Cited by 342Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersScoliosis diagnosis and treatmentShoulder Injury and Treatment

Head and shoulder posture variations in 160 asymptomatic women and men

Raine, Sally, Twomey, Lance T.·1997·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective To quantitatively describe the postural alignment of the head and shoulders and the surface curvature of the thoracic spine in comfortable erect standing and to examine the effect of age and gender on head and shoulder alignment. Design Descriptive survey. Setting Gait research laboratory. Participants One hundred sixty asymptomatic volunteers aged between 17 and 83 years. Main outcome measures Five photographic measurements of head and shoulder posture in the coronal and sagittal planes and a photographic measurement of the surface curvature of the thoracic spine in the sagittal plane. Results Mean values of coronal head tilt, coronal shoulder angle, sagittal head tilt, sagittal C7-tragus angle, and sagittal shoulder-C7 angle were 180.1 degrees, 181 degrees, 172.1 degrees, 131.1 degrees, and 53.7 degrees, respectively. The 95% confidence intervals for the means ranged between 1 degree and 3.8 degrees. For each of the head and shoulder measurements there was no significant gender difference (p = .33 to .99). Of the five measurements, only sagittal C7-tragus angle was significantly correlated with age (r = .44), and none was correlated with surface curvature of the thoracic spine. Conclusions Head and shoulder posture was similar between genders. Only one postural description that has been described anecdotally was identified, i.e., that age was related to the position of the head with respect to the trunk in the sagittal plane, although the strength of the association was of questionable clinical significance. In contrast, other longstanding assumptions were not supported, and accordingly, a forward head was not associated with increased thoracic curvature or upper cervical spine extension.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90335-x

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raine, S., & Twomey, L. T.
Affiliations
Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Raine, Sally
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-11
Volume
78
Issue
11
Pages
1215-1223
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013638655
Cited by
342
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Keywords
head posture, shoulder posture, postural alignment, age effects, gender differences, forward head posture, asymptomatic adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Female, Head, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Middle Aged, Photography, Posture, Reference Values, Sex Characteristics, Shoulder, Surface Properties, Thoracic Vertebrae, Reproducibility of Results, Confidence Intervals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review