Cited by 3Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pivotal trial of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy for early Alzheimer's disease: Rationale and design

Open access

Abstract

Background: There are lines of evidence suggesting that cerebral microcirculatory dysfunction is involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). We have developed a low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) therapy that upregulates endothelial NO synthase with therapeutic angiogenesis. We demonstrated that the LIPUS therapy ameliorates cognitive declines in mouse models of AD and tended to do so in patients with early AD (mild AD and mild cognitive impairment due to AD) in the pilot trial. Thus, the Japanese government has designated our LIPUS device as the first breakthrough medical device in Japan. Objective: We are performing a pivotal clinical trial (LIPUS-AD) to finally address the efficacy and safety of our LIPUS therapy in patients with early AD in Japan. Methods: LIPUS-AD is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, in which a total of 220 patients with early AD, who are positive for amyloid-β (Aβ) PET, will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion. The LIPUS therapy is performed for the whole brain for one hour 3 times a week as one session under the special conditions (32 cycles, 0.5 MHz, 0.25 W/cm 2 ). It is performed for 6 sessions with 3-month intervals in the LIPUS group for 72 weeks, while the placebo group receives placebo therapy. Before and at 72 weeks of the trial, all subjects undergo brain Aβ PET and MRI and 9 cognitive functions tests. The primary efficacy endpoint is the changes in ADAS-J-cog-14 scores from baseline to 72 weeks. Conclusions: LIPUS-AD addresses efficacy and safety of the LIPUS therapy in patients with early AD. Clinical Trial Gov. No.: NCT05983575

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/25424823241312108

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32205-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.1072994 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Cummings J, Lee G, Ritter A, et al. Alzheimer’s disease drug development pipeline: 2020. Transl Res Clin Interv 2020; 6: 1–29.
  4. 10.1056/NEJMoa2212948 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1056/NEJMoa2100708 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00463-8 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1111/apha.12646 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu427 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/eurheartj/eht544 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.222 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.3400/avd.ra.20-00010 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae253 · DOI
  13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0104863 · DOI
  14. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.306477 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/cvr/cvaa221 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.brs.2018.05.012 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/s41598-021-84473-6 · DOI
  18. 10.1620/tjem.2022.J078 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16499-4 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.14283/jpad.2018.2 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/med/9780199655946.001.0001 · DOI
  22. 10.1176/appi.books.9781585628940 · DOI
  23. 10.1155/2020/5086250 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/RBME.2018.2796598 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/brb3.2850 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s00259-024-06631-y · DOI
  27. 10.3233/JAD-1998-1205 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106114 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s10396-023-01382-z · DOI
  30. 10.1007/s10396-024-01461-9 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Shimokawa, H., Akishita, M., Ihara, M., Teramukai, S., Ishiki, A., Nagai, Y., & Fukushima, M.
Affiliations
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
  • National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center (JP)
  • Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (JP)
  • Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University (JP)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Learning Health Society Institute, Nagoya, Japan
Corresponding author
Shimokawa, Hiroaki
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Reports
Published
2025-01-13
Volume
9
Pages
25424823241312108-25424823241312108
ISSN
2542-4823 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406334905
Cited by
3
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Fiducia
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
low-intensity pulsed ultrasound, Alzheimer's disease, early Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, cerebral microcirculation, therapeutic angiogenesis, endothelial nitric oxide synthase, amyloid PET, cognitive decline

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review