The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In vivo vasculogenic potential of human blood-derived endothelial progenitor cells
Abstract
Vascularization of tissues is a major challenge of tissue engineering (TE). We hypothesize that blood-derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) have the required proliferative and vasculogenic activity to create vascular networks in vivo. To test this, EPCs isolated from human umbilical cord blood or from adult peripheral blood, and human saphenous vein smooth muscle cells (HSVSMCs) as a source of perivascular cells, were combined in Matrigel and implanted subcutaneously into immunodeficient mice. Evaluation of implants at one week revealed an extensive network of human-specific lumenal structures containing erythrocytes, indicating formation of functional anastomoses with the host vasculature. Quantitative analyses showed the microvessel density was significantly superior to that generated by human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HDMECs) but similar to that generated by human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). We also found that as EPCs were expanded in culture, their morphology, growth kinetics, and proliferative responses toward angiogenic factors progressively resembled those of HDMECs, indicating a process of in vitro maturation. This maturation correlated with a decrease in the degree of vascularization in vivo, which could be compensated for by increasing the number of EPCs seeded into the implants. Our findings strongly support the use of human EPCs to form vascular networks in engineered organs and tissues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Isolation of Putative Progenitor Endothelial Cells for Angiogenesis
Asahara, T., Murohara, T., Sullivan, A., Silver, M., van der Zee, R., Li, T., Witzenbichler, B., Schatteman, G., & Isner, J. M. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5302.964 · Cited by 8,725
Cited by
Assessing Identity, Phenotype, and Fate of Endothelial Progenitor Cells
Hirschi, K. K., Ingram, D. A., & Yoder, M. C. (2008) · Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/atvbaha.107.155960 · Cited by 746
Au, P., Daheron, L. M., Duda, D. G., Cohen, K. S., Tyrrell, J. A., Lanning, R. M., Fukumura, D., Scadden, D. T., & Jain, R. K. (2008) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2007-06-094318 · Cited by 342
Fundamentals and application of magnetic particles in cell isolation and enrichment: a review
Plouffe, B. D., Murthy, S. K., & Lewis, L. H. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/1/016601 · Cited by 334
A vascularized and perfused organ-on-a-chip platform for large-scale drug screening applications
Phan, D. T. T., Wang, X., Craver, B. M., Sobrino, A., Zhao, D., Chen, J. C., Lee, L. Y. N., George, S. C., Lee, A. P., & Hughes, C. C. W. (2017) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c6lc01422d · Cited by 325
Shirure, V. S., Bi, Y., Curtis, M. B., Lezia, A., Goedegebuure, M. M., Goedegebuure, S. P., Aft, R., Fields, R. C., & George, S. C. (2018) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c8lc00596f · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Melero-Martin, J. M., Khan, Z. A., Picard, A., Wu, X., Paruchuri, S., & Bischoff, J.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4761-4768
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W1975292043
- Cited by
- 501
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo vasculogenic potential of human blood-derived endothelial progenitor cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2006-12-062471
- The paper
- Melero-Martin, J. M., Khan, Z. A., Picard, A., Wu, X., Paruchuri, S., & Bischoff, J. (2007). In vivo vasculogenic potential of human blood-derived endothelial progenitor cells. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-12-062471
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.