The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EDGAR: A software framework for the comparative analysis of prokaryotic genomes
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The introduction of next generation sequencing approaches has caused a rapid increase in the number of completely sequenced genomes. As one result of this development, it is now feasible to analyze large groups of related genomes in a comparative approach. A main task in comparative genomics is the identification of orthologous genes in different genomes and the classification of genes as core genes or singletons. RESULTS: To support these studies EDGAR - "Efficient Database framework for comparative Genome Analyses using BLAST score Ratios" - was developed. EDGAR is designed to automatically perform genome comparisons in a high throughput approach. Comparative analyses for 582 genomes across 75 genus groups taken from the NCBI genomes database were conducted with the software and the results were integrated into an underlying database. To demonstrate a specific application case, we analyzed ten genomes of the bacterial genus Xanthomonas, for which phylogenetic studies were awkward due to divergent taxonomic systems. The resultant phylogeny EDGAR provided was consistent with outcomes from traditional approaches performed recently and moreover, it was possible to root each strain with unprecedented accuracy. CONCLUSION: EDGAR provides novel analysis features and significantly simplifies the comparative analysis of related genomes. The software supports a quick survey of evolutionary relationships and simplifies the process of obtaining new biological insights into the differential gene content of kindred genomes. Visualization features, like synteny plots or Venn diagrams, are offered to the scientific community through a web-based and therefore platform independent user interface http://edgar.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de, where the precomputed data sets can be browsed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput
Edgar, R. C. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh340 · Cited by 44,662
PHYLIP-Phylogeny inference package (Version 3.2)
Felsenstein, J. (1989) · Cladistics · Cited by 17,682
Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information: update
Wheeler, D. L. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh073 · Cited by 10,641
Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Reconciliation of Approaches to Bacterial Systematics
Wayne, L. G., Moore, W. E. C., Stackebrandt, E., Kandler, O., Colwell, R. R., Krichevsky, M. I., Truper, H. G., Murray, R. G. E., Grimont, P. A. D., Brenner, D. J., et al. (1987) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00207713-37-4-463 · Cited by 7,332
OrthoMCL: Identification of Ortholog Groups for Eukaryotic Genomes
Li, L., Stoeckert, C. J., & Roos, D. S. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1224503 · Cited by 5,707
Talavera, G., & Castresana, J. (2007) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150701472164 · Cited by 5,631
A Genomic Perspective on Protein Families
Tatusov, R. L., Koonin, E. V., & Lipman, D. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5338.631 · Cited by 3,590
Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer
Delcher, A. L., Bratke, K. A., Powers, E. C., & Salzberg, S. L. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009 · Cited by 3,134
PHYLIP ( PHYLogeny Inference Package)
Cummings, M. P. (2004) · Dictionary of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology · doi:10.1002/9780471650126.dob0534.pub2 · Cited by 3,127
Cited by
Wang, Y., Coleman-Derr, D., Chen, G., & Gu, Y. Q. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv487 · Cited by 888
EDGAR 2.0: an enhanced software platform for comparative gene content analyses
Blom, J., Kreis, J., Spänig, S., Juhre, T., Bertelli, C., Ernst, C., & Goesmann, A. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw255 · Cited by 369
Self-citationBogen, C., Al-Dilaimi, A., Albersmeier, A., Wichmann, J., Grundmann, M., Rupp, O., Lauersen, K. J., Blifernez-Klassen, O., Kalinowski, J., Goesmann, A., et al. (2013) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-926 · Cited by 108
Self-citationHeinl, S., Wibberg, D., Eikmeyer, F., Szczepanowski, R., Blom, J., Linke, B., Goesmann, A., Grabherr, R., Schwab, H., Pühler, A., et al. (2012) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.03.007 · Cited by 102
Self-citationArnoux, J. (2026) · Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris-Saclay / PPanGGOLiN · doi:10.70675/eee354d9zf63dz48ebz9444zd1809f8fb74d
Metadata
- Authors
- Blom, J., Albaum, S. P., Doppmeier, D., Pühler, A., Vorhölter, F.-J., Zakrzewski, M., & Goesmann, A.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2009-05-20
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 154-154
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125119899
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 7.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EDGAR: A software framework for the comparative analysis of prokaryotic genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-10-154
- The paper
- Blom, J., Albaum, S. P., Doppmeier, D., Pühler, A., Vorhölter, F.-J., Zakrzewski, M., & Goesmann, A. (2009). EDGAR: A software framework for the comparative analysis of prokaryotic genomes. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-154
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.