Cited by 41Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationErgonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatment

Studies comparing surrogate measures for head posture in individuals with and without neck pain

Silva, Anabela G., Sharples, Paul, Johnson, Mark I.·2010·Physical Therapy Reviews

Abstract

Background: Head posture (HP) assessment of patients with neck pain (NP) is claimed to be useful in aiding diagnosis, determining treatment strategies and monitoring patient progress. It is assumed that patients with NP have poorer HP than asymptomatic individuals. Objectives: To determine whether there are differences in angles or linear distances between anatomical landmarks used as surrogates for HP between individuals with and without NP. Methods: Studies were sought from PubMed, CINAHL, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Sports Discus, Web of Science, Academic Search Premier and The Cochrane Library. Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts, and assessed full reports for potentially eligible studies. Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers independently extracted information on participants' characteristics, study methods and study quality. Discrepancies were resolved using a third reviewer as arbiter. Study heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis so a tally of study outcome was performed. Results: Seven of 13 included studies found no statistically significant differences in measurements of components of HP between participants with NP and asymptomatic participants. When compared to asymptomatic individuals NP patients were found to have greater forward HP in 4 of 19 comparisons (11 studies), greater head extension/flexion in two of nine comparisons (six studies) and less side-flexion and less rotation in one of one comparison (one study). Conclusion: There is insufficient good quality evidence to determine whether forward HP, head extension, side-flexion and rotation differ between participants with NP and asymptomatic participants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/174328810x12647087218631

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silva, A. G., Sharples, P., & Johnson, M. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Aveiro (PT)
  • Leeds Beckett University (GB)
Venue
Physical Therapy Reviews
Published
2010-02
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
12-22
ISSN
  • 1083-3196 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-288X
OpenAlex
W2035291104
Cited by
41
References
61
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Therapy Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Leeds
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
head posture, neck pain, forward head posture, head extension, head flexion, head rotation, anatomical landmarks, asymptomatic individuals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review