Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 170

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nanoparticle-induced vascular blockade in human prostate cancer

Open access
Agemy, Lilach, Sugahara, Kazuki N., Kotamraju, Venkata Ramana, Gujraty, Kunal, Girard, Olivier M., Kono, Yuko, Mattrey, Robert F., Park, Ji-Ho, Sailor, Michael J., Jimenez, Ana I., Cativiela, Carlos, Zanuy, David, Sayago, Francisco J., Aleman, Carlos, Nussinov, Ruth, Ruoslahti, Erkki·2010·Blood

Abstract

The tumor-homing pentapeptide CREKA (Cys-Arg-Glu-Lys-Ala) specifically homes to tumors by binding to fibrin and fibrin-associated clotted plasma proteins in tumor vessels. Previous results show that CREKA-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide particles can cause additional clotting in tumor vessels, which creates more binding sites for the peptide. We have used this self-amplifying homing system to develop theranostic nanoparticles that simultaneously serve as an imaging agent and inhibit tumor growth by obstructing tumor circulation through blood clotting. The CREKA nanoparticles were combined with nanoparticles coated with another tumor-homing peptide, CRKDKC, and nanoparticles with an elongated shape (nanoworms) were used for improved binding efficacy. The efficacy of the CREKA peptide was then increased by replacing some residues with nonproteinogenic counterparts, which increased the stability of the peptide in the circulation. Treatment of mice bearing orthotopic human prostate cancer tumors with the targeted nanoworms caused extensive clotting in tumor vessels, whereas no clotting was observed in the vessels of normal tissues. Optical and magnetic resonance imaging confirmed tumor-specific targeting of the nanoworms, and ultrasound imaging showed reduced blood flow in tumor vessels. Treatment of mice with prostate cancer with multiple doses of the nanoworms induced tumor necrosis and a highly significant reduction in tumor growth.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2010-03-274258

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 170

Metadata

Authors
Agemy, L., Sugahara, K. N., Kotamraju, V. R., Gujraty, K., Girard, O. M., Kono, Y., Mattrey, R. F., Park, J.-H., Sailor, M. J., Jimenez, A. I., Cativiela, C., Zanuy, D., Sayago, F. J., Aleman, C., Nussinov, R., & Ruoslahti, E.
Venue
Blood
Published
2010-10-14
Volume
116
Issue
15
Pages
2847-2856
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W1999125729
Cited by
170
References
2
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanoparticle-induced vascular blockade in human prostate cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2010-03-274258
The paper
Agemy, L., Sugahara, K. N., Kotamraju, V. R., Gujraty, K., Girard, O. M., Kono, Y., Mattrey, R. F., Park, J.-H., Sailor, M. J., Jimenez, A. I., Cativiela, C., Zanuy, D., Sayago, F. J., Aleman, C., Nussinov, R., & Ruoslahti, E. (2010). Nanoparticle-induced vascular blockade in human prostate cancer. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-03-274258

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.