Cited by 21Urban Design and Spatial AnalysisGlobal Urban Networks and DynamicsComplex Network Analysis Techniques

Can visibility predict location? Visibility graph of food and drink facilities in the city

Natapov, A., Czamanski, D., Fisher-Gewirtzman, D.·2013·Survey Review

Abstract

The spatial arrangement of socio-economic facilities in the city is shaped by the interaction of many individuals in the context of a particular physical structure. The urban physical environment displays characteristics of networks (graphs) where nodes and edges are embedded in space. For decades, the analysis of urban network structure represents an attractive model for describing urban phenomena. This paper presents novel means of understanding how socio-economic activities are distributed in urban environment, what forces influence their spatial patterns and how urban structure and functions are mutually dependent. We investigate the functional aspect of urban spatial networks; specifically we study the spatial distribution of food and drink public facilities in the historical district of Tel Aviv-Yafo Israel. These places, cafés, coffee shops, restaurants and others are known as ‘third place’ in urban sociology and play an important role in establishing a sense of place. We propose a novel graph analytic framework in which the third places are incorporated by means of visual accessibility. The development of this framework emerged from the concept of Integrative Visibility Graph (IVG), a quantitative method, based on visibility analysis of urban structure and its functioning. Several centrality measures from complex network theory are applied to the proposed graphs in order to evaluate structural position of third place locations in the urban network. Our findings illustrate a strong correlation between street centrality values and third place distribution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/1752270613y.0000000057

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The integrative visibility graph (IVG) used in this study encodes street network and building uses in one unified framework.

    “Integrative visibility graph (IVG) used in this study encodes street network and building uses in one unified framework (Natapov et al. 2013), (Fig. 2).”

    From A Network Approach to Link Visibility and Urban Activity Location (2018) · cites this paper as Natapov et al. 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Natapov, A., Czamanski, D., & Fisher-Gewirtzman, D.
Affiliations
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
Corresponding author
Natapov, A.
Venue
Survey Review
Published
2013-11
Volume
45
Issue
333
Pages
462-471
ISSN
  • 0039-6265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-2706
OpenAlex
W1971969617
Cited by
21
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Survey Review (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Pennsylvania
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Global Urban Networks and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
visibility graph, third places, urban spatial networks, visual accessibility, network centrality, sense of place

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review