Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 704

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Systematic Review of the Job-stress Intervention Evaluation Literature, 1990–2005

Lamontagne, Anthony D., Keegel, Tessa, Louie, Amber M., Ostry, Aleck, Landsbergis, Paul A.·2007·International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health
DOI 10.1179/oeh.2007.13.3.268
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Ninety reports of systematic evaluations of job-stress interventions were rated in terms of the degree of systems approach used. A high rating was defined as both organizationally and individually focused, versus moderate (organizational only), and low (individual only). Studies using high-rated approaches represent a growing proportion of the job-stress intervention evaluation literature. Individual-focused, low-rated approaches are effective at the individual level, favorably affecting individual-level outcomes, but tend not to have favorable impacts at the organizational level. Organizationally-focused high- and moderate-rated approaches are beneficial at both individual and organizational levels. Further measures are needed to foster the dissemination and implementation of systems approaches to examining interventions for job stress.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/oeh.2007.13.3.268

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lamontagne, A. D., Keegel, T., Louie, A. M., Ostry, A., & Landsbergis, P. A.
Venue
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2007-07
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
268-280
ISSN
  • 1077-3525 (ISSN-L)
  • 2049-3967
DOI
10.1179/oeh.2007.13.3.268
OpenAlex
W2146988444
Cited by
704
References
6
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.