The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis and prediction of antibacterial peptides
Open accessAbstract
Background: Antibacterial peptides are important components of the innate immune system, used by the host to protect itself from different types of pathogenic bacteria. Over the last few decades, the search for new drugs and drug targets has prompted an interest in these antibacterial peptides. We analyzed 486 antibacterial peptides, obtained from antimicrobial peptide database APD, in order to understand the preference of amino acid residues at specific positions in these peptides. Results: It was observed that certain types of residues are preferred over others in antibacterial peptides, particularly at the N and C terminus. These observations encouraged us to develop a method for predicting antibacterial peptides in proteins from their amino acid sequence. First, the N-terminal residues were used for predicting antibacterial peptides using Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Quantitative Matrices (QM) and Support Vector Machine (SVM), which resulted in an accuracy of 83.63%, 84.78% and 87.85%, respectively. Then, the C-terminal residues were used for developing prediction methods, which resulted in an accuracy of 77.34%, 82.03% and 85.16% using ANN, QM and SVM, respectively. Finally, ANN, QM and SVM models were developed using N and C terminal residues, which achieved an accuracy of 88.17%, 90.37% and 92.11%, respectively. All the models developed in this study were evaluated using five-fold cross validation technique. These models were also tested on an independent or blind dataset. Conclusion: Among antibacterial peptides, there is preference for certain residues at N and C termini, which helps to demarcate them from non-antibacterial peptides. Both the termini play a crucial role in imparting the antibacterial property to these peptides. Among the methods developed, SVM shows the best performance in predicting antibacterial peptides followed by QM and ANN, in that order. AntiBP (Antibacterial peptides) will help in discovering efficacious antibacterial peptides, which we hope will prove to be a boon to combat the dreadful antibiotic resistant bacteria. A user friendly web server has also been developed to help the biological community, which is accessible at http://www.imtech.res.in/raghava/antibp/.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity
Ganz, T. (2003) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri1180 · Cited by 3,066
Anti-microbial peptides: from invertebrates to vertebrates
Bulet, P., Stöcklin, R., & Menin, L. (2004) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0124.x · Cited by 1,107
Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides: Issues for Potential Clinical Use
Bradshaw, J. P. (2003) · BioDrugs · doi:10.2165/00063030-200317040-00002 · Cited by 293
Cited by
APD2: the updated antimicrobial peptide database and its application in peptide design.
Wang, G., Li, X., & Wang, Z. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn823 · Cited by 941
CAMP: a useful resource for research on antimicrobial peptides.
Thomas, S., Karnik, S., Barai, R. S., Jayaraman, V. K., & Idicula-Thomas, S. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp1021 · Cited by 462
Liu, S., Yu, J.-M., Gan, Y.-C., Qiu, X.-Z., Gao, Z.-C., Wang, H., Chen, S.-X., Xiong, Y., Liu, G.-H., Lin, S.-E., et al. (2023) · Military Medical Research · doi:10.1186/s40779-023-00448-w · Cited by 357
The rumen microbiome: an underexplored resource for novel antimicrobial discovery
Oyama, L. B., Girdwood, S. E., Cookson, A. R., Fernandez-Fuentes, N., Privé, F., Vallin, H. E., Wilkinson, T. J., Golyshin, P. N., Golyshina, O. V., Mikut, R., et al. (2017) · npj Biofilms and Microbiomes · doi:10.1038/s41522-017-0042-1 · Cited by 80
Prediction of antimicrobial peptides based on the adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system application
Fernandes, F. C., Rigden, D. J., & Franco, O. L. (2012) · Peptide Science · doi:10.1002/bip.22066 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Lata, S., Sharma, B., & Raghava, G.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2007-07-23
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 263-263
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083416546
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis and prediction of antibacterial peptides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-8-263
- The paper
- Lata, S., Sharma, B., & Raghava, G. (2007). Analysis and prediction of antibacterial peptides. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-263
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.