The DOI matches its Crossref record; 145 of the 145 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inferring cellular networks – a review
Open accessAbstract
In this review we give an overview of computational and statistical methods to reconstruct cellular networks. Although this area of research is vast and fast developing, we show that most currently used methods can be organized by a few key concepts. The first part of the review deals with conditional independence models including Gaussian graphical models and Bayesian networks. The second part discusses probabilistic and graph-based methods for data from experimental interventions and perturbations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating the Dimension of a Model
Schwarz, G. (1978) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 · Cited by 47,033
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Advances in neural information processing systems 7
Cios, K., & Shields, M. (1997) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(97)90018-7 · Cited by 22,059
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 · Cited by 21,230
System Identification: Theory for the User
Lennart Ljung, A. (1987) · Cited by 17,690
(1988) · Cited by 16,582
Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · Cited by 16,184
Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications.
Hastings, W. K. (1970) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · Cited by 15,195
System identification—Theory for the user
Sinha, N. K. (1989) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(89)90019-8 · Cited by 9,184
Cited by
Inferring Regulatory Networks from Expression Data Using Tree-Based Methods
Huynh-Thu, V. A., Irrthum, A., Wehenkel, L., & Geurts, P. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012776 · Cited by 2,131
“These advances have prompted the development of a plethora of models of GRNs and algorithms to reverse-engineer them from expression data [2–5].”
BackgroundGene regulatory network inference: Data integration in dynamic models—A review
Hecker, M., Lambeck, S., Toepfer, S., van Someren, E., & Guthke, R. (2009) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2008.12.004 · Cited by 755
A human functional protein interaction network and its application to cancer data analysis
Wu, G., Feng, X., & Stein, L. (2010) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-5-r53 · Cited by 692
Comparison of co-expression measures: mutual information, correlation, and model based indices
Song, L., Langfelder, P., & Horvath, S. (2012) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-328 · Cited by 460
TIGRESS: Trustful Inference of Gene REgulation using Stability Selection
Haury, A.-C., Mordelet, F., Vera-Licona, P., & Vert, J.-P. (2012) · BMC Systems Biology · doi:10.1186/1752-0509-6-145 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Markowetz, F., & Spang, R.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- S6
- Pages
- S5-S5
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152482800
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 145
- FWCI
- 8.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inferring cellular networks – a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-8-s6-s5
- The paper
- Markowetz, F., & Spang, R. (2007). Inferring cellular networks – a review. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-s6-s5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
