The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GATA-1 interacts with the myeloid PU.1 transcription factor and represses PU.1-dependent transcription
Abstract
The GATA-1 transcription factor is capable of suppressing the myeloid gene expression program when ectopically expressed in myeloid cells. We examined the ability of GATA-1 to repress the expression and function of the PU.1 transcription factor, a central regulator of myeloid differentiation. We found that GATA-1 is capable of suppressing the myeloid phenotype without interfering with PU.1 gene expression, but instead was capable of inhibiting the activity of the PU.1 protein in a dose-dependent manner. This inhibition was independent of the ability of GATA-1 to bind DNA, suggesting that it is mediated by protein-protein interaction. We examined the ability of PU.1 to interact with GATA-1 and found a direct interaction between the PU.1 ETS domain and the C-terminal finger region of GATA-1. Replacing the PU.1 ETS domain with the GAL4 DNA-binding domain removed the ability of GATA-1 to inhibit PU.1 activity, indicating that the PU.1 DNA-binding domain, rather than the transactivation domain, is the target for GATA-1–mediated repression. We therefore propose that GATA-1 represses myeloid gene expression, at least in part, through its ability to directly interact with the PU.1 ETS domain and thereby interfere with PU.1 function.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“suggesting that GATA-1 can directly inhibit PU.1 activity (54; see below).”
From Inhibition of CBP-Mediated Protein Acetylation by the Ets Family Oncoprotein PU.1 (2002) · cites this paper as [54]
In the citing paper
“with GATA-1 repressing PU.1 activity during erythropoiesis”
From Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between the Hematopoietic Master Transcription Factors GATA-1 and PU.1 (2006) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“PU.1 repressing GATA-1 function during myelopoiesis”
From Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between the Hematopoietic Master Transcription Factors GATA-1 and PU.1 (2006) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“It has also been shown in several independent studies that the two proteins are able to physically interact both in vitro and in a cellular context.”
From Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between the Hematopoietic Master Transcription Factors GATA-1 and PU.1 (2006) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“Taken together, these data appear to indicate that a direct interaction can take place between GATA-1 and PU.1”
From Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between the Hematopoietic Master Transcription Factors GATA-1 and PU.1 (2006) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“the regions responsible for this interaction are the C-terminal zinc finger of GATA-1 (CF) and the Ets domain of PU.1”
From Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between the Hematopoietic Master Transcription Factors GATA-1 and PU.1 (2006) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“yet the two cysteine mutations failed to disrupt either the interaction with PU.1 or the ability of GATA-1 to inhibit transactivation by PU.1”
From Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between the Hematopoietic Master Transcription Factors GATA-1 and PU.1 (2006) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“this result was surprising at the time, but can be explained by the data obtained in our study, because the CFtail region remained intact and our results indicate that it is this region that makes a major contribution to the binding to PU.1-Ets.”
From Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between the Hematopoietic Master Transcription Factors GATA-1 and PU.1 (2006) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“The evolutionarily conserved DNA binding domain (also known as ETS domain) is confined to the C-terminus of PU.1 and mediates its binding to DNA as well as interaction with a number of other proteins such as c-Jun, GATA-1, GATA-2, C/EBP-α and -β and AML-1[40–42].”
From PU.1 and partners: regulation of haematopoietic stem cell fate in normal and malignant haematopoiesis (2009) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“Several lines of evidence suggest that GATA-1 and PU.1 functionally antagonize each other through direct physical interaction via the DNA-binding domains of both proteins [41, 42, 65].”
From PU.1 and partners: regulation of haematopoietic stem cell fate in normal and malignant haematopoiesis (2009) · cites this paper as [42]
In the citing paper
“Of interest is that PU.1 and GATA-1 both potentially exhibit autoregulation”
From Potential Autoregulation of Transcription Factor PU.1 by an Upstream Regulatory Element (2005) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“whereas at the same time interactions between these two mediate inhibition of each other's function (38,52,66,67).”
From Potential Autoregulation of Transcription Factor PU.1 by an Upstream Regulatory Element (2005) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“and shown that failure to downregulate PU.1 would result in inhibition of the essential erythroid regulator GATA-1 (38,52,66,67).”
From Potential Autoregulation of Transcription Factor PU.1 by an Upstream Regulatory Element (2005) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“GATA-1 and the ets factor PU.1 have been reported to functionally antagonize one another in the regulation of erythroid versus myeloid gene transcription and development.”
From Novel Combinatorial Interactions of GATA-1, PU.1, and C/EBPε Isoforms Regulate Transcription of the Gene Encoding Eosinophil Granule Major Basic Protein (2002) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“may serve to either up-regulate or down-regulate eosinophil gene transcription through synergistic or antagonistic interactions with GATA-1, dependent upon its expression level relative to GATA-1 (3,12).”
From Novel Combinatorial Interactions of GATA-1, PU.1, and C/EBPε Isoforms Regulate Transcription of the Gene Encoding Eosinophil Granule Major Basic Protein (2002) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“A similar phenomenon is observed with the transcription factor GATA1, which interacts with PU.1 and represses PU.1-dependent transactivation capacity.1,36”
From Granulocyte inducer C/EBPα inactivates the myeloid master regulator PU.1: possible role in lineage commitment decisions (2002) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cites
Single-Step Method of RNA Isolation by Acid Guanidinium Thiocyanate–Phenol–Chloroform Extraction
Chomczynski, P., & Sacchi, N. (1987) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1006/abio.1987.9999 · Cited by 65,515
Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction
Chomczynski, P., & Sacchi, N. (1987) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(87)90021-2 · Cited by 43,843
Requirement of transcription factor PU.1 in the development of multiple hematopoietic lineages
Scott, E. W., Simon, M. C., Anastasi, J., & Singh, H. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8079170 · Cited by 1,532
Functional domains of the human estrogen receptor
Kumar, V., Green, S., Stack, G., Berry, M., Jin, J.-R., & Chambon, P. (1987) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(87)90581-2 · Cited by 1,316
Targeted disruption of the PU.1 gene results in multiple hematopoietic abnormalities
McKercher, S. R., Torbett, B. E., Anderson, K. L., Henkel, G. W., Vestal, D. J., Baribault, H., Klemsz, M., Feeney, A. J., Wu, G. E., Paige, C. J., et al. (1996) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00949.x · Cited by 1,130
Zhang, D.-E., Zhang, P., Wang, N.-D., Hetherington, C. J., Darlington, G. J., & Tenen, D. G. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.2.569 · Cited by 910
Transcription Factors, Normal Myeloid Development, and Leukemia
Tenen, D. G., Hromas, R., Licht, J. D., & Zhang, D.-E. (1997) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v90.2.489 · Cited by 735
Multilineage gene expression precedes commitment in the hemopoietic system.Preprint
Hu, M., Krause, D. S., Greaves, M. F., Sharkis, S. J., Dexter, M., Heyworth, C. M., & Enver, T. (1997) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.11.6.774 · Cited by 719
Tsang, A. P., Visvader, J. E., Turner, C. A., Fujiwara, Y., Yu, C., Weiss, M. J., Crossley, M., & Orkin, S. H. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80318-9 · Cited by 712
Transcription factor GATA-3 is required for development of the T-cell lineage
Ting, C.-N., Olson, M. C., Barton, K., & Leiden, J. M. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/384474a0 · Cited by 607
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 345
Roger, T., Miconnet, I., SCHIESSER, A.-L., Kai, H., Miyake, K., & Calandra, T. (2005) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20041243 · Cited by 79
Chan, W. Y. I., Follows, G., Lacaud, G., Pimanda, J. E., Landry, J., Kinston, S., Knezevic, K., Piltz, S., Donaldson, I. J., Gambardella, L., et al. (2006) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2006-05-023226 · Cited by 84
Gupta, P., Gurudutta, G. U., Saluja, D., & Tripathi, R. P. (2009) · Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00757.x · Cited by 74
“1 functionally antagonize each other through direct physical interaction via the DNA-binding domains of both proteins [41, 42, 65].”
BackgroundThe role of CD71+ erythroid cells in the regulation of the immune response
Grzywa, T. M., Nowis, D., & Gołąb, J. (2021) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107927 · Cited by 81
Matushansky, I., Radparvar, F., & Skoultchi, A. I. (2003) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1206484 · Cited by 76
Kuhl, C., Atzberger, A., Iborra, F. J., Nieswandt, B., Porcher, C., & Vyas, P. (2005) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.25.19.8592-8606.2005 · Cited by 77
“CBP) (3, 6, 9, 33, 37, 44, 71) transcriptional regulators have”
Regulation of Human FcεRI α-Chain Gene Expression by Multiple Transcription Factors
Nishiyama, C., Hasegawa, M., Nishiyama, M., Takahashi, K., Akizawa, Y., Yokota, T., Okumura, K., Ogawa, H., & Ra, C. (2002) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.168.9.4546 · Cited by 75
Psaila, B., & Mead, A. J. (2019) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-11-835371 · Cited by 80
Transcriptional control of B cell development and function
Bartholdy, B., & Matthias, P. (2003) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2003.11.008 · Cited by 78
Inhibition of CBP-Mediated Protein Acetylation by the Ets Family Oncoprotein PU.1
Hong, W., Kim, A. Y., Ky, S., Rakowski, C., Seo, S.-B., Chakravarti, D., Atchison, M., & Blobel, G. A. (2002) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.22.11.3729-3743.2002 · Cited by 74
“1 binds to the erythroid transcription factor GATA-1 and inhibits its activity (40, 54, 63, 83).”
BackgroundThe mechanism of repression of the myeloid-specific c-fms gene by Pax5 during B lineage restriction.
Tagoh, H., Ingram, R., Wilson, N., Salvagiotto, G., Warren, A. J., Clarke, D., Busslinger, M., & Bonifer, C. (2006) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600997 · Cited by 74
“PU.1 functions in opposition to GATA-1, which regulates erythropoieses and inhibits GATA-1 activity (Kulessa et al, 1995; Nerlov et al, 2000; Zhang et al, 2000; Heyworth et al, 2002).”
BackgroundBellantuono, I. (2004) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2003.10.008 · Cited by 77
EVI1 Impairs Myelopoiesis by Deregulation of PU.1 Function
Laricchia‐Robbio, L., Premanand, K., Rinaldi, C. R., & Nucifora, G. (2009) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-2562 · Cited by 75
“Top left, HA-EVI1, HA-EVI1(1-283), and HA-EVI1(159-283) interact with PU.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialJi, M. H., Li, H., Suh, H. C., Klarmann, K. D., Yokota, Y., & Keller, J. R. (2008) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2008-01-133504 · Cited by 74
Hematopoietic Stem Cells: Transcriptional Regulation, Ex Vivo Expansion and Clinical Application
Aggarwal, R., Lu, J., Pompili, V. J., & Das, H. (2011) · Current Molecular Medicine · doi:10.2174/156652412798376125 · Cited by 72
“1, mediated via protein-protein interaction, which in turn suppressed the myeloid gene expression [47].”
BackgroundGATA‐1: Friends, Brothers, and Coworkers
Morceau, F., Schnekenburger, M., Dicato, M. A., & Diederich, M. F. (2004) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1329.064 · Cited by 72
Tremblay, J., Robert, N. M., & Viger, R. S. (2001) · Molecular Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/mend.15.9.0692 · Cited by 71
Control of cancer formation by intrinsic genetic noise and microenvironmental cues
Brock, A., Krause, S., & Ingber, D. E. (2015) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3959 · Cited by 72
Normal and leukaemic stem cells
Bonnet, D. A. (2005) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05596.x · Cited by 67
“Recent studies have reported the direct physical interactions and crossantagonisms of PU.1 and GATA-1 (Rekhtman et al, 1999; Nerlov et al, 2000; Zhang et al, 2000).”
BackgroundThe Hox cofactors Meis1 and Pbx act upstream of gata1 to regulate primitive hematopoiesis
Pillay, L. M., Forrester, A. M., Erickson, T., Berman, J. N., & Waskiewicz, A. J. (2010) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.01.033 · Cited by 66
“1 proteins physically interact to inhibit the transcriptional regulation of each other's target genes (Nerlov et al., 2000; Rekhtman et al., 1999; Stopka et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 1999, 2000).”
BackgroundGarner, H., Martinovic, M., Liu, N. Q., Bakker, N. A. M., Velilla, I. Q., Hau, C., Vrijland, K., Kaldenbach, D., Kok, M., de Wit, E., et al. (2025) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2025.04.007 · Cited by 70
Dissecting Molecular Steps in Chromatin Domain Activation during Hematopoietic Differentiation
Kim, S., Bultman, S. J., Jing, H., Blobel, G. A., & Bresnick, E. H. (2007) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00235-07 · Cited by 63
“1 (52, 62, 83), Sp1 (46), and erythroid Krüppel-like factor (EKLF) (46) and forms diverse multiprotein complexes (29, 63).”
BackgroundHsu, C., Fleischman, A. G., Lai, A. Y., Matsumoto, Y., Weissman, I. L., & Kondo, M. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0510304103 · Cited by 63
Liew, C. W., Rand, K. D., Simpson, R. J. Y., Yung, W. W., Mansfield, R. E., Crossley, M., Proetorius-Ibba, M., Nerlov, C., Poulsen, F. M., & Mackay, J. P. (2006) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m602830200 · Cited by 63
Self-citationHoogenkamp, M., Krysinska, H., Ingram, R., Huang, G., Barlow, R. E. L., Clarke, D., Ebralidze, A. K., Zhang, P., Tagoh, H., Cockerill, P. N., et al. (2007) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00905-07 · Cited by 62
“gene, a crucial regulator of erythropoiesis (26, 29, 43).”
BackgroundFlt3 in Regulation of Type I Interferon‐Producing Cell and Dendritic Cell Development
Onai, N., Obata-Onai, A., Schmid, M., & Manz, M. G. (2007) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1392.015 · Cited by 63
Gosselin, D., & Glass, C. K. (2014) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12213 · Cited by 66
“1 concentration and/or activity level parameter also likely play an important role at other stages of bifurcation as macrophage progenitors develop, including the erythroid-myeloid and the granulopoietic-myelopoietic stages (77, 98, 99).”
Backgroundde Pooter, R. F., Schmitt, T. M., de la Pompa, J. L., Fujiwara, Y., Orkin, S. H., & Zúñiga‐Pflücker, J. C. (2006) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.176.9.5267 · Cited by 63
Ikaros inhibits megakaryopoiesis through functional interaction with GATA-1 and NOTCH signaling
Malinge, S., Thiollier, C., Chlon, T. M., Doré, L. C., Diebold, L. P., Bluteau, O., Mabialah, V., Vainchenker, W., Dessen, P., Winandy, S., et al. (2013) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2012-08-450627 · Cited by 61
Iturri, L., Freyer, L., Biton, A., Dardenne, P., Lallemand, Y., & Perdiguero, E. G. (2020) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2021.04.026 · Cited by 65
DNMT3A and TET2 in the Pre-Leukemic Phase of Hematopoietic Disorders
Sato, H., Wheat, J. C., Steidl, U. G., & Ito, K. (2016) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2016.00187 · Cited by 59
Schwieger, M., Löhler, J., Fischer, M., Herwig, U., Tenen, D. G., & Stocking, C. (2003) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2003-07-2280 · Cited by 56
Transcriptional Control of Macrophage Identity, Self-Renewal, and Function
Molawi, K., & Sieweke, M. H. (2013) · Advances in immunology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417028-5.00010-7 · Cited by 58
“This involves direct interactions of the antagonistic partners and high levels of PU.1 determine myeloid differentiation (Nerlov et al., 2000; Rekhtman et al., 1999; Stopka, Amanatullah, Papetti, & Skoultchi, 2005; Walsh et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 2000).”
BackgroundPick, M., Azzola, L., Osborne, E., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055530 · Cited by 54
“In these fractions, levels of GATA1 were correspondingly lower, consistent with the known mutual inhibition and cross regulation of the two transcription factors [24,25].”
ResultAndrecut, M., Halley, J. D., Winkler, D. A., & Huang, S. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019358 · Cited by 52
“Moreover, the basic architecture of the circuit that involves mutual inhibition and cross-antagonism of the two factors is also widely observed [9,19] – as far as can be inferred from existing data or derived from perturbation experiments, reporter analysis promoters, proteinDNA binding studies and protein-protein int…”
BackgroundInfluentialWontakal, S. N., Guo, X., Will, B., Shi, M., Raha, D., Mahajan, M. C., Weissman, S., Snyder, M., Steidl, U., Zheng, D., et al. (2011) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001392 · Cited by 53
“1 and GATA-1 physically interact and repress each other’s transcriptional activation and lineage specification functions [7–9].”
BackgroundGangenahalli, G. U., Gupta, P., Saluja, D., Verma, Y. K., Kishore, V., Chandra, R., Sharma, R. K., & Ravindranath, T. (2005) · Stem Cells and Development · doi:10.1089/scd.2005.14.140 · Cited by 53
“…transcriptional activity by blocking the binding of the coactivator c-Jun to the (cid:2) 3/ (cid:2) 4 region in the DNA-binding domain of PU.1 (12–14 ,54, 55 ). c-Jun c-Jun, an Similarly, differentiation of Myb-Ets-transformed multipotent progenitors (MEPs) into myeloid cells and eosinophils…”
Matsumura, I., Kawasaki, A., Tanaka, H., Sonoyama, J., Ezoe, S., Minegishi, N., Nakajima, K., Yamamoto, M., & Kanakura, Y. (2000) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v96.7.2440 · Cited by 53
GATA Transcription Factors in Hematologic Disease
Cantor, A. B. (2005) · International Journal of Hematology · doi:10.1532/ijh97.04180 · Cited by 51
“These groups have shown that PU.1 and GATA-1 physically interact and in doing so functionally crossantagonize one another [ 41-43 ].”
BackgroundGATA-1 associates with and inhibits p53
Trainor, C. D., Mas, C., Archambault, P., Di Lello, P., & Omichinski, J. G. (2009) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2008-10-180489 · Cited by 51
Verger, A., Buisine, E., Carrère‐Kremer, S., Wintjens, R. T., Flourens, A., Coll, J., Stéhelin, D., & Duterque‐Coquillaud, M. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m010208200 · Cited by 50
Wittwer, J., Marti-Jaun, J., & Hersberger, M. (2005) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.20273 · Cited by 50
“, 1999], the transcription factors GATA-1 and GATA-2 [Nerlov et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 1999], and the transcription factor NFEM5/Pip [Escalante et al.”
BackgroundMethodLazare, S., Wojtowicz, E. E., Bystrykh, L. V., & de Haan, G. (2014) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.08.033 · Cited by 50
The 25th Volume: Role of the GATA Family of Transcription Factors in Andrology
Viger, R. S., Taniguchi, H., Robert, N. M., & Tremblay, J. (2004) · Journal of Andrology · doi:10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb02813.x · Cited by 49
PU.1-c-Jun interaction is crucial for PU.1 function in myeloid development
Zhao, X., Bartholdy, B., Yamamoto, Y., Evans, E. K., Alberich-Jordà, M., Staber, P. B., Benoukraf, T., Zhang, P., Zhang, J., Trinh, B. Q., et al. (2022) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-022-03888-7 · Cited by 46
GATA-1 mediates auto-regulation of Gfi-1B transcription in K562 cells
Huang, D.-Y. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki838 · Cited by 49
“Among them, Pu.1 and Ski repress GATA-1-mediated trans-activation by inhibiting its DNA-binding activity through their physical interaction ( 36 ,39).”
BackgroundTranscriptional mechanisms regulating myeloid-specific genes
Skalnik, D. G. (2002) · Gene · doi:10.1016/s0378-1119(02)00387-6 · Cited by 48
Chalandon, Y., Jiang, X., Hazlewood, G. S., Loutet, S. A., Conneally, E., Eaves, A. C., & Eaves, C. J. (2002) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v99.9.3197 · Cited by 48
“24/96 (25) 41/96 (43) 8/17 (47) 12/16 (75)”
Role of Transcription Factors in Differentiation and Reprogramming of Hematopoietic Cells
Nakajima, H. (2011) · The Keio Journal of Medicine · doi:10.2302/kjm.60.47 · Cited by 50
Hannah, R., Joshi, A., Wilson, N. K., Kinston, S., & Göttgens, B. (2011) · Experimental Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.exphem.2011.02.009 · Cited by 47
“activities [32–36].”
GATA1 mutations in red cell disorders
Ling, T., & Crispino, J. D. (2019) · IUBMB Life · doi:10.1002/iub.2177 · Cited by 47
Teitell, M. A., & Mikkola, H. K. A. (2006) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1203/01.pdr.0000205155.26315.c7 · Cited by 48
“Each commitment step requires the activation of lineage-specific genes, while unnecessary and conflicting genes are concomitantly repressed (10).”
BackgroundHamdorf, M., Berger, A., Schüle, S., Reinhardt, J., & Flory, E. (2011) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.564 · Cited by 46
Zhou, D., Pawlik, K. M., Ren, J., Sun, C., & Townes, T. M. (2006) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m601182200 · Cited by 47
Recent advances in understanding the molecular pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndromes
Kulasekararaj, A. G., Mohamedali, A. M., & Mufti, G. J. (2013) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/bjh.12435 · Cited by 47
Curik, N., Burda, P., Vargová, K., Pospíšil, V., Beličková, M., Vlckova, P., Savvulidi, F. G., Nečas, E., Hajkova, H., Haškovec, C., et al. (2012) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/leu.2012.47 · Cited by 47
Physical and Functional Interactions between STAT5 and Runx Transcription Factors
Ogawa, S., Satake, M., & Ikuta, K. (2008) · The Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1093/jb/mvn022 · Cited by 43
The role and regulation of friend of GATA-1 (FOG-1) during blood development in the zebrafish
Amigo, J. D., Ackermann, G. E., Cope, J. J., Yu, M., Cooney, J. D., Ma, D.-D., Langer, N. B., Shafizadeh, E., Shaw, G., Horsely, W., et al. (2009) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2008-12-189910 · Cited by 45
Su, Z., Si, W., Li, L., et al. (2014) · The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2014.01.005 · Cited by 44
Competition and collaboration: GATA-3, PU.1, and Notch signaling in early T-cell fate determination
Rothenberg, E. V., & Scripture-Adams, D. D. (2008) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2008.07.006 · Cited by 43
“Liew CW, Rand KD, Simpson RJ, Yung WW, Mansfield RE, Crossley M, et al. Molecular analysis of the interaction between the hematopoietic master transcription factors GATA-1 and PU.1.”
BackgroundInfluentialBastie, J.-N., Balitrand, N., Guidez, F., Guillemot, I., Larghero, J., Calabresse, C., Chomienne, C., & Delva, L. (2004) · Molecular Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/me.2003-0412 · Cited by 44
PU.1 Suppresses Th2 Cytokine Expression via Silencing of GATA3 Transcription in Dendritic Cells
Yashiro, T., Kubo, M., Ogawa, H., Okumura, K., & Nishiyama, C. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137699 · Cited by 43
Johnson, K. D., Conn, D. J., Shishkova, E., Katsumura, K. R., Liu, P., Shen, S., Ranheim, E. A., Kraus, S. G., Wang, W., Calvo, K. R., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20191526 · Cited by 41
“1, thereby blocking myelopoiesis (Nerlov et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 2000); however, whether this occurs in single cells is unclear (Hoppe et al.”
BackgroundTranscriptional regulation of hemopoiesis
Barreda, D. R., & Belosevic, M. (2001) · Developmental & Comparative Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0145-305x(01)00035-0 · Cited by 40
Elements of Transcription Factor Network Design for T-Lineage Specification
Rothenberg, E. V., & Anderson, M. K. (2002) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1006/dbio.2002.0667 · Cited by 40
Miyawaki, K., Arinobu, Y., Iwasaki, H., Kohno, K., Tsuzuki, H., Iino, T., Shima, T., Kikushige, Y., Takenaka, K., Miyamoto, T., et al. (2014) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.1906 · Cited by 39
Transcription factor‐mediated reprogramming toward hematopoietic stem cells
Ebina, W., & Rossi, D. J. (2015) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201490804 · Cited by 41
“Physical interaction between Gata1 and Pu.1 leads to mutual extinction of transcriptional activity (Nerlov et al , 2000; Zhang et al , 2000).”
GATA-1 directly regulates p21 gene expression during erythroid differentiation
Papetti, M., Wontakal, S. N., Stopka, T., & Skoultchi, A. I. (2010) · Cell Cycle · doi:10.4161/cc.9.10.11602 · Cited by 44
Reversal of tumorigenicity and the block to differentiation in erythroleukemia cells by GATA-1.
Choe, K. S., Radparvar, F., Matushansky, I., Rekhtman, N., Han, X., & Skoultchi, A. I. (2003) · PubMed · Cited by 39
Non‐genetic heterogeneity, altered cell fate and differentiation therapy
Lewis, A. C., & Kats, L. M. (2021) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.202012670 · Cited by 36
Therapeutic targeting of the inflammasome in myeloid malignancies
Chakraborty, S., Shapiro, L. C., de Oliveira, S., Rivera-Peña, B., Verma, A. K., & Shastri, A. (2021) · Blood Cancer Journal · doi:10.1038/s41408-021-00547-8 · Cited by 40
Lineage development of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells
Giebel, B., & Punzel, M. (2008) · Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1515/bc.2008.092 · Cited by 43
“Additionally, PU.1 can inhibit the expression of Gata factor encoding genes (Nerlov and Graf, 1998; Rekhtman et al., 1999; Zhang et al., 1999, 2000; Nerlov et al., 2000; Walsh et al., 2002).”
Hematopoiesis and T‐cell specification as a model developmental system
Rothenberg, E. V., Kueh, H. Y., Yui, M. A., & Zhang, J. A. (2016) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12417 · Cited by 36
Choe, K. S., Ujhelly, O., Wontakal, S. N., & Skoultchi, A. I. (2009) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m109.077727 · Cited by 38
Ezoe, S., Matsumura, I., Gale, K. B., Satoh, Y., Ishikawa, J., Mizuki, M., Takahashi, S., Minegishi, N., Nakajima, K., Yamamoto, M. P., et al. (2005) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m413461200 · Cited by 37
GATA2 regulates differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells
Kamata, M., Okitsu, Y., Fujiwara, T., Kanehira, M., Nakajima, S., Takahashi, T., Inoue, A., Fukuhara, N., Onishi, Y., Ishizawa, K., et al. (2014) · Haematologica · doi:10.3324/haematol.2014.105692 · Cited by 37
Reciprocal role of GATA-1 and vitamin D receptor in human myeloid dendritic cell differentiation
Göbel, F., Taschner‐Mandl, S., Jurkin, J., Konradi, S., Vaculik, C., Richter, S., Kneidinger, D., Mühlbacher, C., Bieglmayer, C., Elbe‐Bürger, A., et al. (2009) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2009-03-210484 · Cited by 37
Inage, E., Kasakura, K., Yashiro, T., Suzuki, R., Baba, Y., Nakano, N., Hara, M., Tanabe, A., Oboki, K., Matsumoto, K., et al. (2014) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1302366 · Cited by 34
Rosenbauer, F., Wagner, K., Zhang, P., Knobeloch, K., Iwama, A., & Tenen, D. G. (2004) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2003-08-2688 · Cited by 35
Gene expression during terminal erythroid differentiation
Ney, P. A. (2006) · Current Opinion in Hematology · doi:10.1097/01.moh.0000231415.18333.2c · Cited by 35
Transcriptional Regulation of CD1D1 by Ets Family Transcription Factors
Geng, Y., Laslo, P., Barton, K., & Wang, C.-R. (2005) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.175.2.1022 · Cited by 34
PU.1 inhibits GATA-1 function and erythroid differentiation by blocking GATA-1 DNA binding
Zhang, P., Zhang, X., Iwama, A., et al. (2000) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v96.8.2641.h8002641_2641_2648 · Cited by 34
T-lineage specification and commitment: a gene regulation perspective
Rothenberg, E. V. (2002) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/s1044532302000787 · Cited by 34
Knapp, D. J. H. F., Hammond, C. A., Wang, F., Aghaeepour, N., Miller, P. H., Beer, P. A., Pellacani, D., VanInsberghe, M. A., Hansen, C. L., Bendall, S. C., et al. (2019) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-10-878025 · Cited by 30
Hypergraph factorization for multi-tissue gene expression imputation
Viñas, R., Joshi, C. K., Georgiev, D., Lin, P., Dumitrascu, B., Gamazon, E. R., & Lió, P. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00684-8 · Cited by 36
“For example, GATA1 and SPI1, which were simultaneously enriched in 7 factors (FDR 0.05), functionally antagonize each other through physical interaction 45 .”
BackgroundInfluentialMulti-stage Friend murine erythroleukemia: molecular insights into oncogenic cooperation
Moreau-Gachelin, F. (2008) · Retrovirology · doi:10.1186/1742-4690-5-99 · Cited by 34
“1 and GATA-1 functions through direct interaction [98-101].”
BackgroundSugiyama, D., Tanaka, M., Kitajima, K., Zheng, J., Yen, H., Murotani, T., Yamatodani, A., & Nakano, T. (2007) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2007-08-104489 · Cited by 33
Huang, S. (2006) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012088786-6/50033-2 · Cited by 31
“Coli the existence of allor-none transitions between cell states with respect to lactose metabolism, and that such states can be maintained across generations in the absence of the chemical inducer and genomic mutation (Novick and Weiner, 1957).”
BackgroundThe multi-faceted role of Gata3 in developmental haematopoiesis
Zaidan, N. M., & Ottersbach, K. (2018) · Open Biology · doi:10.1098/rsob.180152 · Cited by 31
“Gata1 downregulates cofactors that are necessary for granulocyte–monocyte and lymphoid development, including Spi1 (PU.1), Il7 and Pax5 [30,31], while promoting megakaryocyte and erythrocyte commitment.”
Genua, C. D., Valletta, S., Buono, M., Stoilova, B., Sweeney, C., Rodríguez-Meira, A., Grover, A., Drissen, R., Meng, Y., Beveridge, R. D. D., et al. (2020) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.022 · Cited by 34
Self-citationBelele, C. L., English, M. A., Chahal, J., Burnetti, A., Finckbeiner, S., Gibney, G., Kirby, M., Sood, R. B., & Liu, P. P. (2009) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2009-05-224709 · Cited by 32
FIP1L1-PDGFRα Imposes Eosinophil Lineage Commitment on Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells
Fukushima, K., Matsumura, I., Ezoe, S., Tokunaga, M., Yasumi, M., Satoh, Y., Shibayama, H., Tanaka, H., Iwama, A., & Kanakura, Y. (2009) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m807489200 · Cited by 27
Burda, P., Čuřík, N., Kokavec, J., Bašová, P., Mikulenková, D., Skoultchi, A. I., Zavadil, J., & Stopka, T. (2009) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-09-0031 · Cited by 30
“1 activation as well as its repression by GATA-1 in reporter assays (21).”
BackgroundDelva, L., Gallais, I., Guillouf, C., Denis, N., Orvain, C., & Moreau-Gachelin, F. (2004) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207578 · Cited by 26
“However, the deleted region in Dcter Spi-1 is known to mediate interaction with various regulators including c-Jun, AML1, C/EBPa and GATA (Petrovick et al., 1998; Behre et al., 1999; Nerlov et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 2000).”
BackgroundRepressive interactions in gene regulatory networks: When you have no other choice
Delàs, M. J., & Briscoe, J. (2020) · Current topics in developmental biology/Current Topics in Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/bs.ctdb.2020.03.003 · Cited by 25
The Hemangioblast: From Concept to Authentication
Cao, N., & Yao, Z. (2011) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.21360 · Cited by 27
Bonifer, C., & Bowen, D. (2010) · Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1017/s1462399410001377 · Cited by 26
The progress and promise of zebrafish as a model to study mast cells
Prykhozhij, S. V., & Berman, J. N. (2014) · Developmental & Comparative Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.dci.2014.01.023 · Cited by 26
“The current model of transcription factor regulation of mast cell differentiation involves sequential and combinatorial transcription regulation by Gata2/3, Notch, Gata1, PU.1, Mitf and C/EBPa.”
BackgroundInfluentialJuban, G., Giraud, G., Guyot, B., Belin, S., Diaz, J., Starck, J., Guillouf, C., Moreau-Gachelin, F., & Morlé, F. (2009) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.01435-08 · Cited by 33
“inhibition of GATA-1 transcriptional activity (39, 45, 46, 67).”
BackgroundNishiyama, C., Nishiyama, M., Ito, T., Masaki, S., Maeda, K., Masuoka, N., Yamane, H., Kitamura, T., Ogawa, H., & Okumura, K. (2003) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.11.145 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Nerlov, C., Querfurth, E., Kulessa, H., & Graf, T.
- Affiliations
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2000-04-15
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2543-2551
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W1504158565
- Semantic Scholar
- 121bf40998cef29230a3ff789b6f8cdfac638d0d
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 6.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Blood (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Kruppel-like factors research
- Keywords
- GATA-1, PU.1, transcriptional repression, protein-protein interaction, ETS domain, myeloid differentiation, transcription factor interaction, DNA-binding domain
- MeSH terms
- Proto-Oncogene Protein Spi-1, Cell Differentiation, Cell Line, DNA-Binding Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Nuclear Proteins, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Trans-Activators, Gene Transfer Techniques, Leukopoiesis, Erythroid-Specific DNA-Binding Factors, GATA1 Transcription Factor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
