Cited by 80Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Copy number variation in plasma as a tool for lung cancer prediction using Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) classifier

Open access
Yu, Daping, Liu, Zhidong, Su, Chongyu, Han, Yi, Duan, XinChun, Zhang, Rui, Liu, Xiaoshuang, Yang, Yang +1 more·2020·Thoracic Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The main cause of cancer death is lung cancer (LC) which usually presents at an advanced stage, but its early detection would increase the benefits of treatment. Blood is particularly favored in clinical research given the possibility of using it for relatively noninvasive analyses. Copy number variation (CNV) is a common genetic change in tumor genomes, and many studies have indicated that CNV-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma could be feasible as a biomarker for cancer diagnosis. METHODS: In this study, we determined the possibility of using chromosomal arm-level CNV from cfDNA as a biomarker for lung cancer diagnosis in a small cohort of 40 patients and 41 healthy controls. Arm-level CNV distributions were analyzed based on z score, and the machine-learning algorithm Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) was applied for cancer prediction. RESULTS: The results showed that amplifications tended to emerge on chromosomes 3q, 8q, 12p, and 7q. Deletions were frequently detected on chromosomes 22q, 3p, 5q, 16q, 10q, and 15q. Upon applying a trained XGBoost classifier, specificity and sensitivity of 100% were finally achieved in the test group (12 patients and 13 healthy controls). In addition, five-fold cross-validation proved the stability of the model. Finally, our results suggested that the integration of four arm-level CNVs and the concentration of cfDNA into the trained XGBoost classifier provides a potential method for detecting lung cancer. CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that the integration of four arm-level CNVs and the concentration from of cfDNA integrated withinto the trained XGBoost classifier could become provides a potentially method for detecting lung cancer detection. KEY POINTS: Significant findings of the study: Healthy individuals have different arm-level CNV profiles from cancer patients. Amplifications tend to emerge on chromosome 3q, 8q, 12p, 7q and deletions tend to emerge on chromosome 22q, 3p, 5q, 16q, 10q, 15q. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: CfDNA concentration, arm 10q, 3q, 8q, 3p, and 22q are key features for prediction. Trained XGBoost classifier is a potential method for lung cancer detection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1759-7714.13204

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Incorporating ML techniques into the healthcare system raises serious ethical challenges and complex questions.

    “However, incorporating the ML techniques into the healthcare system also raises serious ethical challenges and complex questions that need to be seriously considered in order to make a robust and well-balanced assessment of possible benefits and expected harms [125].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [19]Lundberg SM, Lee SI. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), 4‐9 December, Long Beach, CA, USA.
  2. [23]Lin C‐F. Application‐grounded evaluation of predictive model explanation methods (Master Thesis). Eindhoven University of Technology, 2018.
  3. [24]Lundberg SM, Lee S‐I. Consistent feature attribution for tree ensembles. arXiv preprint arXiv:170606060. 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, D., Liu, Z., Su, C., Han, Y., Duan, X., Zhang, R., Liu, X., Yang, Y., & Xu, S.
Affiliations
  • Capital Medical University (CN)
  • Ping An (China) (CN)
  • Beijing Gencode Diagnostics Laboratory Beijing China
Corresponding author
Yu, Daping
Venue
Thoracic Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-11-06
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
95-102
ISSN
  • 1759-7706 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-7714
OpenAlex
W2989341121
Cited by
80
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thoracic Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Beijing Jiaotong University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
lung cancer, copy number variation, cell-free DNA, plasma biomarkers, liquid biopsy, XGBoost classifier, cancer prediction, early cancer detection, cfDNA concentration, chromosomal amplification, chromosomal deletion
MeSH terms
Circulating Tumor DNA, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Tumor, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult, DNA Copy Number Variations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review