The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validity and repeatability of the IUATLD (1984) Bronchial Symptoms Questionnaire: an international comparison
Open accessAbstract
The International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (IUATLD) Bronchial Symptoms Questionnaire (1984) was developed for use in studies of asthma and its reliability measured in an earlier survey in England. The association of the symptoms elicited by this questionnaire to bronchial response to histamine has also been described. This paper presents the results of studies of the questionnaire in four clinical centres in Europe. The reliability of the questionnaire and its ability to predict the bronchial response to histamine were compared for English, Finnish, French and German translations of the questionnaire in samples of diagnosed asthmatics and controls in Nottingham, Berlin, Helsinki and Paris. The answers to questions showed good repeatability, especially in Finland and Germany, particularly those questions on asthma and wheeze. The most sensitive symptom for predicting hyperresponsiveness was the question on wheeze, the most specific questions were those on waking at night with shortness of breath (Paris and Nottingham) and morning tightness (Helsinki and Berlin). This study shows that the IUATLD (1984) questionnaire may provide useful, valid and comparable data even in translation but these studies will need to be repeated in representative samples before such a possibility is accepted as fully demonstrated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rapid method for measurement of bronchial responsiveness.
Yan, K., Salome, C., & Woolcock, A. J. (1983) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.38.10.760 · Cited by 758
Cited by
International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC): rationale and methods
Asher, M., Keil, U., Anderson, H., Beasley, R., Crane, J., Martinez, F., Mitchell, E., Pearce, N., Sibbald, B., Stewart, A., et al. (1995) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.95.08030483 · Cited by 3,724
(1996) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.96.09040687 · Cited by 1,002
JENKINS, M. A., CLARKE, J. R., CARLIN, J. B., ROBERTSON, C. F., HOPPER, J. L., DALTON, M. F., HOLST, D. P., CHOI, K., & GILES, G. G. (1996) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/25.3.609 · Cited by 446
Obesity is a risk for asthma and wheeze but not airway hyperresponsiveness
Schachter, L. M. (2001) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thorax.56.1.4 · Cited by 431
Wieslander, G., Norbäck, D., Björnsson, E., Janson, C., & Boman, G. (1996) · International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health · doi:10.1007/s004200050125 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Burney, P., Laitinen, L., Perdrizet, S., Huckauf, H., Tattersfield, A., Chinn, S., Poisson, N., Heeren, A., Britton, & Jones, T.
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 1989-11-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 940-945
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W2148315379
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validity and repeatability of the IUATLD (1984) Bronchial Symptoms Questionnaire: an international comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.93.02090940
- The paper
- Burney, P., Laitinen, L., Perdrizet, S., Huckauf, H., Tattersfield, A., Chinn, S., Poisson, N., Heeren, A., Britton, & Jones, T. (1989). Validity and repeatability of the IUATLD (1984) Bronchial Symptoms Questionnaire: an international comparison. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.93.02090940
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.