The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rejecting or Accepting Parameter Values in Bayesian Estimation
Open accessAbstract
This article explains a decision rule that uses Bayesian posterior distributions as the basis for accepting or rejecting null values of parameters. This decision rule focuses on the range of plausible values indicated by the highest density interval of the posterior distribution and the relation between this range and a region of practical equivalence (ROPE) around the null value. The article also discusses considerations for setting the limits of a ROPE and emphasizes that analogous considerations apply to setting the decision thresholds for p values and Bayes factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“There is no uniquely correct ROPE; however, by convention, the ROPE range is often set at half the size of Cohen’s definition of small effect size (i.e. 0.2 [306];) resulting in ROPE values of ±0.1 and ±0.05 for standardized mean differences (e.g. Cohen’s d = group 1 mean – group 2 mean/pooled standard deviation) and standardized regression coefficients (i.e. sβ = coefficient from a regression on”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 · Cited by 12,558
The ASA Statement on p -Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108 · Cited by 6,306 · cited 1×
“Discrete decisions should be avoided if possible, because such decisions encourage people to ignore the magnitude of the parameter value and its uncertainty (e.g., Cumming, 2014; Kruschke & Liddell, 2018b; Wasserstein & Lazar, 2016, and many references cited therein).”
BackgroundJAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling
Plummer, M. (2003) · Cited by 4,720
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
The New Statistics: Why and How
Cumming, G. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613504966 · Cited by 3,200
Bayes, T. (1763) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London · doi:10.1098/rstl.1763.0053 · Cited by 3,023
AN ESSAY TOWARDS SOLVING A PROBLEM IN THE DOCTRINE OF CHANCES
BAYES (1958) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/45.3-4.296 · Cited by 2,939
Redefine statistical significance
Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Berk, R., Bollen, K. A., Brembs, B., Brown, L., Camerer, C., et al. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z · Cited by 2,772
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Jeffreys H., 1961, Theory of probability
- Lakens D., 2017, t, 8, 355
- Lesaffre E., 2008, Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 66, 150
- Little T. A., 2015, BioPharm International, 28, 45
- Westlake W. J., 1981, Biometrics, 37, 591
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 742
Predicting Lockean from gradational accuracy
Douven, I., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2026) · International Journal of Approximate Reasoning · doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2026.109636 · Cited by 3
Diazepam alters the shape of alpha oscillations recorded from human cortex using EEG
Opie, G. M., Schaworonkow, N., Gordon, P. C., Humaidan, D., & Ziemann, U. (2026) · Imaging Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag.a.1169 · Cited by 3
“For the current study, ROPE was defined as ± 5% of the standard deviation for the data being compared ( Kruschke, 2018).”
Mosia, M., & Nannim, F. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1803423 · Cited by 3
Jiménez-Crespo, M. A., & Casillas, J. V. (2021) · Translation Cognition & Behavior · doi:10.1075/tcb.00048.jim · Cited by 3
Berlin, J., Wallinius, M., Nilsson, T., Karlén, M. H., & Delfin, C. (2023) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-023-04609-y · Cited by 4
“Our choice of a 90% interval is in line with recommendations for how to quantify uncertainties in everyday language [68], and thus a 90% HDI may be interpreted such that there is a 90% probability, or “very likely” in non-mathematical terms, that the parameter estimate falls within its range [69].”
MethodSchreiber, A., & Cawood, C. D. (2023) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.05.065 · Cited by 5
Equivalence testing for multiple groups
Pourmohamad, T., & Lee, H. K. H. (2024) · Stat · doi:10.1002/sta4.645 · Cited by 3
“…multigroup testing, in the case of k ¼ 2 groups, all of the aforementioned methodology can still be used, and our testing strategy reduces to the well-known region of practical equivalence (ROPE) procedure of Kruschke (2018) when a 100 ð 1 (cid:1) α Þ % highest posterior density interval is used.”
BackgroundMethodParrish, K. (2024) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263124000342 · Cited by 3
“For example, Bayesian methods can establish a region of practical equivalence and compare it with the highest density interval to provide evidence of equivalence (Kruschke, 2018).”
Muehlensiepen, F., Petit, P., Knitza, J., Welcker, M., & Vuillerme, N. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/47733 · Cited by 3
“This variable selection was based on the ROPE (region of practical equivalence) percentage (ROPE% ≤ 5) [17-19], and a subsequent selection based on the variance inflation factor (VIF) [20].”
Larrat, S., Lesage, V. S., Michaud, R., & Lair, S. (2024) · Diseases of Aquatic Organisms · doi:10.3354/dao03812 · Cited by 4
What Matters When Providing Conversational Recast Treatment? A Multilevel Modeling Analysis
Tucci, A., Sachs, A., Burton, R., Vance, R., & Plante, E. (2025) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2024_ajslp-24-00138 · Cited by 3
Lee, D., Allen, A. J., Lovell, A., Abdelsabour, A., Wilson, E., & Meléndez‐Torres, G. J. (2025) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2025.05.003 · Cited by 3
Perceived Remorse and Education: Their Impact on Mock Juror Judgements of Autistic Individuals
Burleigh, L., Weber, N., Lim, A., & Young, R. L. (2025) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-025-06982-x · Cited by 3
Rognli, E. W., Waraan, L., Czajkowski, N., & Aalberg, M. (2021) · Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology · doi:10.21307/sjcapp-2021-004 · Cited by 4
Kelter, R. (2021) · Statistics in Biosciences · doi:10.1007/s12561-021-09326-2 · Cited by 5
“To facilitate the shift to an estimation-oriented perspective, Kruschke and Liddell [24] advertised the region of practical equivalence (ROPE).”
BackgroundInfluentialThomson, M. A., Belsha, D., Nedelkopoulou, N., Sharma, S., Campbell, D., Narula, P., Rao, P., Urs, A., D'Ambrosio, A., & Isoldi, S. (2022) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000003421 · Cited by 3
“The statistical significance of the findings was summarised by the probability of direction (pD) (17) and by the probability of the region of practical equivalence (pROPE) for both ATEs and HTEs (16).”
MethodBiggs, A. T., Suss, J., Sherwood, S., Hamilton, J. A., & Olson, T. M. (2022) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5406/19398298.135.2.06 · Cited by 3
Temporal distortion for angry faces: Testing visual attention and action preparation accounts
Tipples, J., Lupton, M., & George, D. N. (2023) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218231172856 · Cited by 3
Detecting Isotachophoresis Zones Hidden in Noise Using Signal Processing
Bonart, H., Gebhard, F., Hecht, L., Roy, T., Liebchen, B., & Hardt, S. (2023) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.3c00321 · Cited by 3
Practice beats age: co-activation shapes heritage speakers’ lexical access more than age of onset
Sagarra, N., & Casillas, J. V. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1141174 · Cited by 3
“…et al., 2017).3 In most cases, we used the following formula to establish a region of practical equivalence (ROPE) around a point null value (see Kruschke, 2018): ROPE = − + µ µ σ σ 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 We report mean posterior point estimates for parameters of interest, along with the 95% highest…”
MethodHuang, L., Hou, Y., Chen, Y., You, X., Proctor, R. W., Francis, G., & Chang, M. (2023) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104048 · Cited by 3
Behavioural response to gastrointestinal parasites of yearling dairy calves at pasture
Bates, A., Fan, B., Greer, A. W., Rh, B., & Doughty, A. (2024) · New Zealand Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1080/00480169.2024.2351128 · Cited by 3
“Parameter estimates were expressed in terms of the median and the 95% highest density interval (HDI) of the parameter ’ s probability distribution (Kruschke 2018; Makowski et al .”
Omar, M., Omar, M., Nassar, S., Lahat, A., & Sharif, Κ. (2024) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines12071429 · Cited by 4
Minimal Detectable Change of Cough and Lingual Strength Outcomes in Neurodegenerative Disease
Borders, J. C., & Troche, M. S. (2024) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.31654 · Cited by 3
“41,42 Evaluating whether the magnitude of an effect is meaningful or equivalent, instead of whether the effect is simply different from zero (i.e., p -value), is arguably more interesting and impactful from both clinical and theoretical perspectives.”
The role of articulatory rehearsal in short-term false memories during ageing
Piroelle, M., Guette, C., & Abadie, M. (2024) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218241269320 · Cited by 3
“Nevertheless, we performed Bayesian analyses in which evidence of a null effect is equally informative (Kruschke, 2011, 2018), and Type I error does not increase with optional stopping (Rouder, 2014).”
Hirshberg, M. J., Flook, L., Sundaram-Stukel, R., & Davidson, R. J. (2021) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101396 · Cited by 6
Marôco, J. L., Angarten, V. G., Pinto, R., Santos, V., Fernhall, B., Clara, S., & Melo, X. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0317212 · Cited by 3
Kim, K. M., Bornstein, M., Liu, X., & Li, Y. (2025) · Research Methods in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100242 · Cited by 3
Walkenhorst, B., Gonçalves, I. B., Drea, C. M., & Manser, M. B. (2025) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2025.105814 · Cited by 2
Intrinsic Neural Timescales Relate to Event-Related Activity—Key Role for Intracolumnar Connections
Çatal, Y., Wolman, A., Buccellato, A., Keskin, K., & Northoff, G. (2025) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0896-25.2025 · Cited by 3
Chronic Effects of a Training Program Using a Nasal Inspiratory Restriction Device on Elite Cyclists
Montesinos, J. L. G., Fernández‐Santos, J. R., Pardal, C. V., Aragón-Martín, R., Muñoz, A. V. A., Reina-Novo, J., Orantes-González, E., Heredia‐Jimenez, J., & Ponce‐González, J. G. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18020777 · Cited by 3
“The null value in our analysis is 0, so if this number is not inside the 95%HDI then we can reject that value for practical purposes [23].”
BackgroundUncovering Category Representations with Linked MCMC with People.
León-Villagrá, P., Otsubo, K. S., Lucas, C., & Buchsbaum, D. (2020) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 3
Profitability of Momentum Strategies: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam
Nguyen, Y. T. H., & Hoang, M. D. (2021) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77094-5_47 · Cited by 3
Bret, A., Beffara, B., Mierop, A., & Mermillod, M. (2021) · Social Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.32872/spb.6593 · Cited by 3
“Parameter values < |0.13| are considered practically equiva lent to 0 ( Kruschke, 2018).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSidhu, D. M., & Vigliocco, G. (2022) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-022-02224-8 · Cited by 3
“Here we conducted a region of practical equivalence ( ROPE ) analysis (see Kruschke, 2018) via the “bayestestR” package in R (Makowski et al., 2019).”
Non-selective response inhibition in equiprobable Go/NoGo task: Bayesian analysis of fMRI dataPreprint
Masharipov, R. S., Korotkov, A., Medvedev, S., & Kireev, M. V. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/823625 · Cited by 4
“…in the supplementary materials): If the effect value falls within the interval [−γ; γ] with a probability of α = 0.95, then the hypothesis of the null “NoGo = Go” effect will be accepted, supporting the practical equivalence (Kruschke, 2018) of the BOLD signal between compared conditions (see Fig.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWeijs, M. L., Daum, M. M., & Lenggenhager, B. (2022) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.31234/osf.io/d4yu2 · Cited by 12
Socialness Effects in Lexical-Semantic ProcessingPreprint
Diveica, V., Muraki, E. J., Binney, R. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ek5a3 · Cited by 3
Divergence in genetic (co)variances and the alignment of gmax with phenotypic divergence
Jarvis, W. M. C., Careau, V., & Rundle, H. D. (2025) · Evolution · doi:10.1093/evolut/qpaf009 · Cited by 2
Gelpí, R., Tang, Y., Jackson, E., & Cunningham, W. A. (2025) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf076 · Cited by 2
Fitch, A. S., Mara, J. K., Hetherington, M., Mahony, K. E., Drew, M. K., & Waddington, G. S. (2025) · Health Science Reports · doi:10.1002/hsr2.70654 · Cited by 2
Tan, J., Rowe, G., Puri, R., Needham, M., Marneweck, M., Radia, S., & Vallence, A. (2025) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-025-05904-0 · Cited by 2
“…both the HDI and ROPE, the percentage of HDI falling within the ROPE (% of HDI in ROPE) is reported and the following decision rule is applied (Kruschke 2018): if the HDI entirely falls within the ROPE, the null hypothesis of no effect (H 0 ) is accepted; if it completely falls outside the…”
Dössegger, A., Zberg, L., Gsponer, T., Faude, O., Gerber, M., Flück, M., Wyss, T., & Protte, C. (2025) · Military Medicine · doi:10.1093/milmed/usaf488 · Cited by 2
How people decide to consume (more) alcohol when feeling stressed
Dora, J., Shinn, M., Copeland, A., Neilson, E. C., Weiss, N. H., Witkiewitz, K. A., Murphy, J. G., Field, M., George, W. H., & King, K. M. (2025) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.70213 · Cited by 2
Diving behavior of juvenile green turtles in shallow habitats in the Bahamas
Doñate‐Ordóñez, R., Chatzievangelou, D., Mills, S., Reyes‐González, J. M., & Robinson, N. J. (2025) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps15080 · Cited by 2
Guichet, C., Achard, S., Mermillod, M., & Baciu, M. V. (2025) · Imaging Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag.a.1091 · Cited by 4
“Using the bayestestR package (version 0.13.2; Makowski et al., 2019), we conducted a practical equivalence test ( Kruschke, 2018) with a 89% highest density interval (HDI) to test whether whole-brain energy remained stable across the lifespan.”
InfluentialStefano, N. D., Ansani, A., Focaroli, V., Borsella, R., Formenti, G., Velardi, A., Schiavio, A., & Spence, C. J. (2026) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-025-02804-4 · Cited by 2
“After fitting the Bayesian MMNL, we extracted posterior draws for all associations and applied the HDI+ROPE decision rule (Kruschke, 2018); that is, we assessed how much of the 89% Highest Density Interval (HDI) fell within the ROPE.”
Dey, R., Coenen, A. R., Solonenko, N., Burris, M., Mackey, A. I., Galasso, J., Sun, C. L., Demory, D., Muratore, D., Beckett, S. J., et al. (2026) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1093/ismejo/wrag041 · Cited by 2
“We compared the traits using a Bayesian test for equivalence [48] and the posterior probability of practical equivalence, p eq , is defined through a prespecified region of equivalence (analogous to P value).”
Similar eye movements in aphantasia and visualizers during mental map exploration
Takamura, Y., Coustaty, S., Liu, J., Razzak, E., Pouget, P., Spagna, A., & Bartolomeo, P. (2026) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2026.06.010 · Cited by 2
Hoffman, A. S., Tutterow, A. M., Gade, M. R., Adams, B. T., & Peterman, W. E. (2021) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.3809 · Cited by 2
Luna, K., Cadavid, S. E., & Botía, I. (2022) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-022-01305-2 · Cited by 2
“Instead, we conducted Bayesian analyses and report Bayes factors (BFs; for tutorials on Bayesian analyses for psychologists, see Jarosz & Wiley, 2014; Kruschke, 2018; and Wagenmakers et al., 2018).2 Bayesian analyses compare two hypotheses and can provide evidence in support of either of them.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialUncertainty in grid data: a theory and comprehensive robustness test
Suzuki, A. (2022) · Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology · doi:10.1007/s11135-022-01555-x · Cited by 2
On the Performance of Bayesian Generalized Dissimilarity Model Estimator
Lusiana, E. D., Astutik, S., Nurjannah, N., & Sambah, A. B. (2023) · Mathematics and Statistics · doi:10.13189/ms.2023.110118 · Cited by 2
Replication of "null results" - Absence of evidence or evidence of absence?
Pawel, S., Heyard, R., Micheloud, C., & Held, L. (2023) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.04587 · Cited by 2
“…advanced meth-ods for quantifying evidence for absent effects which could potentially improve on the more basic approaches considered here ( Lindley, 1998 ; Johnson and Rossell, 2010 ; Morey and Rouder, 2011 ; Kruschke, 2018 ; Stahel, 2021 ; Micheloud and Held, 2023 ; Izbicki et al., 2023 ).”
BackgroundLi, Q. (2023) · Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences · doi:10.2478/amns.2023.2.00112 · Cited by 2
Zou, L., Fazia, T., Guo, H., & Berzuini, C. (2024) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-023-02067-4 · Cited by 2
“The value of T should in principle be chosen in such a way that ROPE contains values of β that have small enough absolute magnitudes to be devoid of practical relevance (Kruschke [5]).”
BackgroundMethodFu, Y., Álvarez, C. J., Margaretto, B. B., Afonso, O., Wang, H., & Domı́nguez, A. (2024) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728924000087 · Cited by 2
“To assess our a priori hypotheses, a region of practical equivalence (ROPE) around a point null value of 0 (Kruschke, 2018) was established by using the following formula: In general, we reported four statistics to describe the posterior distribution for each parameter of interest, including 1)…”
MethodWirtz, M. A., & Fischlhammer, L. (2024) · Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik · doi:10.1515/zfal-2024-2006 · Cited by 2
Recurrent involuntary memories and mind wandering are related but distinct
Yeung, R. C., & Fernandes, M. A. (2024) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-024-01961-w · Cited by 5
“We calculated 95% highest density intervals (HDIs) for nonsignificant predictors and adopted the HDI + ROPE decision rule (Harms & Lakens, 2018 ; Kruschke, 2018 ), such that if 100% of the 95% HDI was within the ROPE, we accepted that a difference was equivalent to zero for practi - cal purposes.”
InfluentialEvent centrality in social anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder
Vermeulen, M., Gandhi, A., Eede, F. V. D., Raes, F., & Krans, J. (2024) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2024.2341706 · Cited by 2
“Correlation coe ffi cients with 95% highest-density intervals (HDI) are reported (Kruschke, 2018).”
Leivesley, J. A., & Rollinson, N. (2024) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/oik.10706 · Cited by 2
Elsey, J. W. B., Manheim, D., Marsh, A. A., Schmit, V. L., & Moss, D. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0307808 · Cited by 2
Lassance, R. F. L., Izbicki, R., & Stern, R. B. (2024) · International Journal of Approximate Reasoning · doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2024.109332 · Cited by 2
Ng, H. K. S. (2024) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12845 · Cited by 2
Wirtz, M. A., Pickl, S., & Pfenninger, S. E. (2025) · Open Linguistics · doi:10.1515/opli-2024-0037 · Cited by 2
Lebensereignisse im Bildungsbereich als Erklärung für individuellen Sprachwandel
Wirtz, M. A., & Vergeiner, P. C. (2025) · Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik · doi:10.1515/zfal-2025-2006 · Cited by 2
Processing pronunciation variation with independently mappable allophones
Soo, R., & Babel, M. (2025) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2025.101402 · Cited by 2
White, L. A., Travers, S. K., McAllister, D., Lawrie, K., & Gorrod, E. J. (2025) · Pacific Conservation Biology · doi:10.1071/pc24081 · Cited by 2
King, K. M., Dora, J., Schultz, M. E., McCabe, C. J., Lee, C. M., Shoda, Y., Fairlie, A. M., Litt, D., Lewis, M. A., Patrick, M. E., et al. (2025) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/adb0001074 · Cited by 2
Exposure to Different Levels of Visual Complexity Influences Judgments of Complexity and Liking
Sun, X., Che, J., Leder, H., & Nadal, M. (2025) · Empirical Studies of the Arts · doi:10.1177/02762374251391644 · Cited by 2
“The ± 0.18 ROPE range is appropriate for logistic models, as it corresponds to an odds ratio of approximately 1.20, equivalent to a negligible effect size (Kruschke, 2018; Kruschke & Liddell, 2018).”
InfluentialKireev, M. V., Masharipov, R. S., Korotkov, A. D., & Medvedev, S. V. (2021) · Human Physiology · doi:10.1134/s0362119721050066 · Cited by 2
“If an effect falls within the range [–γ; γ] (region of practical equivalence (ROPE)) with a probability higher than 95%, the null hypothesis that the effect is absent is accepted [9, 22], suggesting practical equivalence of local neuronal activity for the samples compared.”
BackgroundPavlovian-to-instrumental transfer in intertemporal choice
Burghoorn, F., Heuvelmans, V., Scheres, A., Karin Roelofs, A., & Figner, B. (2024) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/jdm.2023.42 · Cited by 2
Zhang, Y., Lai, M. H. C., & Palardy, G. J. (2022) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000455 · Cited by 2
Arguing Practical Significance in Software Engineering Using Bayesian Data Analysis.Preprint
Torkar, R., FELDT, R. H., & Furia, C. A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 3
PiNCeR: a corpus of cued-rate multiple picture naming in DutchPreprint
Rodd, J., Bosker, H. R., ten Bosch, L., Ernestus, M., & Meyer, A. S. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/wyc6h · Cited by 2
“The model also confirmed that there was no effect of experiment, since all 95% credible intervals included 0, and all effect sizes were small (Cohen’s d minimally 0.061, maximally 0.168), and all 95% credible intervals overlapped with a ROPE (region of practical equivalence; Kruschke, 2018) defined to include all effe…”
BackgroundInfluentialBuilding comprehension to enhance vaccination intentions: Evidence from the United States and ItalyPreprint
Porumbescu, G., Cucciniello, M., Pin, P., & Melegaro, A. (2020) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.06.05.20122986 · Cited by 2
Suzuki, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.07478 · Cited by 2
Hoffman, A. S., Tutterow, A. M., Gade, M. R., Adams, B. T., & Peterman, W. E. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.12.03.410290 · Cited by 2
Xie, J., She, H., Chen, X., Zhang, H., & Niu, Y. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Civil Aviation Safety and Information Technology (ICCASIT) · doi:10.1109/iccasit50869.2020.9368652 · Cited by 2
Children's failure to control variables may reflect adaptive decision makingPreprint
Jones, A. P., Bramley, N. R., Gureckis, T. M., & Ruggeri, A. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/9qv5y · Cited by 2
Do voices carry valid information about a speaker's personality?Preprint
Stern, J., Schild, C., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Hahn, A. C., Puts, D. A., Zettler, I., Kordsmeyer, T. L., Feinberg, D. R., Zamfir, D., et al. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/9a68c · Cited by 2
Exploring the relationship between anthropomorphism and Theory-of-Mind in brain and behaviourPreprint
Hortensius, R., Kent, M., Darda, K. M., Jastrzab, L. E., Koldewyn, K., Ramsey, R., & Cross, E. S. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/3uj4g · Cited by 2
Opie, G. M., Hughes, J. M., & Puri, R. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.10.16.562636 · Cited by 2
“Within the current study, this was set as ± 5% of the standard deviation (SD)(Kruschke 2018).”
MethodDoes early-stage Alzheimer’s disease affect the dynamics of motor adaptation?Preprint
Sutter, K., Wijdenes, L. O., van Beers, R. J., Claassen, J., Kessels, R. P. C., & Medendorp, W. P. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.01.16.575820 · Cited by 2
“We tested the ROPE for each parameter separately using the formula (Kruschke, 2018): ROPE = ±0.1�(𝜎𝜎 + 𝜎𝜎 )/2 in which and are the variances of the posterior distributions of the two groups.”
MethodInfluentialPrediction tendency, eye movements, and attention in a unified framework of neural speech trackingPreprint
Schubert, J., Gehmacher, Q., Schmidt, F., Hartmann, T., & Weisz, N. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.101262.1 · Cited by 2
bayesics: Bayesian Analyses for One- and Two-Sample Inference and Regression Methods
Sewell, D. K., & Arakkal, A. T. (2026) · doi:10.32614/cran.package.bayesics · Cited by 2
Suzuki, A. (2022) · Statistics and Public Policy · doi:10.1080/2330443x.2022.2050328 · Cited by 1
“…of such a statistical estimate: whether a p-value is smaller than 5% or a 95% confidence/credible interval does not include zero to reject the null hypothesis; and whether the size of a causal effect is substantively significant to indicate practical relevance (Gross 2015; Kruschke 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialCapturing Regional Differences in Flood Vulnerability Improves Flood Loss Estimation
Sairam, N., Schröter, K., Steinhausen, M., & Kreibich, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Water · doi:10.3389/frwa.2022.817625 · Cited by 1
“The significance of the model structure (linear relationship) is measured using the threshold based on the Region Of Practical Equivalence (ROPE) for Bayesian models (Kruschke, 2018).”
MethodInvestigating the relationship between the Bayes factor and the separation of credible intervals
Wei, Z., Nathoo, F. S., & Masson, M. E. J. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02295-1 · Cited by 1
“…et al. (2021) compared the classification performance of three approaches, namely, (1) two one-sided tests, (2) HDI-region of practical equivalence (Kruschke, 2018), and (3) interval Bayes factor, in a balanced independent-samples t -test, with respect to type I error rate ( α ) and statistical…”
TH-stopping in Philadelphia Puerto Rican English
Patchell, A. E., & Berry, G. (2024) · Language Variation and Change · doi:10.1017/s0954394524000012
Sterner, P., Friemelt, B., Goretzko, D., Kraus, E. B., Bühner, M., & Pargent, F. (2024) · Diagnostica · doi:10.1026/0012-1924/a000329 · Cited by 1
Error modulates categorization of subsecond durations in multitasking contexts
Rafiezadeh, M., Tashk, A., Mafi, F., Hosseinzadeh, P., Sheibani, V., & Ghasemian, S. (2024) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-024-01945-w · Cited by 1
“In instances with more than 5% of the 95% HDI within the ROPE, we accepted the alternative hypothesis if the 95% HDI did not contain the null value (center of the ROPE or zero) (Kruschke, 2018).”
Probabilistic Analysis of English Dative Constructions in Academic Writings of English EFL Learners
Bozdağ, F. Ü. (2024) · Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.31261/tapsla.13902 · Cited by 1
Medvedev, S. V., Masharipov, R. S., Korotkov, A. D., & Kireev, M. V. (2023) · Human Physiology · doi:10.31857/s0131164622700175 · Cited by 1
Pharyngealization in Tashlhiyt from kinematic and acoustic perspectives
Buech, P., Hermes, A., & Rachid Ridouane, B. (2024) · Laboratory Phonology Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology · doi:10.16995/labphon.16727 · Cited by 1
Hauenstein, C. E., Thomas, R. P., Illingworth, D. A., & Dougherty, M. R. P. (2024) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976241266481 · Cited by 2
“Kruschke (2018) recommended the following heuristics for interpreting the ROPE: Accept the null hypothesis when the posterior proportions are 1, reject it when the proportions are 0, and refrain from making a decision for practical purposes (because of the uncertainty in the data) when the…”
Feeling good, approaching the positive
Kobrock, K., Solzbacher, J., Gotzner, N., & Peter König, B. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1491612 · Cited by 1
“The ROPE region of (0.”
InfluentialSpatial, occupational, and age-related effects on reported variation in colloquial German
Wirtz, M. A., Pickl, S., Niehaus, K., Elspaß, S., & Möller, R. (2024) · Language Variation and Change · doi:10.1017/s0954394524000188 · Cited by 1
“In interpreting the effects, we established a region of practical equivalence (ROPE) of ± 0.05 around the point null value 0, which is a region/interval that is practically equivalent to zero (Kruschke, 2018).”
InfluentialLópez‐Laval, I., Sitko, S., Cantonero, J., Alejandro, L. A., & Cirer-Sastre, R. (2025) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2024.2449314 · Cited by 1
“…the region of practical equivalence (ROPE), set to [−0.1, 0.1], where values were interpreted as >99% negligible (null hypothesis acceptance), >97.5% probably negligible, 2.5%-97.5% undecided significance, 2.5% probably significant, and 1% significant (null hypothesis rejection) (Kruschke, 2018).”
InfluentialBiedermann, D., Breitwieser, J., Nobbe, L., Drachsler, H., & Brod, G. (2025) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102641 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Kruschke, J. K.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kruschke, John K.
- ORCID
- Kruschke, John K.
- Venue
- Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-05-08
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 270-280
- ISSN
- 2515-2459 (ISSN-L)
- 2515-2467
- OpenAlex
- W2801776818
- Cited by
- 734
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 99 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 128 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 10
- FWCI
- 41.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks Open (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- Bayesian hypothesis testing, null hypothesis rejection, highest density interval, region of practical equivalence, posterior distribution, decision threshold, p-values, Bayes factor, parameter values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review