The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structure and evolution of protein interaction networks: a statistical model for link dynamics and gene duplications
Open accessAbstract
Background: The structure of molecular networks derives from dynamical processes on evolutionary time scales. For protein interaction networks, global statistical features of their structure can now be inferred consistently from several large-throughput datasets. Understanding the underlying evolutionary dynamics is crucial for discerning random parts of the network from biologically important properties shaped by natural selection. Results: We present a detailed statistical analysis of the protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae based on several large-throughput datasets. Protein pairs resulting from gene duplications are used as tracers into the evolutionary past of the network. From this analysis, we infer rate estimates for two key evolutionary processes shaping the network: (i) gene duplications and (ii) gain and loss of interactions through mutations in existing proteins, which are referred to as link dynamics. Importantly, the link dynamics is asymmetric, i.e., the evolutionary steps are mutations in just one of the binding parters. The link turnover is shown to be much faster than gene duplications. Both processes are assembled into an empirically grounded, quantitative model for the evolution of protein interaction networks. Conclusions: According to this model, the link dynamics is the dominant evolutionary force shaping the statistical structure of the network, while the slower gene duplication dynamics mainly affects its size. Specifically, the model predicts (i) a broad distribution of the connectivities (i.e., the number of binding partners of a protein) and (ii) correlations between the connectivities of interacting proteins, a specific consequence of the asymmetry of the link dynamics. Both features have been observed in the protein interaction network of S. cerevisiae.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Evolutionary Fate and Consequences of Duplicate Genes
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5494.1151 · Cited by 4,988
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
Principles of protein-protein interactions
Jones, S., & Thornton, J. M. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.1.13 · Cited by 2,684
Cited by
Turning a hobby into a job: How duplicated genes find new functions
Conant, G. C., & Wolfe, K. H. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2482 · Cited by 1,281
Computational approaches for detecting protein complexes from protein interaction networks: a survey
Li, X., Wu, M., Kwoh, C.-K., & Ng, S.-K. (2010) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-s1-s3 · Cited by 349
Alvarez-Buylla, E. R., Benítez, M., Corvera-Poiré, A., Chaos Cador, Á., de Folter, S., Gamboa de Buen, A., Garay-Arroyo, A., García-Ponce, B., Jaimes-Miranda, F., Pérez-Ruiz, R. V., et al. (2010) · The Arabidopsis Book · doi:10.1199/tab.0127 · Cited by 298
Protein-protein interaction networks and biology—what's the connection?
Hakes, L., Pinney, J. W., Robertson, D. L., & Lovell, S. C. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0108-69 · Cited by 200
Networks and Hierarchies: Approaching Complexity in Evolutionary Theory
Tëmkin, I., & Eldredge, N. (2015) · Interdisciplinary Evolution Research · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15045-1_6 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Berg, J., Lässig, M., & Wagner, A.
- Venue
- BMC Evolutionary Biology
- Published
- 2004-11-27
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-51
- ISSN
- 1471-2148 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135021437
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure and evolution of protein interaction networks: a statistical model for link dynamics and gene duplications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2148-4-51
- The paper
- Berg, J., Lässig, M., & Wagner, A. (2004). Structure and evolution of protein interaction networks: a statistical model for link dynamics and gene duplications. BMC Evolutionary Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-4-51
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.