The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identifying structural variation in haploid microbial genomes from short-read resequencing data using breseq
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Mutations that alter chromosomal structure play critical roles in evolution and disease, including in the origin of new lifestyles and pathogenic traits in microbes. Large-scale rearrangements in genomes are often mediated by recombination events involving new or existing copies of mobile genetic elements, recently duplicated genes, or other repetitive sequences. Most current software programs for predicting structural variation from short-read DNA resequencing data are intended primarily for use on human genomes. They typically disregard information in reads mapping to repeat sequences, and significant post-processing and manual examination of their output is often required to rule out false-positive predictions and precisely describe mutational events. RESULTS: We have implemented an algorithm for identifying structural variation from DNA resequencing data as part of the breseq computational pipeline for predicting mutations in haploid microbial genomes. Our method evaluates the support for new sequence junctions present in a clonal sample from split-read alignments to a reference genome, including matches to repeat sequences. Then, it uses a statistical model of read coverage evenness to accept or reject these predictions. Finally, breseq combines predictions of new junctions and deleted chromosomal regions to output biologically relevant descriptions of mutations and their effects on genes. We demonstrate the performance of breseq on simulated Escherichia coli genomes with deletions generating unique breakpoint sequences, new insertions of mobile genetic elements, and deletions mediated by mobile elements. Then, we reanalyze data from an E. coli K-12 mutation accumulation evolution experiment in which structural variation was not previously identified. Transposon insertions and large-scale chromosomal changes detected by breseq account for ~25% of spontaneous mutations in this strain. In all cases, we find that breseq is able to reliably predict structural variation with modest read-depth coverage of the reference genome (>40-fold). CONCLUSIONS: Using breseq to predict structural variation should be useful for studies of microbial epidemiology, experimental evolution, synthetic biology, and genetics when a reference genome for a closely related strain is available. In these cases, breseq can discover mutations that may be responsible for important or unintended changes in genomes that might otherwise go undetected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kim, D., Pertea, G., Trapnell, C., Pimentel, H., Kelley, R., & Salzberg, S. L. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36 · Cited by 12,668
Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration
Thorvaldsdottir, H., Robinson, J. T., & Mesirov, J. P. (2013) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbs017 · Cited by 9,049
Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes
Kurtz, S., Phillippy, A., Delcher, A. L., Smoot, M., Shumway, M., Antonescu, C., & Salzberg, S. L. (2004) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12 · Cited by 5,254
Greaves, M., & Maley, C. C. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10762 · Cited by 3,162
The Molecular Diversity of Adaptive Convergence
Tenaillon, O., Rodríguez-Verdugo, A., Gaut, R. L., McDonald, P., Bennett, A. F., Long, A. D., & Gaut, B. S. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1212986 · Cited by 815
Minty, J. J., Lesnefsky, A. A., Lin, F., Chen, Y., Zaroff, T. A., Veloso, A. B., Xie, B., McConnell, C. A., Ward, R. J., Schwartz, D. R., et al. (2011) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/1475-2859-10-18 · Cited by 185
Cited by
Cameron, D. L., Di Stefano, L., & Papenfuss, A. T. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11146-4 · Cited by 328
Moger-Reischer, R. Z., Glass, J. I., Wise, K. S., Sun, L., Bittencourt, D. M. C., Lehmkuhl, B. K., Schoolmaster, D. R., Lynch, M., & Lennon, J. T. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06288-x · Cited by 116
Deatherage, D. E., Traverse, C. C., Wolf, L. N., & Barrick, J. E. (2015) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2014.00468 · Cited by 93
Self-citationIsenring, J., Geirnaert, A., Lacroix, C., & Stevens, M. J. A. (2021) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s12866-021-02331-x · Cited by 42
Garrigues, S., Peng, M., Kun, R. S., & de Vries, R. P. (2023) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00668-23 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Barrick, J. E., Colburn, G., Deatherage, D. E., Traverse, C. C., Strand, M. D., Borges, J. J., Knoester, D. B., Reba, A., & Meyer, A. G.
- Venue
- BMC Genomics
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1039
- ISSN
- 1471-2164 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085454969
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 5.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying structural variation in haploid microbial genomes from short-read resequencing data using breseq. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2164-15-1039
- The paper
- Barrick, J. E., Colburn, G., Deatherage, D. E., Traverse, C. C., Strand, M. D., Borges, J. J., Knoester, D. B., Reba, A., & Meyer, A. G. (2014). Identifying structural variation in haploid microbial genomes from short-read resequencing data using breseq. BMC Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-1039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.