Cited by 582Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenomics and Rare Diseases

CNV-seq, a new method to detect copy number variation using high-throughput sequencing

Open access
Xie, Chao, Tammi, Martti T·2009·BMC Bioinformatics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: DNA copy number variation (CNV) has been recognized as an important source of genetic variation. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is commonly used for CNV detection, but the microarray platform has a number of inherent limitations. RESULTS: Here, we describe a method to detect copy number variation using shotgun sequencing, CNV-seq. The method is based on a robust statistical model that describes the complete analysis procedure and allows the computation of essential confidence values for detection of CNV. Our results show that the number of reads, not the length of the reads is the key factor determining the resolution of detection. This favors the next-generation sequencing methods that rapidly produce large amount of short reads. CONCLUSION: Simulation of various sequencing methods with coverage between 0.1x to 8x show overall specificity between 91.7 - 99.9%, and sensitivity between 72.2 - 96.5%. We also show the results for assessment of CNV between two individual human genomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2105-10-80

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinical diagnostic methods currently include FISH, CGH, SNP arrays, deep sequencing and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR).

    “Clinical diagnostic methods currently include fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), comparative genome hybridisation (CGH), single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays, deep sequencing and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) (8–10).”

    From Comparison of microfluidic digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring copy number variation (2012) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Background (page unavailable) says array comparative genomic hybridization is commonly used to detect copy-number variation, and describes sequencing-based methods. It does not establish that these are clinical diagnostic methods or identify FISH, SNP arrays, and real-time qPCR as methods in the claimed list. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xie, C., & Tammi, M. T.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Tammi, Martti T
Venue
BMC Bioinformatics
Published
2009-03-06
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
80-80
ISSN
1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035593347
Cited by
582
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 38
FWCI
18.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National University of Singapore
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
copy number variation, CNV-seq, shotgun sequencing, CNV detection, statistical models, confidence scores, sequencing depth, read length, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Algorithms, DNA, Humans, Genetic Variation, Genome, Human, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Gene Dosage, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review