The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Standardization of cytokine flow cytometry assays
Open accessAbstract
Background: Cytokine flow cytometry (CFC) or intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) can quantitate antigen-specific T cell responses in settings such as experimental vaccination. Standardization of ICS among laboratories performing vaccine studies would provide a common platform by which to compare the immunogenicity of different vaccine candidates across multiple international organizations conducting clinical trials. As such, a study was carried out among several laboratories involved in HIV clinical trials, to define the inter-lab precision of ICS using various sample types, and using a common protocol for each experiment (see additional files online). Results: Three sample types (activated, fixed, and frozen whole blood; fresh whole blood; and cryopreserved PBMC) were shipped to various sites, where ICS assays using cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65 peptide mix or control antigens were performed in parallel in 96-well plates. For one experiment, antigens and antibody cocktails were lyophilised into 96-well plates to simplify and standardize the assay setup. Results (CD4+cytokine+ cells and CD8+cytokine+ cells) were determined by each site. Raw data were also sent to a central site for batch analysis with a dynamic gating template. Mean inter-laboratory coefficient of variation (C.V.) ranged from 17–44% depending upon the sample type and analysis method. Cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) yielded lower inter-lab C.V.'s than whole blood. Centralized analysis (using a dynamic gating template) reduced the inter-lab C.V. by 5–20%, depending upon the experiment. The inter-lab C.V. was lowest (18–24%) for samples with a mean of >0.5% IFNγ + T cells, and highest (57–82%) for samples with a mean of <0.1% IFNγ + cells. Conclusion: ICS assays can be performed by multiple laboratories using a common protocol with good inter-laboratory precision, which improves as the frequency of responding cells increases. Cryopreserved PBMC may yield slightly more consistent results than shipped whole blood. Analysis, particularly gating, is a significant source of variability, and can be reduced by centralized analysis and/or use of a standardized dynamic gating template. Use of pre-aliquoted lyophilized reagents for stimulation and staining can provide further standardization to these assays.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effects of cryopreservation on lymphocyte immunophenotype and function
Costantini, A., Mancini, S., Giuliodoro, S., Butini, L., Regnery, C. M., Silvestri, G., & Montroni, M. (2003) · Journal of Immunological Methods · doi:10.1016/s0022-1759(03)00202-3 · Cited by 185
Cited by
Variation in the Human Immune System Is Largely Driven by Non-Heritable Influences
Brodin, P., Jojic, V., Gao, T., Bhattacharya, S., Angel, C. J. L., Furman, D., Shen-Orr, S., Dekker, C. L., Swan, G. E., Butte, A. J., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.12.020 · Cited by 1,065
Self-citationMIFlowCyt: The minimum information about a flow cytometry experiment
Lee, J. A., Spidlen, J., Boyce, K., Cai, J., Crosbie, N., Dalphin, M., Furlong, J., Gasparetto, M., Goldberg, M., Goralczyk, E. M., et al. (2008) · Cytometry Part A · doi:10.1002/cyto.a.20623 · Cited by 533
“of existing FCM data because of poor annotation (2).”
BackgroundGuidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (third edition)
Cossarizza, A., Chang, H., Radbruch, A., Abrignani, S., Addo, R., Akdis, M., Andrä, I., Andreata, F., Annunziato, F., Arranz, E., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.202170126 · Cited by 531
Automated identification of stratifying signatures in cellular subpopulations
Bruggner, R. V., Bodenmiller, B., Dill, D. L., Tibshirani, R. J., & Nolan, G. P. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1408792111 · Cited by 473
Neonatal Innate TLR-Mediated Responses Are Distinct from Those of Adults
Kollmann, T. R., Crabtree, J., Rein-Weston, A., Blimkie, D., Thommai, F., Wang, X. Y., Lavoie, P. M., Furlong, J., Fortuno, E. S., Hajjar, A. M., et al. (2009) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0901481 · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- Maecker, H. T., Rinfret, A., D'Souza, P., Darden, J., Roig, E., Landry, C., Hayes, P., Birungi, J., Anzala, O., Garcia, M., Harari, A., Frank, I., Baydo, R., Baker, M., Holbrook, J., Ottinger, J., Lamoreaux, L., Epling, C. L., Sinclair, E., Suni, M. A., Punt, K., Calarota, S., El-Bahi, S., Alter, G., Maila, H., Kuta, E., Cox, J., Gray, C., Altfeld, M., Nougarede, N., Boyer, J., Tussey, L., Tobery, T., Bredt, B., Roederer, M., Koup, R., Maino, V. C., Weinhold, K., Pantaleo, G., Gilmour, J., Horton, H., & Sekaly, R. P.
- Venue
- BMC Immunology
- Published
- 2005-06-24
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-13
- ISSN
- 1471-2172 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1941148137
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standardization of cytokine flow cytometry assays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2172-6-13
- The paper
- Maecker, H. T., Rinfret, A., D'Souza, P., Darden, J., Roig, E., Landry, C., Hayes, P., Birungi, J., Anzala, O., Garcia, M., Harari, A., Frank, I., Baydo, R., Baker, M., Holbrook, J., Ottinger, J., Lamoreaux, L., Epling, C. L., Sinclair, E., . . . Sekaly, R. P. (2005). Standardization of cytokine flow cytometry assays. BMC Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2172-6-13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.