The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systematic Review of the Job-stress Intervention Evaluation Literature, 1990–2005
Abstract
Ninety reports of systematic evaluations of job-stress interventions were rated in terms of the degree of systems approach used. A high rating was defined as both organizationally and individually focused, versus moderate (organizational only), and low (individual only). Studies using high-rated approaches represent a growing proportion of the job-stress intervention evaluation literature. Individual-focused, low-rated approaches are effective at the individual level, favorably affecting individual-level outcomes, but tend not to have favorable impacts at the organizational level. Organizationally-focused high- and moderate-rated approaches are beneficial at both individual and organizational levels. Further measures are needed to foster the dissemination and implementation of systems approaches to examining interventions for job stress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The benefits of interventions for work-related stress
(2001) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.91.2.270 · Cited by 999
Reducing work related psychological ill health and sickness absence: a systematic literature review
Michie, S., & Williams, S. (2003) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.60.1.3 · Cited by 816
Mediators of change in emotion-focused and problem-focused worksite stress management interventions
Bond, F. W., & Bunce, D. (2000) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.156 · Cited by 607
van Dierendonck, D., Schaufeli, W. B., & Buunk, B. P. (1998) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.392 · Cited by 260
The changing organization of work and the safety and health of working people: a commentary
Landsbergis, P. A. (2003) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1097/00043764-200301000-00014 · Cited by 227
Self-citationOccupational stress management programmes: a practical overview of published effect studies
van der Hek, H., & Plomp, H. N. (1997) · Occupational Medicine · doi:10.1093/occmed/47.3.133 · Cited by 169
Cited by
Burnout prevention: A review of intervention programs
Awa, W. L., Plaumann, M., & Walter, U. (2010) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.04.008 · Cited by 827
Workplace interventions for common mental disorders: A systematic meta-review
Joyce, S., Modini, M., Christensen, H., Mykletun, A., Bryant, R., Mitchell, P. B., & Harvey, S. B. (2016) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291715002408 · Cited by 525
Byron, K., Khazanchi, S., & Nazarian, D. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017868 · Cited by 491
Preventing occupational stress in healthcare workers
Marine, A., Ruotsalainen, J. H., Serra, C., & Verbeek, J. H. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002892.pub2 · Cited by 499
Bhui, K. S., Dinos, S., Stansfeld, S. A., & White, P. D. (2012) · Journal of Environmental and Public Health · doi:10.1155/2012/515874 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Lamontagne, A. D., Keegel, T., Louie, A. M., Ostry, A., & Landsbergis, P. A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 268-280
- ISSN
- 1077-3525 (ISSN-L)
- 2049-3967
- OpenAlex
- W2146988444
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Systematic Review of the Job-stress Intervention Evaluation Literature, 1990–2005. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1179/oeh.2007.13.3.268
- The paper
- Lamontagne, A. D., Keegel, T., Louie, A. M., Ostry, A., & Landsbergis, P. A. (2007). A Systematic Review of the Job-stress Intervention Evaluation Literature, 1990–2005. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health. https://doi.org/10.1179/oeh.2007.13.3.268
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
