, O. Z., & Dohle, S. (2022) · European Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.47368/ejhc.2022.105 · Cited by 3
Meyer, J., Schmidt, F. T. C., Fleckenstein, J., & Köller, O. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12543 · Cited by 4
Dalrymple, K. V., Vogel, C., Flynn, A. C., Seed, P. T., Godfrey, K. M., Poston, L., Inskip, H. M., & Crozier, S. (2023) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.23706 · Cited by 4
Kasule, G. W., Mugizi, W., & RWOTHUMIO, O. (2023) · doi:10.58653/nche.v10i2.02 · Cited by 3
Jo, D., & Kim, H. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04824-6 · Cited by 3
“Lastly, the data used in the present study was cross-sectional, and therefore, we were only able to make inferences on causal paths using DAG.”
InfluentialTopal, M. A., Aktas, B. E., Basoglu, S., & Harma, M. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-05097-9 · Cited by 3
“First, the findings were obtained by a cross-sectional design which in turn restricts us from inferring any causal relations (Rohrer, 2018).”
Lock, S. K., Legge, S. E., Kappel, D. B., Willcocks, I. R., Helthuis, M., Jansen, J., Walters, J., Owen, M. J., O’Donovan, M. C., & Pardiñas, A. F. (2023) · Schizophrenia · doi:10.1038/s41537-023-00404-6 · Cited by 3
Simulating Flight Crew Workload Settings to Mitigate Fatigue Risk in Flight Operations
Bartulović, D., Steiner, S., Fakleš, D., & Jeličić, M. M. (2023) · Aerospace · doi:10.3390/aerospace10100904 · Cited by 2
Jie, H., Lu, H., & Huang, Y. (2024) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos15080984 · Cited by 3
Shrovnal, J. S., Ray, B. A., Carl, D. D., Shaw, S. L., Sapper, S. A., Zunker, C. A., & Lind, R. A. (2024) · Journal of Great Lakes Research · doi:10.1016/j.jglr.2024.102424 · Cited by 2
Yin, Z., Gong, B., Liu, Z., Yang, D., Chen, S., & Li, Z. (2025) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2025.111164 · Cited by 3
Exploring the contributions of N of 1 methods to health psychology research and practice
McDonald, S., & Johnston, D. W. (2019) · Health Psychology Update · doi:10.53841/bpshpu.2019.28.1.38 · Cited by 3
Models of Personality Structure
Raad, B. D., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.012 · Cited by 4
Cognitive Processes and Models
Matthews, G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.028 · Cited by 5
Stanivuk, T., Bartulović, D., & Bartulović, D. (2022) · Transactions on Maritime Science · doi:10.7225/toms.v11.n02.w05 · Cited by 3
Basic Needs, Goals and Motivation
Szalma, J. L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.030 · Cited by 3
Regression-based mediation analysis: a formula for the bias due to an unobserved precursor variable
Kim, S. B., & Lee, J. (2021) · Journal of the Korean Statistical Society · doi:10.1007/s42952-021-00105-9 · Cited by 3
“2013; Kang 2014; Rohrer 2018; Adams et al.”
Personality in Cross-Cultural Perspective
Dragūns, J. G., & Tanaka‐Matsumi, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.037 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Rohrer, J. M.
- Affiliations
- German Institute for Economic Research (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Rohrer, Julia M.
- ORCID
- Rohrer, Julia M.
- Venue
- Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-01-29
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-42
- ISSN
- 2515-2459 (ISSN-L)
- 2515-2467
- OpenAlex
- W2776946813
- Cited by
- 1,002
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 124 · 2025: 145 · 2024: 150 · 2023: 147 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 132 · 2020: 137 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 14
- FWCI
- 65.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Keywords
- causal inference, observational data, causal graphical models, confounding, third variable, particle colliders, mediation, statistical control, causal assumptions, correlation versus causation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
