Cited by 536Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Failure to demonstrate efficacy of aducanumab: An analysis of the EMERGE and ENGAGE trials as reported by Biogen, December 2019

Open access
Knopman, David S., Jones, David T., Greicius, Michael D.·2021·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

Aducanumab recently underwent two large phase III clinical trials that were stopped prematurely by the sponsor Biogen. One trial was trending positive while the other showed no benefits from aducanumab. Post hoc analyses led the sponsor to assert that there was a sufficient efficacy signal to justify a new drug application as a treatment for Alzheimer's disease. The sponsor claimed that subsets of participants receiving sufficiently high doses of aducanumab demonstrated benefits in both trials. In contrast, we identified alternative accounts for the apparent drug benefits in post hoc subgroups that are unrelated to dose effects. Biomarker data were consistent with target engagement, but no evidence was presented to correlate biomarker changes to cognitive benefits. Our analysis supports the conduct of a third, phase III trial with high‐dose aducanumab. Aducanumab's efficacy as a treatment for the cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease cannot be proven by clinical trials with divergent outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/alz.12213

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The FDA granted accelerated approval to aducanumab and stated that reduction of amyloid is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit.

    “The FDA has controversially granted accelerated approval to aducanumab and has opined that the reduction of amyloid is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit 7,9,[98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107] .”
  • The FDA granted expedited approval of aducanumab on the grounds of the EMERGE trial's documented decrease in amyloid levels.

    “In spite of this, the FDA granted expedited approval on the grounds of the EMERGE trial’s documented decrease in amyloid levels [132,185,186,187].”
  • Aducanumab demonstrated inconsistent outcomes in its two main Phase III clinical trials, EMERGE and ENGAGE.

    “Aducanumab demonstrated inconsistent outcomes in its two main clinical trials, the Phase III EMERGE and ENGAGE research investigations.”
  • In the EMERGE trial, participants with AD at risk for cognitive deterioration showed a decrease in amyloid-beta plaques.

    “In the EMERGE experiment, when participants with AD were at risk for cognitive deterioration, there was a decrease in the amount of amyloid-beta plaques.”
  • Aducanumab is considered controversial due to lack of sufficient evidence to support its efficacy.

    “However, it is considered controversial due to the lack of sufficient evidence to support its efficacy.348,349”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knopman, D. S., Jones, D. T., & Greicius, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Knopman, David S.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-11
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
696-701
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W3097527510
Cited by
524
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 151 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 4
FWCI
51.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
aducanumab, Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Amyloid, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Biomarkers, Treatment Outcome, Treatment Failure, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review