Cited by 10

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bluefish Cave II (Yukon Territory, Canada): Taphonomic Study of a Bone Assemblage

Bourgeon, Lauriane·2015·PaleoAmerica

Abstract

The faunal material of Bluefish Cave II (Yukon Territory, Canada), estimated up to 25,000 14C yr BP, is described here through a zooarchaeological and systematic taphonomic analysis to resolve issues about cultural activities at the site and the first entry of humans from Siberia into Alaska/Yukon. While most of the remains appear to be the result of non-human activity, a small component of the assemblage may be human modified.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/2055556314z.0000000001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Behrensmeyer A. K., 1978, Paleobiology, 4, 150, 10.1017/S0094837300005820 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Binford L. R., 1981, Bones. Ancient Men and Modern Myths
  3. Brain C. K., 1981, The Hunters or the Hunted? An Introduction to African Cave Taphonomy
  4. Bunn H. T., 1983, Animals and Archaeology: 1. Hunters and Their Prey, 143
  5. Burke A., 1998, Arctic, 51, 105, 10.14430/arctic1052 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Capaldo S. D., 1994, American Antiquity, 59, 724, 10.2307/282345 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cinq-Mars J., 1979, Canadian Journal of Archaeology, 3, 1
  8. Cinq-Mars J., 1990, Revistade Arqueología Americana, 1, 9
  9. D'Errico F., 1997, Journal of Human Evolution, 33, 1, 10.1006/jhev.1997.0141 · DOI
  10. Fisher J. W., 1995, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 2, 7, 10.1007/BF02228434 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Fosse P., 1996, Paléo, 8, 47, 10.3406/pal.1996.906 · DOI
  12. Goebel T., 2008, Science, 319, 1497, 10.1126/science.1153569 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Guadelli J. L., 2008, Annales de Paléontologie, 94, 121, 10.1016/j.annpal.2008.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Guthrie R. D., 1990, Frozen Fauna of the Mammoth Steppe: The Story of Blue Babe, 10.7208/chicago/9780226159713.001.0001 · DOI
  15. Harington C. R., 2008, Beringian Research Notes, 19, 1
  16. Haynes G., 1980, Paleobiology, 6, 341, 10.1017/S0094837300006849 · DOI
  17. Hoffecker J. F., 2003, Evolutionary Anthropology, 12, 34, 10.1002/evan.10103 · DOI
  18. López-González F., 2006, Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 707, 10.1016/j.jas.2005.10.006 · DOI
  19. Lyman R. L., 1994, Vertebrate Taphonomy, 10.1017/CBO9781139878302 · DOI
  20. Morlan R. E., 1980, Taphonomy and Archaeology in the Upper Pleistocene of the Northern Yukon Territory: A Glimpse of the Peopling of the New World, 10.2307/j.ctv16tq6 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Morlan R. E., 1989, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 26, 149, 10.1139/e89-012 · DOI
  22. Olsen S. L., 1988, Journal of Archaeological Science, 15, 535, 10.1016/0305-4403(88)90081-7 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Outram A. K., 2001, Journal of Archaeological Science, 28, 401, 10.1006/jasc.2000.0619 · DOI
  24. Ritchie J. C., 1982, Paleoecology of Beringia, 113, 10.1016/B978-0-12-355860-2.50014-4 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bourgeon, L.
Venue
PaleoAmerica
Published
2015-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
105-108
ISSN
  • 2055-5563
  • 2055-5571
Cited by
10
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review