Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 358

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

F8 gene mutation type and inhibitor development in patients with severe hemophilia A: systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Gouw, Samantha C., van den Berg, H. Marijke, Oldenburg, Johannes, Astermark, Jan, de Groot, Philip G., Margaglione, Maurizio, Thompson, Arthur R., van Heerde, Waander, Boekhorst, Jorien, Miller, Connie H., le Cessie, Saskia, van der Bom, Johanna G.·2012·Blood

Abstract

This systematic review was designed to provide more precise effect estimates of inhibitor development for the various types of F8 gene mutations in patients with severe hemophilia A. The primary outcome was inhibitor development and the secondary outcome was high-titer-inhibitor development. A systematic literature search was performed to include cohort studies published in peer-reviewed journals with data on inhibitor incidences in the various F8 gene mutation types and a mutation detection rate of at least 80%. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) of inhibitor development for different types of F8 gene mutations were calculated with intron 22 inversion as the reference. Data were included from 30 studies on 5383 patients, including 1029 inhibitor patients. The inhibitor risk in large deletions and nonsense mutations was higher than in intron 22 inversions (pooled OR = 3.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.3-5.7 and OR = 1.4, 95% CI, 1.1-1.8, respectively), the risk in intron 1 inversions and splice-site mutations was equal (pooled OR = 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6-1.5 and OR = 1.0; 95% CI, 0.6-1.5), and the risk in small deletions/insertions and missense mutations was lower (pooled OR = 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4-0.6 and OR = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.4, respectively). The relative risks for developing high titer inhibitors were similar.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2011-09-379453

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

See all 358

Metadata

Authors
Gouw, S. C., van den Berg, H. M., Oldenburg, J., Astermark, J., de Groot, P. G., Margaglione, M., Thompson, A. R., van Heerde, W., Boekhorst, J., Miller, C. H., le Cessie, S., & van der Bom, J. G.
Venue
Blood
Published
2012-03-22
Volume
119
Issue
12
Pages
2922-2934
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W1997760245
Cited by
358
References
41
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: F8 gene mutation type and inhibitor development in patients with severe hemophilia A: systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2011-09-379453
The paper
Gouw, S. C., van den Berg, H. M., Oldenburg, J., Astermark, J., de Groot, P. G., Margaglione, M., Thompson, A. R., van Heerde, W., Boekhorst, J., Miller, C. H., le Cessie, S., & van der Bom, J. G. (2012). F8 gene mutation type and inhibitor development in patients with severe hemophilia A: systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-09-379453

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.