Can visibility predict location? Visibility graph of food and drink facilities in the city
Abstract
The spatial arrangement of socio-economic facilities in the city is shaped by the interaction of many individuals in the context of a particular physical structure. The urban physical environment displays characteristics of networks (graphs) where nodes and edges are embedded in space. For decades, the analysis of urban network structure represents an attractive model for describing urban phenomena. This paper presents novel means of understanding how socio-economic activities are distributed in urban environment, what forces influence their spatial patterns and how urban structure and functions are mutually dependent. We investigate the functional aspect of urban spatial networks; specifically we study the spatial distribution of food and drink public facilities in the historical district of Tel Aviv-Yafo Israel. These places, cafés, coffee shops, restaurants and others are known as ‘third place’ in urban sociology and play an important role in establishing a sense of place. We propose a novel graph analytic framework in which the third places are incorporated by means of visual accessibility. The development of this framework emerged from the concept of Integrative Visibility Graph (IVG), a quantitative method, based on visibility analysis of urban structure and its functioning. Several centrality measures from complex network theory are applied to the proposed graphs in order to evaluate structural position of third place locations in the urban network. Our findings illustrate a strong correlation between street centrality values and third place distribution.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The integrative visibility graph (IVG) used in this study encodes street network and building uses in one unified framework.
“Integrative visibility graph (IVG) used in this study encodes street network and building uses in one unified framework (Natapov et al. 2013), (Fig. 2).”
From A Network Approach to Link Visibility and Urban Activity Location (2018) · cites this paper as Natapov et al. 2013
Cites
From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space
Turner, A., Doxa, M., O'Sullivan, D., & Penn, A. (2001) · Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design · doi:10.1068/b2684 · Cited by 969 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Turner [39] and Turner and Penn [40] applied a visibility graph to the analysis of architectural space taking a grid of all existing points across the space rather than selecting a few key locations (Fig.”
BackgroundElementary processes governing the evolution of road networks
Strano, E., Nicosia, V., Latora, V., Porta, S., & Barthélemy, M. (2012) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00296 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Urban planning and design with points of interest and visual perception
Natapov, A., Cohen, A., & Dalyot, S. (2024) · Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science · doi:10.1177/23998083231191338 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“The current visibility algorithm, adapted for working on the QGIS platform, is based on Natapov et al., (2013), who introduced the initial idea of POI-related visibility graphs using MathWorks, MATLAB, and on Jiang and Claramunt (2002) who proposed similar graph-based schematisation of street…”
MethodSelf-citationA Network Approach to Link Visibility and Urban Activity Location
Natapov, A., Czamanski, D., & Fisher-Gewirtzman, D. (2018) · Networks and Spatial Economics · doi:10.1007/s11067-018-9411-4 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationPOI VizNet: New QGIS Tool to construct Visibility Networks in Cities
Natapov, A., Dalyot, S., & Cohen, A. (2024) · ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences · doi:10.5194/isprs-annals-x-4-2024-239-2024 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Natapov, A., Czamanski, D., & Fisher-Gewirtzman, D.
- Affiliations
- Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Natapov, A.
- Venue
- Survey Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 333
- Pages
- 462-471
- ISSN
- 0039-6265 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-2706
- OpenAlex
- W1971969617
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 2.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Survey Review (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Pennsylvania
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Global Urban Networks and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Keywords
- visibility graph, third places, urban spatial networks, visual accessibility, network centrality, sense of place
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review