Efficacy and safety of focused ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) manifests as an insidiously progressive neurodegenerative pathology, wherein the current therapeutic armamentarium remains constrained to symptomatic management, highlighting an urgent need for innovative therapies. Objective: This meta-analysis systematically conducts an assessment of the safety and efficacy of focused ultrasound (FUS)-mediated reversible blood-brain barrier opening (BBBO) in AD, while further exploring its potential associations with cognitive function and amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition in patients. Methods: PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched in this study. The study protocol has been registered with PROSPERO (registration number, CRD42024585286). ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias, followed by further data analysis. Results: Fifty-seven AD patients from eight distinct clinical studies were systematically incorporated into the meta-analytical framework. The time span was from 2018 to 2023. After FUS-mediated BBBO, the analysis demonstrated significant outcomes of FUS for both safety (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.75–0.98, p < 0.01) and efficacy (OR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.61–1.00, p < 0.01). There was no deterioration of cognitive function after surgery, and the observed adverse events were minor and temporary in nature. Conclusions: This meta-analysis underscores the potential of FUS as a non-invasive, safe, and effective method for enhancing BBB permeability in AD patients, offering a promising avenue for targeted drug delivery and disease modification. Future multicenter studies with larger sample sizes and standardized methodologies are warranted to confirm these results and explore the integration of FUS with existing and emerging AD therapies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
Sterne, J. A., Hernán, M. A., Reeves, B. C., Savović, J., Berkman, N. D., Viswanathan, M., Henry, D., Altman, D. G., Ansari, M. T., Boutron, I., et al. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i4919 · Cited by 20,329 · see citing works
Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated
Thompson, S. G. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6965.1351 · Cited by 1,017 · see citing works
Noninvasive hippocampal blood-brain barrier opening in Alzheimer's disease with focused ultrasound.
Rezai, A. R., Ranjan, M., D’Haese, P.-F., Haut, M. W., Carpenter, J., Najib, U., Mehta, R. I., Chazen, J. L., Zibly, Z., Yates, J. R., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2002571117 · Cited by 365 · cited 5× · see citing works
“…the eight included studies likely increased inter-study variability — six studies used Magnetic Resonance-guided Focused Ultrasound (MRIgFUS), 19,20,22 – 25 one employed Neuronavigation-guided Focused Ultrasound (NgFUS), 21 and one utilized low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS).”
InfluentialBurgess, A., Dubey, S., Yeung, S., Hough, O., Eterman, N., Aubert, I., & Hynynen, K. (2014) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.14140245 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Current Strategies to Enhance Delivery of Drugs across the Blood–Brain Barrier
Teleanu, R. I., Preda, M. D., Niculescu, A.-G., Vladâcenco, O., Radu, C. I., Grumezescu, A. M., & Teleanu, D. M. (2022) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14050987 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Wang, J., Li, Z., Pan, M., Fiaz, M., Hao, Y., Yan, Y., Sun, L., & Yan, F. (2022) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2022.114539 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Bai, M., Lyv, H., Zhou, X., Zhang, Y., & Han, Z.
- Affiliations
- Anhui Medical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Han, Zhengyi
- Venue
- Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Reports
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2025-05-21
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 25424823251343789-25424823251343789
- ISSN
- 2542-4823 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12095960
- OpenAlex
- W4410561060
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Alzheimer s Disease Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, focused ultrasound, blood-brain barrier opening, blood-brain barrier permeability, amyloid-beta deposition, cognitive function, brain drug delivery, treatment safety, treatment efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review