The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonrandom distribution and frequencies of genomic and EST-derived microsatellite markers in rice, wheat, and barley
Open accessAbstract
Background: Earlier comparative maps between the genomes of rice (Oryza sativa L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were linkage maps based on cDNA-RFLP markers. The low number of polymorphic RFLP markers has limited the development of dense genetic maps in wheat and the number of available anchor points in comparative maps. Higher density comparative maps using PCR-based anchor markers are necessary to better estimate the conservation of colinearity among cereal genomes. The purposes of this study were to characterize the proportion of transcribed DNA sequences containing simple sequence repeats (SSR or microsatellites) by length and motif for wheat, barley and rice and to determine in-silico rice genome locations for primer sets developed for wheat and barley Expressed Sequence Tags. Results: The proportions of SSR types (di-, tri-, tetra-, and penta-nucleotide repeats) and motifs varied with the length of the SSRs within and among the three species, with trinucleotide SSRs being the most frequent. Distributions of genomic microsatellites (gSSRs), EST-derived microsatellites (EST-SSRs), and transcribed regions in the contiguous sequence of rice chromosome 1 were highly correlated. More than 13,000 primer pairs were developed for use by the cereal research community as potential markers in wheat, barley and rice. Conclusion: Trinucleotide SSRs were the most common type in each of the species; however, the relative proportions of SSR types and motifs differed among rice, wheat, and barley. Genomic microsatellites were found to be primarily located in gene-rich regions of the rice genome. Microsatellite markers derived from the use of non-redundant EST-SSRs are an economic and efficient alternative to RFLP for comparative mapping in cereals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primer3 on the WWW for General Users and for Biologist Programmers
Rozen, S., & Skaletsky, H. (2003) · Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols · doi:10.1385/1-59259-192-2:365 · Cited by 15,013
A Greedy Algorithm for Aligning DNA Sequences
Zhang, Z., Schwartz, S., Wagner, L., & Miller, W. (2000) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/10665270050081478 · Cited by 5,478
Thiel, T., Michalek, W., Varshney, R., & Graner, A. (2003) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-002-1031-0 · Cited by 2,535
Temnykh, S., DeClerck, G., Lukashova, A., Lipovich, L., Cartinhour, S., & McCouch, S. (2001) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.184001 · Cited by 1,477
Microsatellites are preferentially associated with nonrepetitive DNA in plant genomes
Morgante, M., Hanafey, M., & Powell, W. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng822 · Cited by 1,161
Comparative genetics in the grasses
Gale, M. D., & Devos, K. M. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.5.1971 · Cited by 945
Kantety, R. V., La Rota, M., Matthews, D. E., & Sorrells, M. E. (2002) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1014875206165 · Cited by 659
Self-citationAnalysis of SSRs derived from grape ESTs
Scott, K. D., Eggler, P., Seaton, G., Rossetto, M., Ablett, E. M., Lee, L. S., & Henry, R. J. (2000) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s001220051344 · Cited by 579
Isolation and mapping of microsatellite markers specific for the D genome of bread wheat
Pestsova, E., Ganal, M. W., & Röder, M. S. (2000) · Genome · doi:10.1139/g00-042 · Cited by 566
The genome sequence and structure of rice chromosome 1
Sasaki, T., Matsumoto, T., Yamamoto, K., Sakata, K., Baba, T., Katayose, Y., Wu, J., Niimura, Y., Cheng, Z., Nagamura, Y., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01184 · Cited by 550
Cited by
Genome analysis of the platypus reveals unique signatures of evolution
paper, A. L. O. A. A. T. A. A. A. T. E. O. T. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06936 · Cited by 719
Repeat or not repeat?—Statistical validation of tandem repeat prediction in genomic sequences
Schaper, E., Kajava, A. V., Hauser, A., & Anisimova, M. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks726 · Cited by 52
Genome-Wide Analysis of Simple Sequence Repeats in Marine Animals—a Comparative Approach
Jiang, Q., Li, Q., Yu, H., & Kong, L. (2014) · Marine Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s10126-014-9580-1 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- La Rota, M., Kantety, R. V., Yu, J.-K., & Sorrells, M. E.
- Venue
- BMC Genomics
- Published
- 2005-02-18
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-23
- ISSN
- 1471-2164 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1960233596
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 23.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonrandom distribution and frequencies of genomic and EST-derived microsatellite markers in rice, wheat, and barley. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2164-6-23
- The paper
- La Rota, M., Kantety, R. V., Yu, J.-K., & Sorrells, M. E. (2005). Nonrandom distribution and frequencies of genomic and EST-derived microsatellite markers in rice, wheat, and barley. BMC Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-6-23
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.