Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 788

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A summary of the new GINA strategy: a roadmap to asthma control

Open access
Reddel, Helen K., Bateman, Eric D., Becker, Allan, Boulet, Louis-Philippe, Cruz, Alvaro A., Drazen, Jeffrey M., Haahtela, Tari, Hurd, Suzanne S., Inoue, Hiromasa, de Jongste, Johan C., Lemanske, Robert F., Levy, Mark L., O'Byrne, Paul M., Paggiaro, Pierluigi, Pedersen, Soren E., Pizzichini, Emilio, Soto-Quiroz, Manuel, Szefler, Stanley J., Wong, Gary W.K., FitzGerald, J. Mark·2015·European Respiratory Journal
DOI 10.1183/13993003.00853-2015
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) has regularly published and annually updated a global strategy for asthma management and prevention that has formed the basis for many national guidelines. However, uptake of existing guidelines is poor. A major revision of the GINA report was published in 2014, and updated in 2015, reflecting an evolving understanding of heterogeneous airways disease, a broader evidence base, increasing interest in targeted treatment, and evidence about effective implementation approaches. During development of the report, the clinical utility of recommendations and strategies for their practical implementation were considered in parallel with the scientific evidence. This article provides a summary of key changes in the GINA report, and their rationale. The changes include a revised asthma definition; tools for assessing symptom control and risk factors for adverse outcomes; expanded indications for inhaled corticosteroid therapy; a framework for targeted treatment based on phenotype, modifiable risk factors, patient preference, and practical issues; optimisation of medication effectiveness by addressing inhaler technique and adherence; revised recommendations about written asthma action plans; diagnosis and initial treatment of the asthma−chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome; diagnosis in wheezing pre-school children; and updated strategies for adaptation and implementation of GINA recommendations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/13993003.00853-2015

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 98 references

Cited by

See all 788

Metadata

Authors
Reddel, H. K., Bateman, E. D., Becker, A., Boulet, L.-P., Cruz, A. A., Drazen, J. M., Haahtela, T., Hurd, S. S., Inoue, H., de Jongste, J. C., Lemanske, R. F., Levy, M. L., O'Byrne, P. M., Paggiaro, P., Pedersen, S. E., Pizzichini, E., Soto-Quiroz, M., Szefler, S. J., Wong, G. W. K., & FitzGerald, J. M.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Publisher
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
Published
2015-07-23
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
622-639
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
DOI
10.1183/13993003.00853-2015
OpenAlex
W2140647407
Cited by
788
References
98
FWCI
70.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A summary of the new GINA strategy: a roadmap to asthma control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/13993003.00853-2015
The paper
Reddel, H. K., Bateman, E. D., Becker, A., Boulet, L.-P., Cruz, A. A., Drazen, J. M., Haahtela, T., Hurd, S. S., Inoue, H., de Jongste, J. C., Lemanske, R. F., Levy, M. L., O'Byrne, P. M., Paggiaro, P., Pedersen, S. E., Pizzichini, E., Soto-Quiroz, M., Szefler, S. J., Wong, G. W. K., & FitzGerald, J. M. (2015). A summary of the new GINA strategy: a roadmap to asthma control. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00853-2015

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.