Cited by 446Asthma and respiratory diseasesOccupational exposure and asthmaChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Validation of questionnaire and bronchial hyperresponsiveness against respiratory physician assessment in the diagnosis of asthma

JENKINS, MARK A, CLARKE, JANE R, CARLIN, JOHN B, ROBERTSON, COLIN F, HOPPER, JOHN L, DALTON, MARITA F, HOLST, DIANE P, CHOI, KEVIN +1 more·1996·International Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Tasmanian Asthma survey (TAS) and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) have used questionnaires to measure the prevalence of asthma in adults and children. We have investigated the validity of these questionnaires by comparing response to questionnaire with a physician assessment of asthma status in the past 12 months. METHODS: Ninety-three adults were given the TAS questionnaire to complete and 361 children were given the ISAAC questionnaire. Ninety-one adults and 168 children completed bronchial challenge with hypertonic saline. A consultation with a respiratory physician blinded to the results of the questionnaire and bronchial challenge was given to all subjects. RESULTS: In both adults and children, questionnaires showed high agreement with respiratory physician diagnosis with respect to asthma symptoms in the past 12 months. For the TAS questionnaire the positive and negative predictive values (95% confidence limits) for physician diagnosis for adults were 0.89 (0.68-0.98) and 0.94 (0. 86-0.98) respectively. The instrument was also sensitive 0.80 (0. 58-0.93) and highly specific 0.97 (0.90-0.99). For the ISAAC questionnaire the positive and negative predictive vales for physician diagnosis of asthma in children were 0.61 (0.50-0.71) and 0.94 (0.88-0.98) respectively. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.85 (0.73-0.93) and 0.81 (0.76-0.86) respectively. Compared to the physician diagnosis, the sensitivity of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) for asthma was low for adults 0.39 (0.21-0. 61) and children 0.54 (0.48-0.67) as were the positive predictive values: 0.55 (0.31-0.79) for adults and 0.64 (0.449-0.77) for children. A definition of asthma requiring both a positive questionnaire response and BHR was highly specific but not sensitive for adults 0.37 (0.20-0.59) or children 0.47 (0.35-0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Both the TAS and ISAAC questionnaires are valid instruments for the determination of asthma symptoms in the past 12 months.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ije/25.3.609

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current asthma defined by wheezy breathing in the last 12 months in the absence of a cold is a more sensitive definition than using doctor-diagnosed asthma.

    “For example, current asthma defined by “wheezy breathing in the last 12 months in the absence of a cold” is a more sensitive definition than using “doctor-diagnosed asthma” as they do not rely on the individual to seek health advice (18)”

    From Epidemiology of Asthma in Children and Adults (2019) · cites this paper as [18]

  • Doctor-diagnosed asthma is a more specific definition than wheezy breathing.

    “while the latter is a more specific definition.”

    From Epidemiology of Asthma in Children and Adults (2019) · cites this paper as [18]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
JENKINS, M. A., CLARKE, J. R., CARLIN, J. B., ROBERTSON, C. F., HOPPER, J. L., DALTON, M. F., HOLST, D. P., CHOI, K., & GILES, G. G.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
Venue
International Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1996
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
609-616
ISSN
  • 0300-5771 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3685
OpenAlex
W2110293081
Cited by
446
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 25
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
asthma diagnosis, questionnaire validity, ISAAC questionnaire, airway hyperresponsiveness, hypertonic saline challenge, physician diagnosis, diagnostic accuracy, asthma prevalence, children, adults, asthma definition, sensitivity and specificity, predictive value, asthma symptoms, Tasmania, Australia
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Asthma, Australia, Clinical Competence, Female, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Bronchial Hyperreactivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review