The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GATA-1 interacts with the myeloid PU.1 transcription factor and represses PU.1-dependent transcription
Abstract
The GATA-1 transcription factor is capable of suppressing the myeloid gene expression program when ectopically expressed in myeloid cells. We examined the ability of GATA-1 to repress the expression and function of the PU.1 transcription factor, a central regulator of myeloid differentiation. We found that GATA-1 is capable of suppressing the myeloid phenotype without interfering with PU.1 gene expression, but instead was capable of inhibiting the activity of the PU.1 protein in a dose-dependent manner. This inhibition was independent of the ability of GATA-1 to bind DNA, suggesting that it is mediated by protein-protein interaction. We examined the ability of PU.1 to interact with GATA-1 and found a direct interaction between the PU.1 ETS domain and the C-terminal finger region of GATA-1. Replacing the PU.1 ETS domain with the GAL4 DNA-binding domain removed the ability of GATA-1 to inhibit PU.1 activity, indicating that the PU.1 DNA-binding domain, rather than the transactivation domain, is the target for GATA-1–mediated repression. We therefore propose that GATA-1 represses myeloid gene expression, at least in part, through its ability to directly interact with the PU.1 ETS domain and thereby interfere with PU.1 function.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“suggesting that GATA-1 can directly inhibit PU.1 activity (54; see below).”
From Inhibition of CBP-Mediated Protein Acetylation by the Ets Family Oncoprotein PU.1 (2002) · cites this paper as [54]
In the citing paper
“with GATA-1 repressing PU.1 activity during erythropoiesis”
From Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between the Hematopoietic Master Transcription Factors GATA-1 and PU.1 (2006) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“PU.1 repressing GATA-1 function during myelopoiesis”
From Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between the Hematopoietic Master Transcription Factors GATA-1 and PU.1 (2006) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“It has also been shown in several independent studies that the two proteins are able to physically interact both in vitro and in a cellular context.”
From Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between the Hematopoietic Master Transcription Factors GATA-1 and PU.1 (2006) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“Taken together, these data appear to indicate that a direct interaction can take place between GATA-1 and PU.1”
From Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between the Hematopoietic Master Transcription Factors GATA-1 and PU.1 (2006) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“the regions responsible for this interaction are the C-terminal zinc finger of GATA-1 (CF) and the Ets domain of PU.1”
From Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between the Hematopoietic Master Transcription Factors GATA-1 and PU.1 (2006) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“yet the two cysteine mutations failed to disrupt either the interaction with PU.1 or the ability of GATA-1 to inhibit transactivation by PU.1”
From Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between the Hematopoietic Master Transcription Factors GATA-1 and PU.1 (2006) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“this result was surprising at the time, but can be explained by the data obtained in our study, because the CFtail region remained intact and our results indicate that it is this region that makes a major contribution to the binding to PU.1-Ets.”
From Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between the Hematopoietic Master Transcription Factors GATA-1 and PU.1 (2006) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“The evolutionarily conserved DNA binding domain (also known as ETS domain) is confined to the C-terminus of PU.1 and mediates its binding to DNA as well as interaction with a number of other proteins such as c-Jun, GATA-1, GATA-2, C/EBP-α and -β and AML-1[40–42].”
From PU.1 and partners: regulation of haematopoietic stem cell fate in normal and malignant haematopoiesis (2009) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“Several lines of evidence suggest that GATA-1 and PU.1 functionally antagonize each other through direct physical interaction via the DNA-binding domains of both proteins [41, 42, 65].”
From PU.1 and partners: regulation of haematopoietic stem cell fate in normal and malignant haematopoiesis (2009) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“Of interest is that PU.1 and GATA-1 both potentially exhibit autoregulation”
From Potential Autoregulation of Transcription Factor PU.1 by an Upstream Regulatory Element (2005) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“whereas at the same time interactions between these two mediate inhibition of each other's function (38,52,66,67).”
From Potential Autoregulation of Transcription Factor PU.1 by an Upstream Regulatory Element (2005) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“and shown that failure to downregulate PU.1 would result in inhibition of the essential erythroid regulator GATA-1 (38,52,66,67).”
From Potential Autoregulation of Transcription Factor PU.1 by an Upstream Regulatory Element (2005) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“GATA-1 and the ets factor PU.1 have been reported to functionally antagonize one another in the regulation of erythroid versus myeloid gene transcription and development.”
From Novel Combinatorial Interactions of GATA-1, PU.1, and C/EBPε Isoforms Regulate Transcription of the Gene Encoding Eosinophil Granule Major Basic Protein (2002) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“may serve to either up-regulate or down-regulate eosinophil gene transcription through synergistic or antagonistic interactions with GATA-1, dependent upon its expression level relative to GATA-1 (3,12).”
From Novel Combinatorial Interactions of GATA-1, PU.1, and C/EBPε Isoforms Regulate Transcription of the Gene Encoding Eosinophil Granule Major Basic Protein (2002) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“A similar phenomenon is observed with the transcription factor GATA1, which interacts with PU.1 and represses PU.1-dependent transactivation capacity.1,36”
From Granulocyte inducer C/EBPα inactivates the myeloid master regulator PU.1: possible role in lineage commitment decisions (2002) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cites
Single-Step Method of RNA Isolation by Acid Guanidinium Thiocyanate–Phenol–Chloroform Extraction
Chomczynski, P., & Sacchi, N. (1987) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1006/abio.1987.9999 · Cited by 65,515
Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction
Chomczynski, P., & Sacchi, N. (1987) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(87)90021-2 · Cited by 43,843
Requirement of transcription factor PU.1 in the development of multiple hematopoietic lineages
Scott, E. W., Simon, M. C., Anastasi, J., & Singh, H. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8079170 · Cited by 1,532
Functional domains of the human estrogen receptor
Kumar, V., Green, S., Stack, G., Berry, M., Jin, J.-R., & Chambon, P. (1987) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(87)90581-2 · Cited by 1,316
Targeted disruption of the PU.1 gene results in multiple hematopoietic abnormalities
McKercher, S. R., Torbett, B. E., Anderson, K. L., Henkel, G. W., Vestal, D. J., Baribault, H., Klemsz, M., Feeney, A. J., Wu, G. E., Paige, C. J., et al. (1996) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00949.x · Cited by 1,130
Zhang, D.-E., Zhang, P., Wang, N.-D., Hetherington, C. J., Darlington, G. J., & Tenen, D. G. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.2.569 · Cited by 910
Transcription Factors, Normal Myeloid Development, and Leukemia
Tenen, D. G., Hromas, R., Licht, J. D., & Zhang, D.-E. (1997) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v90.2.489 · Cited by 735
Multilineage gene expression precedes commitment in the hemopoietic system.Preprint
Hu, M., Krause, D. S., Greaves, M. F., Sharkis, S. J., Dexter, M., Heyworth, C. M., & Enver, T. (1997) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.11.6.774 · Cited by 719
Tsang, A. P., Visvader, J. E., Turner, C. A., Fujiwara, Y., Yu, C., Weiss, M. J., Crossley, M., & Orkin, S. H. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80318-9 · Cited by 712
Transcription factor GATA-3 is required for development of the T-cell lineage
Ting, C.-N., Olson, M. C., Barton, K., & Leiden, J. M. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/384474a0 · Cited by 607
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 345
Nishiyama, C. (2006) · Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1271/bbb.70.1 · Cited by 26
PU.1 supports proliferation of immature erythroid progenitors
Fisher, R. C., Slayton, W. B., Chien, C. D., Guthrie, S. M., Bray, C. L., & Scott, E. W. (2003) · Leukemia Research · doi:10.1016/s0145-2126(03)00178-4 · Cited by 29
“1 can bind and inhibit GATA-1, a transcription factor that is highly expressed in the erythroid lineage and required for erythroid terminal differentiation [11–14].”
BackgroundWillcockson, M. A., Taylor, S. J., Ghosh, S., Healton, S. E., Wheat, J. C., Wilson, T. J., Steidl, U. G., & Skoultchi, A. I. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1901122116 · Cited by 23
Inhibition of red blood cell development by arsenic-induced disruption of GATA-1
Zhou, X., Medina, S., Bolt, A. M., Zhang, H., Wan, G., Xu, H., Lauer, F. T., Wang, S. C., Burchiel, S. W., & Liu, K. J. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-76118-x · Cited by 28
Differential Cooperation between Regulatory Sequences Required for Human CD53 Gene Expression
Hernández-Torres, J., Yunta, M., & Lazo, P. A. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m104723200 · Cited by 24
RegVelo: Gene-regulatory-informed dynamics of single cells
Wang, W., Hu, Z., Weiler, P., Mayes, S., Lange, M., Fountain, D. M., Haug, J. O., Wang, J., Xue, Z., Sauka‐Spengler, T., et al. (2026) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2026.04.022 · Cited by 33
Soodgupta, D., White, L. S., Yang, W., Johnston, R., Andrews, J. M., Kohyama, M., MURPHY, K. M. M., Mosammaparast, N., Payton, J. E., & Bednarski, J. J. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.026 · Cited by 25
“DNA binding properties or its transcriptional function (Maitra and Atchison, 2000; Nerlov et al., 2000; Rogers et al., 2016).”
BackgroundXing, J. (2022) · Physical Biology · doi:10.1088/1478-3975/ac8c16 · Cited by 24
“Traditionally considerable efforts are needed to acquire such quantitative information even for a pair of genes [65].”
Li, D., Zhao, X., Zhou, S., Hu, Q., Wu, F., & Lee, H. (2023) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad468 · Cited by 24
HDAC inhibitors cause site-specific chromatin remodeling at PU.1-bound enhancers in K562 cells
Frank, C. L., Manandhar, D., Gordân, R., & Crawford, G. E. (2016) · Epigenetics & Chromatin · doi:10.1186/s13072-016-0065-5 · Cited by 27
“1 and GATA1 are capable of inhibiting each other’s function by protein–protein interactions that block DNA binding [33, 34], but it is unclear how that mechanism may be involved in this process.”
BackgroundThe early transcription factor GATA‐2 is expressed in classical Hodgkin's lymphoma
Schneider, E., Torlakovic, E., Stühler, A., Diehl, V., Tesch, H., & Giebel, B. (2004) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.1664 · Cited by 23
Ito, T., Nishiyama, C., Nakano, N., Nishiyama, M., Usui, Y., Takeda, K., Kanada, S., Fukuyama, K., Akiba, H., Tokura, T., et al. (2009) · International Immunology · doi:10.1093/intimm/dxp048 · Cited by 24
Involvement of PU.1 in mast cell/basophil-specific function of the human IL1RL1/ST2 promoter.
Baba, Y., Maeda, K., Yashiro, T., Inage, E., Niyonsaba, F., Hara, M., Suzuki, R., Ohtsuka, Y., Shimizu, T., Ogawa, H., et al. (2012) · Allergology International · doi:10.2332/allergolint.12-oa-0424 · Cited by 22
Post-transcriptional regulation in hematopoiesis: RNA binding proteins take control
de Rooij, L. P. M. H., Chan, D. C. H., Chahi, A. K., & Hope, K. J. (2018) · Biochemistry and Cell Biology · doi:10.1139/bcb-2017-0310 · Cited by 23
“Although a wealth of research has revealed the crucial importance of transcriptional regulation in governing HSC activity (Nerlov et al. 2000; Wilson et al. 2010), HSCs are also subject to”
BackgroundGene expression fluctuations in murine hematopoietic stem cells with cell cycle progression
Dooner, G. J., Colvin, G. A., Dooner, M. S., Johnson, K. W., & Quesenberry, P. J. (2007) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.21273 · Cited by 25
Papetti, M., & Skoultchi, A. I. (2007) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-07-0145 · Cited by 22
“1 and GATA-1 is important in determining the differentiation status of avian multipotential precursor cells (36), and we showed that the stoichiometry of the two factors is important in erythropoiesis in Xenopus embryos (25).”
BackgroundBurda, P., Vargova, J., Čuřík, N., Šálek, C., Papadopoulos, G. L., Strouboulis, J., & Stopka, T. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152234 · Cited by 23
Nakano, N., Nishiyama, C., Yagita∥, H., Koyanagi, A., Ogawa, H., & Okumura, K. (2011) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m110.138966 · Cited by 21
Chui, C. M. Y., Li, K., Yang, M., Chuen, C. K. Y., Fok, T., Li, C.-K., & Yuen, P. (2003) · Cytokine · doi:10.1016/s1043-4666(02)00499-4 · Cited by 22
PU.1 is dispensable to block erythroid differentiation in Friend erythroleukemia cells
Fernández-Nestosa, M. J., Hernández, P., Schvartzman, J. B., & Krimer, D. B. (2007) · Leukemia Research · doi:10.1016/j.leukres.2007.05.008 · Cited by 19
Breig, O., Théoleyre, O., Douablin, A., & Baklouti, F. (2010) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2010.29 · Cited by 19
Decoding early myelopoiesis from dynamics of core endogenous network
Su, H., Wang, G., Yuan, R., Wang, J., Tang, Y., Ao, P., & Zhu, X. (2017) · Science China Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11427-017-9059-y · Cited by 19
Anatomy and physiology of hematopoiesis
Eaves, C. J., & Eaves, A. C. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511471001.005 · Cited by 19
Lineage Commitment and Developmental Plasticity in Early Lymphoid Progenitor Subsets
Traver, D. J., & Akashi, K. (2004) · Advances in immunology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2776(04)83001-3 · Cited by 18
Shoger, K. E., Cheemalavagu, N., Cao, Y., Michalides, B. A., Chaudhri, V. K., Cohen, J. A., Singh, H., & Gottschalk, R. A. (2021) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.abe5137 · Cited by 17
Gross, S. A., Zheng, J. H., Le, A. T., Kerzic, P. J., & Irons, R. (2006) · Cell Biology and Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s10565-006-0128-7 · Cited by 18
“…the major transcription factor responsible for erythroid differentiation, resulting in a combination of the downregulation of the GATA-1 protein and an upregulation in the expression of the PU.1 protein (Nerlov and Graf, 1998; Rekhtman et al., 1999; Zhang et al., 1999, 2000; Nerlov et al., 2000).”
Bonnet, D. A. (2003) · Birth Defects Research Part C Embryo Today Reviews · doi:10.1002/bdrc.10018 · Cited by 17
Baskar, R., Chen, A. F., Favaro, P. M. B., Reynolds, W. D., Müller, F., Borges, L., Jiang, S., Park, H. S., Kool, E. T., Greenleaf, W. J., et al. (2022) · Cell Reports Methods · doi:10.1016/j.crmeth.2022.100188 · Cited by 14
“Our single-cell, high-dimensional proteomic map complements our InTAC-seq assay in revealing trends of relevant surface markers and TFs in GATA-1 high cells within the context of erythroid progenitor development in human BM.”
Harnessing the potential of monocytes/macrophages to regenerate tissue-engineered vascular grafts
Das, A., Smith, R. J., & Andreadis, S. T. (2024) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1093/cvr/cvae106 · Cited by 17
Holmes, T., Yan, F., Ko, K., et al. (2012) · Cell Proliferation · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2184.2012.00813.x · Cited by 15
PU.1 immortalizes hematopoietic progenitors in a GM-CSF-dependent manner
Houston, I. B., Huang, K. J., Jennings, S. R., & DeKoter, R. P. (2007) · Experimental Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.exphem.2006.11.003 · Cited by 15
Nishigaki, K., Hanson, C. A., Ohashi, T., Spadaccini, A., & Ruscetti, S. K. (2006) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.02651-05 · Cited by 16
“A number of reports (33, 45, 63, 64) have shown that PU.”
BackgroundLSD1 inhibition modulates transcription factor networks in myeloid malignancies
Hartung, E. E., Singh, K., & Berg, T. (2023) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1149754 · Cited by 17
“GATA1 regulates the differentiation of HSCs towards the erythroid lineage and erythrocytes (indicated by the green area) (4, 5).”
BackgroundDing, Y., Xu, C., Wang, Z., Zhan, Y., Li, W., Xu, W., Yu, M., Ge, C., Li, C., & Yang, X. (2010) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.22597 · Cited by 14
“The two proteins have been shown to function in an antagonistic fashion, with GATA-1 repressing PU.1 activity during erythropoiesis and PU.1 repressing GATA-1 function during myelopoiesis [Nerlov et al., 2000].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialTranscription Factors in the Development and Pro-Allergic Function of Mast Cells
Srivastava, M., & Kaplan, M. H. (2021) · Frontiers in Allergy · doi:10.3389/falgy.2021.679121 · Cited by 13
Raghav, P. K., & Gangenahalli, G. (2021) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s303235 · Cited by 13
Multiple DNA-binding modes for the ETS family transcription factor PU.1
Esaki, S., Evich, M. G., Erlitzki, N., Germann, M. W., & Poon, G. M. K. (2017) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m117.798207 · Cited by 15
“1 and the zinc finger transcription factor GATA-1, wherein each protein inhibits DNA binding by the other during myelopoiesis (9).”
BackgroundLST1: A multifunctional gene encoded in the MHC class III region
Weidle, U. H., Rohwedder, I., Birzele, F., Weiss, E. H., & Schiller, C. (2018) · Immunobiology · doi:10.1016/j.imbio.2018.07.018 · Cited by 11
Théoleyre, O., Deguillien, M., Morinière, M., Starck, J., Moreau-Gachelin, F., Morlé, F., & Baklouti, F. (2003) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207206 · Cited by 14
Nielsen, J., Doyonnas, R., & McNagny, K. (2002) · Cells Tissues Organs · doi:10.1159/000057691 · Cited by 15
“…Nielsen/Doyonnas/McNagny To better understand this apparent antagonism, the expression of PU.1 was analyzed in E26-transformed myeloid cell lines where GATA-1 was conditionally activated (through the use of an ER-fusion protein and addition of estradiol) [Nerlov et al., 2000, and see above].”
MethodMedina, S., Zhang, H., Santos-Medina, L. V., Wan, G., Bolt, A. M., Zhou, X., Burchiel, S. W., & Liu, K. J. (2022) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2022.116193 · Cited by 12
Ohmori, S., Ishijima, Y., Numata, S., Takahashi, M., Sekita, M., Sato, T., Chugun, K., Yamamoto, M., & Ohneda, K. (2019) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00314-19 · Cited by 15
A review of the role of zinc finger proteins on hematopoiesis
Lima, F. D. S., Gonçalves, C. E. D. S., & Fock, R. A. (2023) · Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtemb.2023.127290 · Cited by 12
Drl.3 governs primitive hematopoiesis in zebrafish
Pimtong, W., Datta, M., Ulrich, A. M., & Rhodes, J. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep05791 · Cited by 10
Uchiumi, F., Enokida, K., Shiraishi, T., Masumi, A., & Tanuma, S.-I. (2010) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2010.04.014 · Cited by 11
Wang, Q., Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Yuan, W., Chen, D., Royer‐Pokora, B., & Zhu, T. (2007) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/sj.leu.2404644 · Cited by 11
Characterization of the Promoter of Human Leukocyte-specific Transcript 1
Yu, X., & Weissman, S. M. (2000) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m004700200 · Cited by 9
Etzrodt, M., & Schroeder, T. (2017) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2017.12.006 · Cited by 9
Regulation of the transcription factor GATA-1 at the gene and protein level
Tang, X., Liu, D.-P., & Liang, C. (2001) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/pl00000833 · Cited by 10
Kwok, J. C., Perdomo, J., & Chong, B. H. (2007) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.21264 · Cited by 9
“The GATA-1 binding activity of mutant K229AþR232AþR235AþK245AþK249A was weaker compared to wildtype (Fig.”
BackgroundInfluentialMas, V. M.-D., de Thonel, A., Gaulin, V., Demur, C., Laurent, G., & Quillet-Mary, A. (2002) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03625.x · Cited by 11
“Indeed, this ETS familymember transcription factor, which is essentially distributed in monocytic and granulocytic lineage (Fisher & Scott, 1998), plays an important function in myeloid lineage commitment (Nerlov & Graf, 1998; Nerlov et al, 2000).”
BackgroundGATA1 and GATA2 Function in Hematopoietic Differentiation
Moriguchi, T., Suzuki, M., Engel, J. D., & Yamamoto, M. P. (2009) · Humana Press eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-347-3_5 · Cited by 9
Handzlik, J. E., & Manu (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009779 · Cited by 11
The regulation of chromatin and DNA-methylation patterns in blood cell development.
Bonifer, C., Lefevre, P., & Tagoh, H. (2006) · Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1007/3-540-31181-5_1 · Cited by 10
“PU.1 functions in opposition to GATA-1, which regulates erythropoiesis and inhibits GATA-1 action (Heyworth et al. 2002; Kulessa et al. 1995; Nerlov et al. 2000; Zhang et al. 2000).”
BackgroundZoueva, O. P., & Rodgers, G. P. (2004) · Experimental Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.exphem.2004.05.024 · Cited by 8
“1 [49–51].”
Zhang, L., Hong, X., Liu, W., Li, Z., Wang, J., Yan, S., & Zha, J. (2025) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2025.109718 · Cited by 7
E2A Antagonizes PU.1 Activity through Inhibition of DNA Binding
Rogers, J. H., Owens, K., Kurkewich, J. L., Klopfenstein, N., Iyer, S. R., Simon, M. C., & Dahl, R. E. (2016) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2016/3983686 · Cited by 7
How Azanucleosides Affect Myeloid Cell Fate
Stein, A., Platzbecker, U., & Cross, M. A. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11162589 · Cited by 7
“One way of doing this would be to combine competing activities into physical complexes that are regulated in a coordinated fashion, as has been reported for lineage specific transcription factors [32,33] and as is described below for a methylation complex [34].”
BackgroundAdult Stem Cel Diferentiation and Trafficking And Their Implications in Disease
Zhuge, Y., Liu, Z., & Velazquez, O. C. (2010) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7037-4_12 · Cited by 7
Interactions négatives entre récepteurs nucléaires et facteurs transcriptionnels
Vlaeminck‐Guillem, V., Laudet, V., & Duterque‐Coquillaud, M. (2003) · médecine/sciences · doi:10.1051/medsci/200319111121 · Cited by 8
Breous, E., Wenzel, A., & Loos, U. (2005) · Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.mce.2005.11.009 · Cited by 6
Yamane, T., Ito, C., Washino, A., Isono, K., & Yamazaki, H. (2016) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.25422 · Cited by 6
“In addition, Pu.1 and Gata1 have been reported to interact directly and antagonize the transcriptional activities of each other (Rekhtman et al., 1999; Nerlov et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 2000).”
BackgroundTheoretical Concepts of Tissue Stem-Cell Organization
Roeder, I., Galle, J., & Loeffler, M. (2006) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.3109/9781420016833-5 · Cited by 6
Germ Layer Induction in ESC—Following the Vertebrate Roadmap
Smith, J., Wardle, F. C., Loose, M., Stanley, E. G., & Patient, R. K. (2007) · Current Protocols in Stem Cell Biology · doi:10.1002/9780470151808.sc01d01s1 · Cited by 6
BRD9 regulates normal human hematopoietic stem cell function and lineage differentiation
Garg, S., Wei Min, N. I., Chowdhury, B., Weisberg, E., Sattler, M., & Griffin, J. D. (2024) · Cell Death and Differentiation · doi:10.1038/s41418-024-01306-5 · Cited by 9
Bifurcation dynamics and determination of alternate cell fates in bipotent progenitor cells
Li, S., Liu, Y., Liu, Z., & Wang, R. (2015) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-014-9318-9 · Cited by 5
Wang, M., Wang, J., Zhang, X., & Yuan, R. (2021) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.211289 · Cited by 3
“The dynamics of these processes suggested different switch-like gene antagonisms; separately, GATA1/PU.1 or GATA1/ IKAROS played a pivotal role in the origin of the MPP differentiation.”
InfluentialOhmori, S., Takai, J., Uemura, S., Otsuki, A., Mori, T., Ohneda, K., & Moriguchi, T. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104942 · Cited by 5
“1 reciprocally inhibit their respective activities via multiple mechanisms (Rekhtman et al., 1999; Zhang et al., 1999, 2000; Nerlov et al., 2000; Arinobu et al., 2007; Burda et al., 2016).”
BackgroundRaczkowski, H. L., & DeKoter, R. P. (2021) · WIREs Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1002/wsbm.1519 · Cited by 4
Transcriptional Regulation of Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Göttgens, B., & Green, A. R. (2004) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012436643-5/50119-x · Cited by 5
Shimokawa, N., Nishiyama, C., Nakano, N., Maeda, K., Suzuki, R., Hara, M., Fukai, T., Tokura, T., Miyajima, H., Nakao, A., et al. (2010) · Immunogenetics · doi:10.1007/s00251-010-0444-1 · Cited by 5
“In several studies, negative crosstalk between PU.1 and GATA-1 in hematopoietic cell development has been reported (Chou et al. 2009; Hong et al. 2002; Nerlov et al. 2000; Rekhtman et al. 1999, 2003; Stopka et al. 2005; Zhang et al. 1999, 2000).”
BackgroundHematologic, hematopoietic, and acute phase responses
Smith, J. W., Gamelli, R. L., & Shankar, R. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4160-3274-8.50027-1 · Cited by 5
Hematologic and hematopoietic response to burn injury
Posluszny, J. A., Gamelli, R. L., & Shankar, R. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4377-2786-9.00023-0 · Cited by 5
Multiple cell populations generate macrophage progenitors in the early yolk sac
Ito, C., Hikosaka‐Kuniishi, M., Yamazaki, H., & Yamane, T. (2022) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-022-04203-7 · Cited by 6
Fitting structure to function in gene regulatory networks
Rothenberg, E. V. (2017) · History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s40656-017-0164-z · Cited by 5
New Insights of Human Parvovirus B19 in Modulating Erythroid Progenitor Cell Differentiation
Feng, S., Zeng, D., Zheng, J., & Zhao, D. (2020) · Viral Immunology · doi:10.1089/vim.2020.0013 · Cited by 4
Transcription Factors That Regulate Macrophage Development and Function
Hume, D., & Himes, S. R. (2003) · Handbook of experimental pharmacology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-55742-2_2 · Cited by 5
Lymphoid Lineage Fate Decision of Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Akashi, K. (2009) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04570.x · Cited by 7
McDevitt, M. A. (2010) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4160-6231-8.10021-2 · Cited by 4
Matsumura, I., Kawasaki, A., Tanaka, H., Sonoyama, J., Ezoe, S., Minegishi, N., Nakajima, K., Yamamoto, M., & Kanakura, Y. (2000) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v96.7.2440.h8002440_2440_2450 · Cited by 35
Herrera-Uribe, J., Lim, K., Byrne, K. A., Daharsh, L., Liu, H., Corbett, R. J., Marco, G., Schroyen, M., Koltes, J. E., Loving, C. L., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2023.1107462 · Cited by 4
Shimokawa, T., Nunomura, S., Enomoto, Y., & Ra, C. (2010) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20091742 · Cited by 3
ES02.01 Transcriptional regulation of haematopoiesis
Göttgens, B. (2004) · Vox Sanguinis · doi:10.1111/j.1741-6892.2004.00423.x · Cited by 3
Harman, C. C. D., Bailis, W., Zhao, J., Hill, L., Qu, R., Jackson, R. P., Shyer, J. A., Steach, H. R., Kluger, Y., Goff, L. A., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1918062118 · Cited by 3
Theoretical Concepts of Tissue Stem-Cell Organization
Roeder, I., Galle, J., & Loeffler, M. (2006) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.3109/9781420016833-3 · Cited by 3
“The present concept to explain the fluctuations observed in lineage specification is based on a dynamic network of interacting transcription factors (31-37).”
BackgroundDNA Sequence-Specific Transcription Factors
Auron, P. E. (2005) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012455900-4/50269-5 · Cited by 2
miRNA-7145-cuedc2 axis controls hematopoiesis through JAK1/STAT3 signaling pathway
Xu, Y., Guo, R., Huang, T., & Guo, C. (2024) · Cell Death Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41420-024-01977-6 · Cited by 3
“These two proteins have a cross-repressive relationship through direct protein interaction [10, 11].”
BackgroundRegulatory Co-options in the Evolution of Deuterostome Immune Systems
Rothenberg, E. V., & Davidson, E. H. (2003) · Humana Press eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-59259-320-0_4 · Cited by 5
Traver, D. J., & Akashi, K. (2004) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012436643-5/50124-3 · Cited by 2
PU.1, a Versatile Transcription Factor and a Suppressor of Myeloid Leukemia
Takahashi, S. (2011) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/25853 · Cited by 3
“Nerlov, C.; Querfurth, E.; Kulessa, H. & Graf, T. (2000) GATA-1 interacts with the myeloid PU.1 transcription factor and represses PU.1-dependent transcription.”
BackgroundmiRNA 146b mediates the regulation of nucleolar size and activity in polyploid megakaryocytes
Chattopadhyaya, S., & Banerjee, S. (2020) · Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1111/boc.202000022 · Cited by 2
“…GATA1, FOG1, Fli1, NF-E2 and GAPDH have been reported to be up-regulated (Shivdasani 2001; Guo et al. 2015), whereas Pu.1, Xist and c-Myb expression has been reported to be down-regulated during megakaryopoiesis (Nerlov et al. 2000; Raslova et al. 2003;Metcalf et al. 2005; Chou et al. 2009).”
BackgroundBatista, C. R., & DeKoter, R. P. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67199-4_101960 · Cited by 2
Multifaced regulator: RNA binding proteins and their roles in hematopoiesis
Ren, Y., Huo, Y., Li, W., Wang, F., & Yu, J. (2019) · Blood Science · doi:10.1097/bs9.0000000000000008 · Cited by 1
Ishii, K., Nagata, K., Yamashita, N., Yamazaki, Y., Akimoto, Y., Zhao, W., Inoue, M., Ito, N., Kasakura, K., & Nishiyama, C. (2025) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.70252 · Cited by 2
Role of GATA Factors in Development
Haenlin, M., & Waltzer, L. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-387-27421-9_30 · Cited by 1
Kunadharaju, R., & Silberstein, P. T. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801238-3.05013-3 · Cited by 1
Spi-B alleviates food allergy by securing mucosal barrier and immune tolerance in the intestine
Ishihara, N., Nakamura, Y., Yakabe, K., Komiyama, S., Fujimura, Y., Kaisho, T., Kimura, S., & Hase, K. (2022) · Frontiers in Allergy · doi:10.3389/falgy.2022.996657 · Cited by 1
Wang, D. (2002) · Chinese Science Bulletin · doi:10.1360/02tb9093 · Cited by 1
Soodgupta, D., White, L. S., Yang, W., et al. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3362390 · Cited by 1
A Novel XACT lncRNA Transcript with Functions Transcending X-Chromosome InactivationPreprint
Zhang, P., Angles, P. H., Zhang, H., Li, T., Mulet‐Lazaro, R., van IJcken, W. F. J., Philipsen, S., Delwel, R., Gribnau, J. H., Huylebroeck, D., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.01.03.631201 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Nerlov, C., Querfurth, E., Kulessa, H., & Graf, T.
- Affiliations
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2000-04-15
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2543-2551
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W1504158565
- Semantic Scholar
- 121bf40998cef29230a3ff789b6f8cdfac638d0d
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 6.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Blood (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Kruppel-like factors research
- Keywords
- GATA-1, PU.1, transcriptional repression, protein-protein interaction, ETS domain, myeloid differentiation, transcription factor interaction, DNA-binding domain
- MeSH terms
- Proto-Oncogene Protein Spi-1, Cell Differentiation, Cell Line, DNA-Binding Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Nuclear Proteins, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Trans-Activators, Gene Transfer Techniques, Leukopoiesis, Erythroid-Specific DNA-Binding Factors, GATA1 Transcription Factor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
