Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 488

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antiphospholipid antibodies directed against a combination of phospholipids with prothrombin, protein C, or protein S: an explanation for their pathogenic mechanism? [see comments]

Open access
Oosting, JD, Derksen, RH, Bobbink, IW, Hackeng, TM, Bouma, BN, de Groot, PG·1993·Blood

Abstract

Despite many studies on the pathophysiology of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), the mechanism by which aPL causes thrombosis has not been established. We have tried to elucidate the paradox between the prolongation of the clotting time of phospholipid-dependent coagulation tests in vitro and the occurrence of thrombosis in vivo. The effect on endothelial cell-mediated prothrombinase activity of 30 IgG fractions, of which 22 prolong the aPTT of normal plasma, was investigated. Only 4 of 22 fractions (18%) inhibited prothrombinase activity when tested on this more physiologic phospholipid surface, indicating that in most patients with aPL the prolongation of clotting tests is predominantly as in vitro phenomenon. It was recently reported that in detection methods for aPL, two plasma proteins, beta 2-glycoprotein I and prothrombin, enhance the binding of aPL to phospholipids. We have studied the specificity of the 4 IgG fractions that inhibit the prothrombinase activity and found that they were directed against a combination of phospholipids and prothrombin. However, the involvement of prothrombin in binding of aPL leading to impaired thrombin generation could still result in both a bleeding and a thrombotic tendency. Therefore, we proposed a new thrombogenic mechanism for aPL in which aPL bind to complexes of phospholipids and coagulation proteins, thereby interfering in different coagulation reactions. We tested this new hypothesis by investigating the effect of IgG from the same 30 patients on the activated protein C (APC)-mediated factor Va inactivation in the absence and presence of protein S. Three IgGs that inhibited APC-mediated factor Va inactivation independent of protein S and 4 additional IgGs that inhibited in the presence of protein S were found. Furthermore, we could specifically adsorb the inhibitory IgG with cardiolipin vesicles to which APC with or without protein S was bound. In conclusion, these results suggest that subpopulations of aPL exist that are directed to complexes of phospholipids and different plasma proteins. The identity of the plasma proteins involved in the binding of aPL might determine which pathogenic mechanism causes thrombosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood.v81.10.2618.2618

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 488

Metadata

Authors
Oosting, J., Derksen, R., Bobbink, I., Hackeng, T., Bouma, B., & de Groot, P.
Venue
Blood
Published
1993-05-15
Volume
81
Issue
10
Pages
2618-2625
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W1596313173
Cited by
488
References
33
FWCI
25.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antiphospholipid antibodies directed against a combination of phospholipids with prothrombin, protein C, or protein S: an explanation for their pathogenic mechanism? [see comments]. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v81.10.2618.2618
The paper
Oosting, J., Derksen, R., Bobbink, I., Hackeng, T., Bouma, B., & de Groot, P. (1993). Antiphospholipid antibodies directed against a combination of phospholipids with prothrombin, protein C, or protein S: an explanation for their pathogenic mechanism? [see comments]. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v81.10.2618.2618

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.