Cited by 362Action Observation and SynchronizationTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesMotor Control and Adaptation

The essential role of Broca's area in imitation

Heiser, Marc, Iacoboni, Marco, Maeda, Fumiko, Marcus, Jake, Mazziotta, John C.·2003·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The posterior sector of Broca's area (Brodmann area 44), a brain region critical for language, may have evolved from neurons active during observation and execution of manual movements. Imaging studies showing increased Broca's activity during execution, imagination, imitation and observation of hand movements support this hypothesis. Increased Broca's activity in motor task, however, may simply be due to inner speech. To test whether Broca's area is essential to imitation, we used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), which is known to transiently disrupt functions in stimulated areas. Subjects imitated finger key presses (imitation) or executed finger key presses in response to spatial cues (control task). While performing the tasks, subjects received rTMS over the left and right pars opercularis of the inferior frontal gyrus (where Brodmann area 44 is probabilistically located) and over the occipital cortex. There was significant impairment in imitation, but not in the control task, during rTMS over left and right pars opercularis compared to rTMS over the occipital cortex. This suggests that Broca's area is a premotor region essential to finger movement imitation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02530.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TMS studies have demonstrated that stimulation of classical mirror areas can disrupt both intentional and automatic imitation of simple finger and hand actions.

    “TMS studies have demonstrated that stimulation of classical mirror areas can disrupt both intentional and automatic imitation of simple finger and hand actions”

    From Mirror neurons: from origin to function (2014) · cites this paper as Heiser, Iacoboni, Maeda, Marcus, & Mazziotta, 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heiser, M., Iacoboni, M., Maeda, F., Marcus, J., & Mazziotta, J. C.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Iacoboni, Marco
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-03
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
1123-1128
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W2043329972
Cited by
362
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 25
FWCI
28.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (RR08655, RR12169, C06RR012169)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
Broca's area, imitation, Brodmann area 44, pars opercularis, inferior frontal gyrus, action observation, motor execution, inner speech, finger movement, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, occipital cortex
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Electric Stimulation, Fingers, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetics, Male, Psychomotor Performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review