The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rejecting or Accepting Parameter Values in Bayesian Estimation
Open accessAbstract
This article explains a decision rule that uses Bayesian posterior distributions as the basis for accepting or rejecting null values of parameters. This decision rule focuses on the range of plausible values indicated by the highest density interval of the posterior distribution and the relation between this range and a region of practical equivalence (ROPE) around the null value. The article also discusses considerations for setting the limits of a ROPE and emphasizes that analogous considerations apply to setting the decision thresholds for p values and Bayes factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“There is no uniquely correct ROPE; however, by convention, the ROPE range is often set at half the size of Cohen’s definition of small effect size (i.e. 0.2 [306];) resulting in ROPE values of ±0.1 and ±0.05 for standardized mean differences (e.g. Cohen’s d = group 1 mean – group 2 mean/pooled standard deviation) and standardized regression coefficients (i.e. sβ = coefficient from a regression on”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 · Cited by 12,558
The ASA Statement on p -Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108 · Cited by 6,306 · cited 1×
“Discrete decisions should be avoided if possible, because such decisions encourage people to ignore the magnitude of the parameter value and its uncertainty (e.g., Cumming, 2014; Kruschke & Liddell, 2018b; Wasserstein & Lazar, 2016, and many references cited therein).”
BackgroundJAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling
Plummer, M. (2003) · Cited by 4,720
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
The New Statistics: Why and How
Cumming, G. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613504966 · Cited by 3,200
Bayes, T. (1763) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London · doi:10.1098/rstl.1763.0053 · Cited by 3,023
AN ESSAY TOWARDS SOLVING A PROBLEM IN THE DOCTRINE OF CHANCES
BAYES (1958) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/45.3-4.296 · Cited by 2,939
Redefine statistical significance
Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Berk, R., Bollen, K. A., Brembs, B., Brown, L., Camerer, C., et al. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z · Cited by 2,772
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Jeffreys H., 1961, Theory of probability
- Lakens D., 2017, t, 8, 355
- Lesaffre E., 2008, Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 66, 150
- Little T. A., 2015, BioPharm International, 28, 45
- Westlake W. J., 1981, Biometrics, 37, 591
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 742
Within-subject confidence intervals for pairwise differences in scatter plots
Schütz, A. C., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2025) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-025-02750-1 · Cited by 6
“If a Bayesian credible interval is plotted (Kruschke, 2018; Morey et al., 2016), one could interpret that the mean difference between the paired observations lies with 95% probability within the CI.”
Aging Increases Cross-Modal Distraction by Unexpected Sounds: Controlling for Response Speed
Leiva, A., Andrés, P., & Parmentier, F. B. R. (2021) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.733388 · Cited by 8
“It is worth pointing out that this 95% HDI does not overlap with a Region Of Practical Equivalence (ROPE) corresponding to a small effect size (d = 0.2) centered around zero (Kruschke, 2011, 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialMaruhn, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Virtual Reality · doi:10.3389/frvir.2021.746971 · Cited by 6
“Kruschke (2018) de fi nes ROPEs based TABLE 1 | Model comparison for predicting crossings as a function of condition, gap size, and speed as fi xed factors and participant as a random factor.”
BackgroundBates, A., King, C., Dhar, M., Fitzpatrick, C., & Laven, R. A. (2022) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2021-21585 · Cited by 6
Organic matter sources and composition in four watersheds with mixed land cover
Kelso, J. E., & Baker, M. A. (2022) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-022-04884-y · Cited by 6
“Parameter values within the HDI have higher probability density than values outside the HDI, and the total probability of values in the 95% HDI is 95% (Kruschke, 2018).”
BackgroundEmpirical evidence for moral Bayesianism
Cohen, H., Nissan‐Rozen, I., & Maril, A. (2022) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2022.2096430 · Cited by 6
“If 95% of the HDI falls inside the defined ROPE [−.1,.1], then one can accept the null hypothesis; otherwise, the results are inconclusive (Kruschke, 2018).”
ResultMotor outcomes congruent with intentions may sharpen metacognitive representations
Charalampaki, A., Peters, C., Maurer, H., Maurer, L. K., Müller, H., Verrel, J., & Filevich, E. (2023) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105388 · Cited by 6
Balta, N., Japashov, N., Bakytkazy, T., Abdikadyr, B., & Nurgaliyeva, K. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24274 · Cited by 6
A Bayesian approach to (re)examining learning effects of cognitive linguistics–inspired instruction
Wong, M. H. I., & Prange, J. (2024) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263124000603 · Cited by 6
“There are approximately 100 EMI schools in Hong Kong, accounting for roughly 30% of local secondary schools.”
Jones, A. L., Jaeger, B., & Schild, C. (2020) · Early Human Development · doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105272 · Cited by 6
“[50,58,60], and is thus a liberal ROPE (larger ROPEs being more conservative and difficult to overcome).”
Bayesian interpretation of immunotherapy trials with dynamic treatment effects
Álvarez, E. C., Sánchez-Arráez, Á., Jiménez‐Fonseca, P., Alvarez-Manceñido, F., Martínez‐Martínez, I., Mihic-Góngora, L., & Carmona‐Bayonas, A. (2021) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2021.11.002 · Cited by 6
Revisiting the evidentiary basis for ecological cascades with conservation impacts
Mumby, P. J., Chaloupka, M. Y., Bozec, Y., Steneck, R. S., & Montero‐Serra, I. (2021) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12847 · Cited by 6
“Standard Bayesian inference can quantify the specific probability of an outcome, but its use is constrained because many decision-makers desire a somewhat binary assessment (Kruschke, 2018).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCan third-party observers detect attraction in others based on subtle nonverbal cues?
Samara, I., Roth, T. S., Nikolić, M., Prochazkova, E., & Kret, M. E. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-02927-0 · Cited by 7
Suzuki, J. (2022) · Physiological Reports · doi:10.14814/phy2.15534 · Cited by 5
“1, the difference was regarded as significant (Kruschke, 2018; Kruschke & Liddell, 2018).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analyses
Beffara, B., Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2021) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2018.869 · Cited by 6
“16 (Kruschke, 2018).”
BackgroundMethodbrmsmargins: Bayesian Marginal Effects for 'brms' Models
Wiley, J. F., & Hedeker, D. (2021) · doi:10.32614/cran.package.brmsmargins · Cited by 6
Holder, N. D., Batten, A. J., Shiner, B. R., & Maguen, S. (2025) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x241304072 · Cited by 6
Integrative cardiovascular dose–response to graded lower‐body negative pressure
Whittle, R. S., Keller, N., Hall, E. A., Patanam, S., Dunbar, B. J., & Diaz‐Artiles, A. (2025) · Experimental Physiology · doi:10.1113/ep092483 · Cited by 7
Guo, M., Ikink, I., Roelofs, K., & Figner, B. (2025) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-025-02709-2 · Cited by 6
Models as Prediction Machines: How to Convert Confusing Coefficients Into Clear Quantities
Rohrer, J. M., & Arel‐Bundock, V. (2026) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459261424825 · Cited by 6
“Instead, the equivalence argument will quantify the size of the posterior density in a region of practical equivalence (ROPE; Kruschke, 2018; Makowski et al., 2019).”
Kiers, H. A. L., & Tendeiro, J. N. (2025) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/25152459251365960 · Cited by 5
“(p. 302) Kruschke (2018) offered an in-depth discussion of the choice and use of the ROPE and related this to the bounds used in equivalence testing and noninferiority testing.”
InfluentialKelter, R. (2023) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/09622802231184636 · Cited by 5
Prediction error in models of adaptive behavior
Navarro, V. M., Dwyer, D. M., & Honey, R. C. (2023) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.08.043 · Cited by 5
“28 This type of equivalence test computes the percentage of the posterior distribution that falls within a region of practical equivalence (ROPE).”
Do Differences in Values Influence Disagreements in Online Discussions?
van der Meer, M., Vossen, P. T. J. M., Jonker, C. M., & Murukannaiah, P. K. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.992 · Cited by 8
“…odds of the hypotheses e.g., in the form of Highest Density Intervals (HDI) might yield more insights, and would involve deciding on a region of practical equivalence (ROPE), as well as picking a thus far unknown prior distribution over the values for S in our two hypotheses (Kruschke, 2018).”
ResultMadrid, J., Benning, L., Selig, M., Ulrich, B., Jolles, B. M., Favre, J., & Benninger, D. H. (2024) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1269772 · Cited by 4
“The ROPE was calculated using a small effect size (0.2 standard deviations of all parameter data) as the region of practical equivalence (Kruschke, 2018).”
MethodInfluentialThe effects of threat on complex decision-making: evidence from a virtual environment
Laycock, A., Schofield, G. P., & McCall, C. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-72812-2 · Cited by 6
“This approach allowed for comparison between groups on model components, given that comparisons that do not include 0 (no change) within the 95% highest density interval (HDI) can be considered strong evidence in support of a difference 62 .”
Verdú, M. M., McAteer, S. M., Waltzing, B. M., Caenegem, E. E. V., & Hardwick, R. M. (2025) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.02.056 · Cited by 5
The Categorization of L3 Vowels Near First Exposure by Spanish-English Bilinguals
Parrish, K. (2022) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages7030226 · Cited by 5
Mazzinari, G., Zampieri, F. G., Ball, L., Campos, N. S., Bluth, T., Hemmes, S. N. T., Ferrando, C., Librero, J., Soro, M., Pelosi, P. P., et al. (2022) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.125861.1 · Cited by 5
Jovanović, M. (2023) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1080/10255842.2023.2170713 · Cited by 5
Billot, M., Chalmers, R. A., Cervin, M., Sutton, A., Reid, V. M., Singh, N. N., & Medvedev, O. N. (2023) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-023-02211-7 · Cited by 5
“We have done so by defining a region of practical equivalence (ROPE) around the null hypothesis (Kruschke, 2018).”
BackgroundLinde, M., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2023) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-023-02097-y · Cited by 7
“Alternatively, the highest density interval of the posterior distribution could be compared to a predefined region of practical equivalence: If the highest density interval does not overlap with the region of equivalence, the alternative hypothesis can be accepted [24, 31, 32].”
BackgroundBorszcz, F. K., de Aguiar, R. A., Costa, V. P., Denadai, B. S., & de Lucas, R. D. (2024) · The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000004772 · Cited by 6
“Instead, Bayesian ’ s analysis allows for the incorporation of prior knowledge or beliefs about effect sizes, which can improve the accuracy and precision of estimates (82,130).”
BackgroundMethodConcentration toward the mode: Estimating changes in the shape of a distribution of student data
Motz, B. A. (2024) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101364 · Cited by 8
O’Callaghan, C., Hezemans, F. H., Subramaniam, N., Ye, R., Tsvetanov, K. A., Murley, A. G., Holland, N., Orlando, I. F., Regenthal, R., Barker, R. A., et al. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-08627-2 · Cited by 9
“55 (492.81) [80 – 1984] Dataarepresentedasmean(SD), [range] .”
InfluentialThe impact of private hosting on the integration of Ukrainian refugees in Germany
Herpell, M., Marbach, M., Harder, N., Orlova, A., Hangartner, D., & Hainmueller, J. (2025) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02303-5 · Cited by 21
Suzuki, J. (2021) · Physiological Reports · doi:10.14814/phy2.14780 · Cited by 5
“1, the difference was regarded as significant [19, 20].”
BackgroundMethodKelter, R. (2022) · The R Journal · doi:10.32614/rj-2022-009 · Cited by 5
The connection still matters: Therapeutic alliance with digital treatment for alcohol use disorder
Benitez, B., Frankforter, T. L., Nich, C., & Kiluk, B. D. (2023) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.15199 · Cited by 6
Sidhu, D. M., Athanasopoulou, A., Archer, S. L., Czarnecki, N., Curtin, S. L., & Pexman, P. M. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0287831 · Cited by 8
Lionetti, F., Calcagnì, A., D’Urso, G., Spinelli, M., Fasolo, M., Pluess, M., & Pastore, M. (2024) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.14000 · Cited by 5
Inclusive Leadership: Exploration of Individual and Situational Antecedents
Mendelsohn, D. B. (2021) · doi:10.7916/d8-bt9v-c476 · Cited by 8
Rognli, E. W., Waraan, L., Czajkowski, N. O., & Aalberg, M. (2020) · Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology · doi:10.21307/sjcapp-2020-011 · Cited by 7
“We report the 66% and 90% Highest Density Intervals (44) of the marginal posterior distributions of each parameter.”
BackgroundTendeiro, J. N., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2022) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000505 · Cited by 3
Schaefer, L., Ikink, I., Woyke, I. C., Heuvelmans, V., Roelofs, K., & Figner, B. (2022) · Decision · doi:10.1037/dec0000192 · Cited by 6
With Bayesian Estimation One Can Get All That Bayes Factors Offer, and MorePreprint
Kiers, H. A. L., & Tendeiro, J. N. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/zbpmy · Cited by 5
Williams, Z. J., Schaaf, R. C., Ausderau, K., Baranek, G. T., Barrett, D. J., Cascio, C. J., Dumont, R. L., Eyoh, E. E., Failla, M. D., Feldman, J. I., et al. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2447849/v1 · Cited by 5
Prediction tendency, eye movements, and attention in a unified framework of neural speech trackingPreprint
Schubert, J., Gehmacher, Q., Schmidt, F., Hartmann, T., & Weisz, N. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.1101/2023.06.27.546746 · Cited by 5
“The dependent variable (absolute weights) was z-scored across time-lags and models to get standardised betas for the mediation effect (i.e. c’ c): As suggested by (Kruschke, 2018), a null effect was considered for betas ranging between - 0.1 and 0.1.”
InfluentialBates, A., Wells, M., Fitzpatrick, C., & Laven, R. A. (2024) · New Zealand Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1080/00480169.2024.2417925 · Cited by 4
“Consequently, the model outputs were expressed in terms of the median predicted difference (and the 90 or 95% highest density interval (HDI); Kruschke 2018; Makowski et al. 2019), between treated and control cows for an average cow for each visit and for an average cow averaged over all visits…”
Penasso, H., Peternell, G., Schultheis, R., Pitschl, A., Leskovar, R., Gardetto, A., Ernst, J., Schmid‐Zalaudek, K., & Schaden, W. (2025) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106443 · Cited by 4
The Impact of Disturbance on Tree Size Distributions in the United States
Eichenwald, A. J., Grady, J. M., Knott, J. A., Read, Q. D., Rodriguez, J. M., & Record, S. (2025) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/geb.70102 · Cited by 4
Sato, M., Warwick, L., Pitas, N., & Liechty, T. (2025) · Leisure Sciences · doi:10.1080/01490400.2025.2566939 · Cited by 4
Controlled Yet Natural: A Hybrid BDI-LLM Conversational Agent for Child Helpline Training
Owayyed, M. A., Denga, A., & Brinkman, W. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA) · doi:10.1145/3717511.3747075 · Cited by 4
“1 × sd ( score ) ) to define negligible or better effects [30].”
Meier, Y., & Masur, P. K. (2025) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/hqaf025 · Cited by 4
The impact of mental images on reasoning: A study on aphantasia
Clézio, D. L., Delem, M., Monzel, M., & Plancher, G. (2026) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2026.109376 · Cited by 5
Domaradzki, J., & Koźlenia, D. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-65444-z · Cited by 7
Cho, J., Pires, A., & Brennan, J. (2024) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2024.2384051 · Cited by 4
“Utilising the Bayesian stopping rule (e.g. Douven, 2023; Gelman et al., 2013; Kruschke, 2015, 2018) can also be considered as an alternative.”
How does adversity relate to performance across different abilities within individuals?
Young, E. S., Vermeent, S., Frankenhuis, W. E., Nivison, M. D., Simpson, J. A., & Roisman, G. I. (2024) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579424001433 · Cited by 4
“We chose a ROPE falling between β = − .10 and β = .10 (Kruschke, 2018; Lakens et al., 2018).”
Oldenburger, M. M., Hasrat, R., Marinović, A. A. B., Gremmer, E. R., Zwart, E., Goderski, G., Duijm, G., Bogaert, D., Meijer, A., Swart, A., et al. (2025) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2025.121392 · Cited by 4
Akan, M., & Benjamin, A. S. (2023) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2023.104433 · Cited by 4
Rognli, E. W., & Fjermestad, K. W. (2023) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-023-02610-3 · Cited by 5
“…is important to note that in Bayesian inference, a parameter estimate near zero, as we found for the difference in regression coefficients between genders, is as interpretable as any other estimate, unlike non-significant estimates near zero in null hypothesis significance testing (Kruschke, 2018).”
ResultBehavioral state‐specific resource selection of northern bobwhite chicks
Hill, J. N., Terhune, T. M., & Martin, J. A. (2023) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.1002/jwmg.22469 · Cited by 4
Casillas, J. V., Garrido-Pozú, J. J., Parrish, K., Arroyo, L. F., Rodríguez, N., Esposito, R., Chang, I., Gómez, K., Constantin-Dureci, G., Shao, J., et al. (2023) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716423000310 · Cited by 7
“To assess our preregistered hypotheses we established a region of practical equivalence (ROPE) around a point null value of 0 (see Kruschke, 2018) using the following formula: α ) is the distance between the two thresholds and indicates the evidence required to make a decision.”
Rodríguez, C. L., Haue, A. D., Mazzoni, G., Eriksson, R., Biel, J. H., Cantwell, L., Westergaard, D., Belling, K., & Brunak, S. (2023) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000336 · Cited by 4
“If the HDI is completely outside the ROPE, the null hypothesis was rejected; whereas if all most values of HDI covers the ROPE the null hypothesis was accepted [58].”
BackgroundSourav, S., Kekunnaya, R., Bottari, D., Shareef, I., Pitchaimuthu, K., & Röder, B. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-05749-3 · Cited by 4
“…a Δ C 1 was ascertained using a one-sided Bayes factor indicating substantial evidence ( BF þ 0 > 3) and when the 95% highest-density credible interval for Δ C 1 (95% CrI) fell outside a null region of practical equivalence, de fi ned as 0.1 times the standard deviation of the data (ROPE test) 104 .”
MethodInfluentialFeraco, T., & Cona, G. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0307560 · Cited by 7
Forage ecology of Neotropical fish in Brazilian biomes using stable isotopes
Martinelli, L. A., Augusto, F. G., Filho, A. L. A., Nardoto, G. B., Diniz‐Reis, T. R., Benedito, E., & Marques, T. S. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177682 · Cited by 4
Forecasting with Deep Learning: Beyond Average of Average of Average Performance
Cerqueira, V., Roque, L., & Soares, C. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-78977-9_9 · Cited by 4
Harrison, G. W., Hofmeyr, A., Kincaid, H., Monroe, B. A., Ross, D., Schneider, M. K., & Swarthout, J. T. (2021) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.04.003 · Cited by 4
“This “region of practical equivalence” (ROPE) from a Bayesian perspective [19] corresponds to the range of posterior estimates generated from randomly selected token allocations for each bin between 0 and 20.”
BackgroundElli, G. V., Bedny, M., & Landau, B. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104683 · Cited by 4
Englund, M. D., Whitham, W., Conway, C. M., Beran, M. J., & Washburn, D. A. (2021) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/s13420-021-00485-2 · Cited by 4
“We used a conservative ROPE in which only an estimated change greater than what would represent a Cohen's d of .9 (±.45 the standard deviation of discriminability or RT) was taken to represent the presence of an effect (Kruschke, 2018; McCartney & Rosenthal, 2000).”
MethodThe sooner the better: clinical and neural correlates of impulsive choice in Tourette disorder
Atkinson-Clément, C., de Liege, A., Klein-Koerkamp, Y., Béranger, B., Valabrègue, R., Delorme, C., Roze, E. F., Fernández-Egea, E., Hartmann, A., Robbins, T. W., et al. (2021) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-021-01691-2 · Cited by 4
Repetition effects in action planning reflect effector- but not hemisphere-specific coding
Seegelke, C., Schonard, C., & Heed, T. (2021) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00326.2021 · Cited by 8
Martins, C. P. P., Arnold, A., Kömpf, K., Schubert, P., Ziegler, M., Wilke, T., & Reichert, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2022.872631 · Cited by 4
With Bayesian estimation one can get all that Bayes factors offer, and more
Kiers, H. A. L., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2022) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-022-02164-3 · Cited by 10
“See also Kruschke (2018); a less detailed but related account on this is also given by Williams, Bååth, and Philipp (2017).”
BackgroundInfluentialBayesian Analysis of Benchmark Examples for Data-Driven Site Characterization
Mavritsakis, A., Schweckendiek, T., Teixeira, A., Smyrniou, E., & Nuttall, J. (2023) · ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A Civil Engineering · doi:10.1061/ajrua6.rueng-975 · Cited by 4
Anderson, H. L., Olivo, J., & Karubian, J. O. (2023) · The Auk · doi:10.1093/ornithology/ukad021 · Cited by 4
Slavov, S. D., Dimitrov, D. M., Konsulova-Bakalova, M. I., & Van, L. S. B. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16103684 · Cited by 4
“The values of the ROPEs are chosen according to recommendations given in [45].”
MethodPerry, S. J., Kelley, M. C., & Tucker, B. V. (2024) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/10.0024345 · Cited by 4
Wolff, B., Franco, V. R., Roberts, R., Skoss, R., Magiati, I., & Glasson, E. J. (2024) · Advances in Mental Health · doi:10.1080/18387357.2024.2305726 · Cited by 5
“Bayesian parameter estimation with 95% highest density intervals (HDIs) not encompassing zero were considered evidence for an e ff ect, conditional on the assumption that the e ff ect exists (Kruschke, 2018).”
Valenced Priming with Acquired Affective Concepts in Music
Lahdelma, I., & Eerola, T. (2024) · Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1525/mp.2024.41.3.161 · Cited by 4
Experience and self‐interest: Diverging responses to global warming
Gazmararian, A. F., & Milner, H. V. (2026) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.70061 · Cited by 4
Bustamante, C. M. V., Coombs, G., Rahimi-Eichi, H., Mair, P., Onnela, J.-P. “., Baker, J. T., & Buckner, R. L. (2024) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/53441 · Cited by 6
“…within a region of practical equivalence (ROPE), defined as parameter values that are sufficiently close to 0 to be considered equivalent to the null for practical purposes [49] and mathematically defined as a standardized effect size of 0.1 (ie, half of a small effect as defined by Cohen [50]).”
BackgroundInfluentialWirtz, M. A. (2024) · Linguistics Vanguard · doi:10.1515/lingvan-2023-0069 · Cited by 4
A Tale of Two Suggestions: Action and Diagnosis Recommendations for Responding to Robot Failure
Banerjee, S., Gombolay, M., & Chernova, S. (2020) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man47096.2020.9223545 · Cited by 4
“ROPE is set based on recommendations by Kruschke [27]. tions), CDX captures participants’ likelihood of following those suggestions and is a measure of operator compliance with decision support [28].”
MethodMode Effects’ Challenge to Authorship Attribution
Wang, H., Riddell, A. B., & Juola, P. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.97 · Cited by 4
The Use of the Posterior Probability in Score Differencing
Sinharay, S., & Johnson, M. (2020) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/1076998620957423 · Cited by 4
“The concept of practically equal to is borrowed from the concept underlying the region of practical equivalence (ROPE), indifference zone, and region of equivalence (e.g., Carlin & Louis, 2008; Kruschke, 2018).”
BackgroundPuri, R., & Hinder, M. R. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/na96e · Cited by 4
A fully automated, transparent, reproducible, and blind protocol for sequential analysesPreprint
Beffara, B., Bret, A., & Nalborczyk, L. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/v7xpg · Cited by 4
Dopamine regulates decision thresholds in human reinforcement learningPreprint
Chakroun, K., Wiehler, A., Wagner, B., Mathar, D., Ganzer, F., van Eimeren, T., Sommer, T., & Peters, J. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.09.29.509499 · Cited by 4
Traces of Human Attitudes in Contemporary and Historical Word Embeddings (1800-2000)Preprint
Morehouse, K. N., Rouduri, V., Cunningham, W., & Charlesworth, T. E. S. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2922677/v1 · Cited by 4
Mild traumatic brain injury alters function in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a TMS-EEG study
Moore, E., Webb, E., Sasaki, R., Rogasch, N. C., Foo, N., Semmler, J. G., & Opie, G. M. (2025) · doi:10.1101/2025.05.22.655676 · Cited by 3
“No decision was made if the 89% HDI partially overlapped ROPE (Kruschke 2018, Puri et al. 2023, Opie et al. 2024).”
Weusten, J. J. A. M., Kim, J. Y., Giacoletti, K. E. D., Vázquez, J., & Santos, P. D. L. (2024) · Journal of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1080/02664763.2023.2297150 · Cited by 3
“The literature provides examples in which Bayesian approaches are employed in comparing multiple means [6,16], for equivalence testing of two group means [10,11,21], and for omnibus non-inferiority testing for ANOVA and linear regression analyses [3].”
Ong, A. D., Wilcox, K. T., Reid, M. C., Wethington, E., Cintron, D. W., Addington, E. L., Goktas, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/54678 · Cited by 5
van Alebeek, H., Kahveci, S., Wiers, R., & Blechert, J. (2025) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2025.113333 · Cited by 3
Holder, N. D., Batten, A. J., Shiner, B. R., & Maguen, S. (2025) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.08.008 · Cited by 3
From eye to cortex: Tracing the neurocognitive dynamics of bilingual novel word acquisition
Fu, Y., Yang, J., Margaretto, B. B., Wang, H., Jan-Cordón, D. E., & Domı́nguez, A. (2025) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2025.105632 · Cited by 3
Pan, Z., Tan, H., Liu, S., & Fang, X. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104836 · Cited by 3
Jones, A. L., Kordsmeyer, T. L., Kramer, R. S. S., Stern, J., & Penke, L. (2025) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2025.106781 · Cited by 4
“Second, a Bayesian analysis delivers the probability of a hypothesis, given the data, in contrast to the probability of the data given the null hypothesis (Kruschke, 2018).”
InfluentialLow socioeconomic status amplifies the perceived rarity of large rewards
Ciranka, S., Chevallier, C., & Nettle, D. (2025) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106409 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Kruschke, J. K.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kruschke, John K.
- ORCID
- Kruschke, John K.
- Venue
- Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-05-08
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 270-280
- ISSN
- 2515-2459 (ISSN-L)
- 2515-2467
- OpenAlex
- W2801776818
- Cited by
- 734
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 99 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 128 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 10
- FWCI
- 41.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks Open (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- Bayesian hypothesis testing, null hypothesis rejection, highest density interval, region of practical equivalence, posterior distribution, decision threshold, p-values, Bayes factor, parameter values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review