The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of the bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle using 16S rDNA bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP)
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The microbiota of an animal's intestinal tract plays important roles in the animal's overall health, productivity and well-being. There is still a scarcity of information on the microbial diversity in the gut of livestock species such as cattle. The primary reason for this lack of data relates to the expense of methods needed to generate such data. Here we have utilized a bacterial tag-encoded FLX 16s rDNA amplicon pyrosequencing (bTEFAP) approach that is able to perform diversity analyses of gastrointestinal populations. bTEFAP is relatively inexpensive in terms of both time and labor due to the implementation of a novel tag priming method and an efficient bioinformatics pipeline. We have evaluated the microbiome from the feces of 20 commercial, lactating dairy cows. RESULTS: Ubiquitous bacteria detected from the cattle feces included Clostridium, Bacteroides, Porpyhyromonas, Ruminococcus, Alistipes, Lachnospiraceae, Prevotella, Lachnospira, Enterococcus, Oscillospira, Cytophage, Anaerotruncus, and Acidaminococcus spp. Foodborne pathogenic bacteria were detected in several of the cattle, a total of 4 cows were found to be positive for Salmonella spp (tentative enterica) and 6 cows were positive for Campylobacter spp. (tentative lanienae). CONCLUSION: Using bTEFAP we have examined the microbiota in the feces of cattle. As these methods continue to mature we will better understand the ecology of the major populations of bacteria the lower intestinal tract. This in turn will allow for a better understanding of ways in which the intestinal microbiome contributes to animal health, productivity and wellbeing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Prevotella, Bacteroides, Ruminococcus, Faecalibacterium, Roseburia and Clostridium are consistently identified in fecal samples from ruminants and are considered part of the core microbiota (Dowd et al., 2008; Durso et al., 2012).”
From Addressing global ruminant agricultural challenges through understanding the rumen microbiome: past, present, and future (2018) · cites this paper as Dowd et al., 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669 · cited 2×
“The resulting TC FASTA for each sample was then evaluated using BLASTn [77] against a custom database derived from the RDP-II database [78] and GenBank http://ncbi.”
MethodAn obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest
Turnbaugh, P. J., Ley, R. E., Mahowald, M. A., Magrini, V., Mardis, E. R., & Gordon, J. I. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05414 · Cited by 12,444 · cited 1×
“Results and Discussion Recent research related to host physiology (obesity) and the gastrointestinal bacterial populations have sparked a renewed interest in understanding the gut microbiome [26,27].”
BackgroundHuman gut microbes associated with obesity
Ley, R. E., Turnbaugh, P. J., Klein, S., & Gordon, J. I. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/4441022a · Cited by 8,785 · cited 1×
“Results and Discussion Recent research related to host physiology (obesity) and the gastrointestinal bacterial populations have sparked a renewed interest in understanding the gut microbiome [26,27].”
BackgroundDiversity of the Human Intestinal Microbial Flora
Eckburg, P. B., Bik, E. M., Bernstein, C. N., Purdom, E., Dethlefsen, L., Sargent, M., Gill, S. R., Nelson, K. E., & Relman, D. A. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1110591 · Cited by 7,913 · cited 1×
“Information on microbial diversity within the gastrointestinal tract of humans has increased in recent years as a result of 16S rDNA-based analyses [9,10], yet similar data on the microbiomes of livestock is lacking [11,12].”
BackgroundFood-Related Illness and Death in the United States
Mead, P. S., Slutsker, L., DIETZ, V. J., McCaig, L. F., Bresee, J., Shapiro, C. A., Griffin, P. M., & Tauxe, R. V. (1999) · Emerging infectious diseases · doi:10.3201/eid0505.990502 · Cited by 7,305
CAP3: A DNA Sequence Assembly Program
Huang, X., & Madan, A. (1999) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.9.9.868 · Cited by 5,261 · cited 3×
“The ace files generated by CAP3 were then processed to generate a secondary FASTA file containing the tentative consensus (TC) sequences of the assembly along with the number of reads integrated into each consensus.”
MethodInfluentialEcological and Evolutionary Forces Shaping Microbial Diversity in the Human Intestine
Ley, R. E., Peterson, D. A., & Gordon, J. I. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.017 · Cited by 3,358 · cited 1×
“Information on microbial diversity within the gastrointestinal tract of humans has increased in recent years as a result of 16S rDNA-based analyses [9,10], yet similar data on the microbiomes of livestock is lacking [11,12].”
BackgroundHungate, R. E. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-12555-x · Cited by 3,060
Bacteroides : the Good, the Bad, and the Nitty-Gritty
Wexler, H. M. (2007) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00008-07 · Cited by 2,388
Determination of microbial diversity in environmental samples: pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis
von Wintzingerode, F., Göbel, U. B., & Stackebrandt, E. S. (1997) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00351.x · Cited by 2,085
Bias caused by template annealing in the amplification of mixtures of 16S rRNA genes by PCR
Suzuki, M. T., & Giovannoni, S. (1996) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.62.2.625-630.1996 · Cited by 2,021 · cited 1×
“Although molecular approaches can also introduce their own forms of bias such as the ability to detect both viable and non-viable bacteria [18-20] they currently provide the most powerful tools available for elucidating the diversity of animal microbiomes [4,11,12,15].”
BackgroundThe RDP (Ribosomal Database Project)
Maidak, B. L., Olsen, G. J., Larsen, N. E., Overbeek, R., McCaughey, M. J., & Woese, C. R. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.1.109 · Cited by 2,018
Pyrosequencing enumerates and contrasts soil microbial diversity
Roesch, L. F. W., Fulthorpe, R. R., Riva, A., Casella, G., Hadwin, A. K. M., Kent, A. D., Daroub, S. H., Camargo, F. A. D. O., Farmerie, W. G., & Triplett, E. W. (2007) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2007.53 · Cited by 1,891 · cited 1×
“The use of rapid sequencing technologies combined with molecular methods is becoming a gold standard for evaluating the microbiomes of animals [21-25].”
MethodThe Ruminant Animal: Digestive Physiology and Nutrition
Church, D. C. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,386
Accuracy and quality of massively parallel DNA pyrosequencing
Huse, S. M., Huber, J. A., Morrison, H. G., Sogin, M. L., & Welch, D. B. M. (2007) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-7-r143 · Cited by 1,280 · cited 1×
“The use of rapid sequencing technologies combined with molecular methods is becoming a gold standard for evaluating the microbiomes of animals [21-25].”
MethodThe RDP-II (Ribosomal Database Project)
Maidak, B. L. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.1.173 · Cited by 1,180
Culture-Independent Analysis of Gut Bacteria: the Pig Gastrointestinal Tract Microbiota Revisited
Leser, T. D., Amenuvor, J. Z., Jensen, T. K., Lindecrona, R. H., Boyé, M., & Møller, K. (2002) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.68.2.673-690.2002 · Cited by 868 · cited 1×
“may also be beneficial and improve digestion of complex organic matter such as cellulose and even act as beneficial probiotics [39-43].”
BackgroundWalker, A. W., Duncan, S. H., McWilliam Leitch, E. C., Child, M. W., & Flint, H. J. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.7.3692-3700.2005 · Cited by 796 · cited 1×
“These beneficial health effects relate to the ability of these intestinal bacterial populations to supply vital nutrients, convert metabolites and beneficially interact with host cells [6-8].”
BackgroundDowd, S. E., Sun, Y., Secor, P. R., Rhoads, D. D., Wolcott, B. M., James, G. A., & Wolcott, R. D. (2008) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/1471-2180-8-43 · Cited by 783 · cited 1×
“The use of rapid sequencing technologies combined with molecular methods is becoming a gold standard for evaluating the microbiomes of animals [21-25].”
MethodGastrointestinal Microflora Studies in Late‐Onset Autism
Finegold, S. M., Molitoris, D., Song, Y., Liu, C., Vaisanen, M., Bolte, E., McTeague, M., Sandler, R., Wexler, H., Marlowe, E. M., et al. (2002) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/341914 · Cited by 742 · cited 1×
“Further studies have indicated that, in humans, intestinal microbial populations of clostridia could be responsible for the development of autism [28,29].”
BackgroundFarrelly, V., Rainey, F. A., & Stackebrandt, E. (1995) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.61.7.2798-2801.1995 · Cited by 723 · cited 1×
“Although molecular approaches can also introduce their own forms of bias such as the ability to detect both viable and non-viable bacteria [18-20] they currently provide the most powerful tools available for elucidating the diversity of animal microbiomes [4,11,12,15].”
BackgroundShort pyrosequencing reads suffice for accurate microbial community analysis
Liu, Z., Lozupone, C., Hamady, M., Bushman, F. D., & Knight, R. D. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm541 · Cited by 692 · cited 1×
“The use of rapid sequencing technologies combined with molecular methods is becoming a gold standard for evaluating the microbiomes of animals [21-25].”
MethodFlint, H. J., Duncan, S. H., Scott, K. P., & Louis, P. (2007) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01281.x · Cited by 632 · cited 1×
“These beneficial health effects relate to the ability of these intestinal bacterial populations to supply vital nutrients, convert metabolites and beneficially interact with host cells [6-8].”
BackgroundNaylor, S. W., Low, J. C., Besser, T. E., Mahajan, A., Gunn, G. J., Pearce, M. C., McKendrick, I. J., Smith, D. G., & Gally, D. L. (2003) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.71.3.1505-1512.2003 · Cited by 519 · cited 1×
“coli serotype O157:H7 is commonly associated with the intestinal mucosa of cattle [67].”
BackgroundGenotypic Microbial Community Profiling: A Critical Technical Review
Nocker, A., Burr, M. D., & Camper, A. K. (2007) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s00248-006-9199-5 · Cited by 414 · cited 1×
“Culture-based methods are extremely time-consuming and to date we have only been able to culture approximately 1% of the bacteria in the gut [16].”
Escherichia coliO157:H7 in Feral Swine near Spinach Fields and Cattle, Central California Coast1
Jay, M. T., Cooley, M. B., Carychao, D. K., Wiscomb, G. W., Sweitzer, R. A., Crawford-Miksza, L. K., Farrar, J. A., Lau, D. K., O’Connell, J., Millington, A., et al. (2007) · Emerging infectious diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1312.070763 · Cited by 404 · cited 1×
“Zoonotic pathogenic bacteria, such as Salmonella enterica and E. coli O157:H7 can live in the lower gut of cattle and cause human illnesses through carcass contamination, farm run-off, or crop contamination [ 57-60 ].”
BackgroundExtensive Set of 16S rRNA-Based Probes for Detection of Bacteria in Human Feces
Harmsen, H. J. M., Raangs, G. C., He, T., Degener, J. E., & Welling, G. W. (2002) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.68.6.2982-2990.2002 · Cited by 401 · cited 1×
“(tentative pectinoschiza) is another genus which has been poorly characterized in environments other than the rumen and has only been occasionally detected in the feces of pigs and humans [55,56].”
BackgroundFood-Related Illness and Death in the United States
Hedberg, C. W. (1999) · Emerging infectious diseases · doi:10.3201/eid0506.990624 · Cited by 264 · cited 2×
“4 million illnesses and over 500 deaths attributed to salmonellosis in the United States annually [63].”
BackgroundWise, M. G. G., & Siragusa, G. R. (2006) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03153.x · Cited by 230 · cited 1×
“this bacteria as part of the intestinal community of chickens [ 48 ].”
BackgroundAvguštin, G., WALLACE, R. J., & Flint, H. J. (1997) · International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology · doi:10.1099/00207713-47-2-284 · Cited by 213 · cited 14×
“Results: Ubiquitous bacteria detected from the cattle feces included Clostridium, Bacteroides, Porpyhyromonas, Ruminococcus, Alistipes, Lachnospiraceae, Prevotella, Lachnospira, Enterococcus, Oscillospira, Cytophage, Anaerotruncus, and Acidaminococcus spp. Foodborne pathogenic bacteria were detected in several of the…”
BackgroundInfluentialProbiotics in animal nutrition: A review
Vanbelle, M., Teller, E., & Focant, M. C. (1990) · Archiv für Tierernaehrung · doi:10.1080/17450399009428406 · Cited by 213 · cited 1×
“Such studies have raised a pertinent question: is there a microbiome profile in food animals that can increase production efficiency, product quality, and/or food safety? This question has been obliquely addressed through the use of probiotics, prebiotics and competitive exclusion products which seek to establish a he…”
BackgroundBolte, E. R. (1998) · Medical Hypotheses · doi:10.1016/s0306-9877(98)90107-4 · Cited by 213 · cited 1×
“Further studies have indicated that, in humans, intestinal microbial populations of clostridia could be responsible for the development of autism [28,29].”
BackgroundGastrointestinal microbial ecology and the safety of our food supply as related to Salmonella1,2
Callaway, T. R., Edrington, T. S., Anderson, R. C., Byrd, J. A., & Nisbet, D. J. (2007) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0457 · Cited by 192 · cited 2×
“The majority of these bacteria are vital to the maintenance of animal's health and it is expected that even minor perturbations in these populations may cause dramatic shifts that can affect livestock productivity [3-5].”
BackgroundPryde, S. E., Richardson, A. J., Stewart, C. S., & Flint, H. J. (1999) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.65.12.5372-5377.1999 · Cited by 179 · cited 3×
“A number of studies [11] have also evaluated powerful yet classical sequencing approaches, which involve PCR amplification, cloning and Sanger sequencing.”
BackgroundRautio, M., Eerola, E., Väisänen, M., Molitoris, D. R., Lawson, P. A., Collins, M. D., & Jousimies-Somer, H. R. (2003) · Systematic and Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1078/072320203322346029 · Cited by 168 · cited 13×
“Results: Ubiquitous bacteria detected from the cattle feces included Clostridium, Bacteroides, Porpyhyromonas, Ruminococcus, Alistipes, Lachnospiraceae, Prevotella, Lachnospira, Enterococcus, Oscillospira, Cytophage, Anaerotruncus, and Acidaminococcus spp. Foodborne pathogenic bacteria were detected in several of the…”
BackgroundInfluentialCanibe, N., Højberg, O., Højsgaard, S., & Jensen, B. B. (2005) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/2005.8361287x · Cited by 158 · cited 1×
“The majority of these bacteria are vital to the maintenance of animal's health and it is expected that even minor perturbations in these populations may cause dramatic shifts that can affect livestock productivity [3-5].”
BackgroundPrevalence of Salmonella in Diverse Environmental Farm Samples
Rodríguez, A., Pangloli, P., Richards, H. A., Mount, J. R., & Draughon, F. A. (2006) · Journal of Food Protection · doi:10.4315/0362-028x-69.11.2576 · Cited by 151 · cited 2×
“Consequently beef and dairy products are also well known sources of human Salmonellosis [59,64-66].”
BackgroundMolecular community analysis of microbial diversity
Dahllöf, I. (2002) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0958-1669(02)00314-2 · Cited by 148
Grizard, D., & Barthomeuf, C. (1999) · annales de biologie animale biochimie biophysique · doi:10.1051/rnd:19990505 · Cited by 144 · cited 1×
“These effects are typically specifically associated with the individual Clostridium species involved [ 33 ,34].”
BackgroundThe rumen microbial ecosystem—some recent developments
Flint, H. J. (1997) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(97)01159-1 · Cited by 136 · cited 1×
“Traditionally culture-based methods have been used to identify and enumerate commensal members of the ruminal and intestinal flora [13-15].”
MethodDunkley, K. D., Dunkley, C. S., Njongmeta, N. L. A., Callaway, T. R., Hume, M. E., Kubena, L. F., Nisbet, D. J., & Ricke, S. C. (2007) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/86.5.801 · Cited by 130 · cited 2×
“Such studies have raised a pertinent question: is there a microbiome profile in food animals that can increase production efficiency, product quality, and/or food safety? This question has been obliquely addressed through the use of probiotics, prebiotics and competitive exclusion products which seek to establish a he…”
BackgroundEffect of a partially chemically defined diet on normal human fecal flora
Attebery, H. R., Sutter, V. L., & Finegold, S. M. (1972) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/25.12.1391 · Cited by 130 · cited 1×
“The new method of bTEFAP is not limited to detecting organisms via culture methods, and can be used to define what constitutes a "healthy" or an "unhealthy" microbiome profile by correlating populations of bacterial species with dietary energy and protein utilization, host growth rate and efficiency, host gene express…”
MethodComparison of the Cecal Microbiota of Domestic and Wild Turkeys
Scupham, A. J., Patton, T. G., Bent, E., & Bayles, D. O. (2008) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s00248-007-9349-4 · Cited by 127 · cited 1×
“Other than this original description there are only a handful of reports of Alistipes as a member of the intestinal population, including one study which identified this organism as being isolated from the ceca of turkeys [51].”
BackgroundDetermination of microbial diversity in environmental samples: pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis
von Wintzingerode, F. (1997) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(97)00057-0 · Cited by 123
Dechet, A. M., Scallan, E., Gensheimer, K., Hoekstra, R., Gunderman-King, J., Lockett, J., Wrigley, D., Chege, W., & Sobel, J. (2006) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/500320 · Cited by 122 · cited 1×
“Consequently beef and dairy products are also well known sources of human Salmonellosis [59, 64-66 ].”
BackgroundThe emergence of Clostridium difficile as a pathogen of food animals
Songer, J. G. (2004) · Animal Health Research Reviews · doi:10.1079/ahr200492 · Cited by 117 · cited 1×
“difficile [35-37] and can also cause significant productivity problems including reducing the protein availability in fresh forage diets [38].”
BackgroundMicrobiology of the rumen and intestine
Yokoyama, M., & Johnson, K. A. (1988) · Cited by 104
Effect of Tea Polyphenols on Fecal Flora Metabolic Products of Pigs.
Hiroyoshi, H. A. R. A., ORITA, N., HATANO, S., ICHIKAWA, H., Hara, Y., Matsumoto, N., KIMURA, Y., Terada, A., & MITSUOKA, T. (1995) · Journal of Veterinary Medical Science · doi:10.1292/jvms.57.45 · Cited by 101 · cited 1×
“The new method of bTEFAP is not limited to detecting organisms via culture methods, and can be used to define what constitutes a "healthy" or an "unhealthy" microbiome profile by correlating populations of bacterial species with dietary energy and protein utilization, host growth rate and efficiency, host gene express…”
MethodPerformance and Fecal Flora of Calves Fed a Bacillus subtilis Concentrate
Jenny, B. F., Vandijk, H. J., & Collins, J. A. (1991) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(91)78364-1 · Cited by 96 · cited 1×
“Traditionally culture-based methods have been used to identify and enumerate commensal members of the ruminal and intestinal flora [13-15].”
MethodDetection of Clostridium proteoclasticum and Closely Related Strains in the Rumen by Competitive PCR
Reilly, K., & Attwood, G. T. (1998) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.64.3.907-913.1998 · Cited by 90 · cited 1×
“difficile [35-37] and can also cause significant productivity problems including reducing the protein availability in fresh forage diets [38].”
Backgroundvan der Wielen, P. W. J. J., Lipman, L. J. A., Knapen, F. V., & Biesterveld, S. (2002) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.68.2.555-559.2002 · Cited by 89
Polysaccharide Breakdown by Anaerobic Microorganisms Inhabiting the Mammalian Gut
Flint, H. J. (2004) · Advances in applied microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2164(04)56003-3 · Cited by 86 · cited 1×
“These beneficial health effects relate to the ability of these intestinal bacterial populations to supply vital nutrients, convert metabolites and beneficially interact with host cells [6-8].”
BackgroundLachnospira pectinoschiza sp. nov., an Anaerobic Pectinophile from the Pig Intestine
Cornick, N. A., Jensen, N. S., Stahl, D. A., Hartman, P. A., & Allison, M. J. (1994) · International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology · doi:10.1099/00207713-44-1-87 · Cited by 75
Kanauchi, O., Matsumoto, Y., Matsumura, M., Fukuoka, M., & Bamba, T. (2005) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/1381612053381675 · Cited by 73 · cited 1×
“These effects are typically specifically associated with the individual Clostridium species involved [33,34].”
BackgroundRicke, S. C., & Pillai, S. D. (1999) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.1080/10408419991299176 · Cited by 71 · cited 1×
“Such studies have raised a pertinent question: is there a microbiome profile in food animals that can increase production efficiency, product quality, and/or food safety? This question has been obliquely addressed through the use of probiotics, prebiotics and competitive exclusion products which seek to establish a he…”
BackgroundCulture-Independent Analysis of Fecal Microbiota in Cattle
Ozutsumi, Y., Hayashi, H., Sakamoto, M., ITABASHI, H., & Benno, Y. (2005) · Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1271/bbb.69.1793 · Cited by 68 · cited 1×
“may also be beneficial and improve digestion of complex organic matter such as cellulose and even act as beneficial probiotics [ 39-43 ].”
BackgroundBryant, M. P. (1970) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/23.11.1440 · Cited by 64 · cited 1×
“Investigators such as Robert Hungate and Marvin Bryant characterized some ruminal and intestinal microbial populations, and related the biochemistry of these microorganisms to their roles in animal nutrition [1,71]; however they were limited to the use of culture-based methodologies.”
BackgroundCallaway, T. R., Callaway, T. R., Anderson, R. C., Edrington, T. S., Genovese, K. J., Harvey, R. B., Poole, T. L., & Nisbet, D. J. (2004) · Animal Health Research Reviews · doi:10.1079/ahr200462 · Cited by 64
Production of indolic compounds by rumen bacteria isolated from grazing ruminants
Attwood, G. T., Li, D., Pacheco, D., & Tavendale, M. H. (2006) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02896.x · Cited by 62 · cited 1×
“difficile [35-37] and can also cause significant productivity problems including reducing the protein availability in fresh forage diets [38].”
BackgroundClostridial diseases of small ruminants.
Songer, J. G. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 58
Outbreak of Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella Newport--United States, January-April 2002
(2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.8.951 · Cited by 58
Shoemaker, N. B., Anderson, K. L., Smithson, S. L., Wang, G. R., & Salyers, A. A. (1991) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.57.8.2114-2120.1991 · Cited by 56 · cited 1×
“Bacteroides are also noted to participate in natural genetic transfer of antimicrobial resistance genes [45].”
BackgroundFarthing, M. J. G. (1985) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.26.11.1273-a · Cited by 56
Choi, J., Lee, S. H., Fukushi, K., & Yamamoto, K. (2007) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.12.004 · Cited by 53 · cited 3×
“Most of the existing studies seeking to evaluate microbial diversity in the intestinal tract utilize fingerprinting methodologies such as denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) [68].”
BackgroundInfluentialShelton, D. R., Karns, J. S., Higgins, J. A., Kessel, J. A. S. V., Perdue, M. L., Belt, K. T., Russell-Anelli, J. M., & DebRoy, C. (2006) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00334.x · Cited by 52 · cited 1×
“coli O157:H7 can live in the lower gut of cattle and cause human illnesses through carcass contamination, farm run-off, or crop contamination [57-60].”
BackgroundZhu, W., Williams, B. A., Konstantinov, S. R., Tamminga, S., de Vos, W. M., & Akkermans, A. D. L. (2003) · Anaerobe · doi:10.1016/s1075-9964(03)00083-0 · Cited by 51
Bovine Necrotic Vulvovaginitis Associated withPorphyromonas levii
Elad, D., Friedgut, O., Alpert, N., Stram, Y., Lahav, D., Tiomkin, D., Avramson, M., Grinberg, K., & Bernstein, M. (2004) · Emerging infectious diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1003.020592 · Cited by 50
(2006) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e566452006-004 · Cited by 48
Comparison of bacterial flora and enzymatic activity in faeces of infants and calves
Rada, V., Vlková, E., Nevoral, J., & Trojanová, I. (2006) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00207.x · Cited by 45 · cited 2×
“Traditionally culture-based methods have been used to identify and enumerate commensal members of the ruminal and intestinal flora [13-15].”
BackgroundMethodEllinger, D. K., Muller, L. D., & Glantz, P. J. (1980) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(80)82957-2 · Cited by 42 · cited 1×
“The new method of bTEFAP is not limited to detecting organisms via culture methods, and can be used to define what constitutes a "healthy" or an "unhealthy" microbiome profile by correlating populations of bacterial species with dietary energy and protein utilization, host growth rate and efficiency, host gene express…”
MethodMin, B. R., Pinchak, W. E., Anderson, R. C., & Hume, M. E. (2006) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2005-399 · Cited by 40 · cited 1×
“Prevotella spp (tentative oralis, ruminicola and albensis) is a well known genus associated with the rumen of cattle [49,52-54] and is associated with ruminal carbohydrate and protein fermentation.”
BackgroundHernandez, J. D., Scott, P. T., SHEPHARD, R., & Jassim, R. A. M. A. (2008) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03696.x · Cited by 24 · cited 1×
“Prevotella spp (tentative oralis, ruminicola and albensis) is a well known genus associated with the rumen of cattle [49,52-54] and is associated with ruminal carbohydrate and protein fermentation.”
BackgroundUyeno, Y., Sekiguchi, Y., Tajima, K., Takénaka, A., KURIHARA, M., & Kamagata, Y. (2007) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03443.x · Cited by 22 · cited 1×
“Prevotella spp (tentative oralis, ruminicola and albensis) is a well known genus associated with the rumen of cattle [49,52-54] and is associated with ruminal carbohydrate and protein fermentation.”
BackgroundSalmonella Typhimurium persistence in a Hunter Valley dairy herd
Vanselow, B. A., HUM, S., Hornitzky, M. A. Z., EAMENS, G., & Quinn, K. (2007) · Australian Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1751-0813.2007.00224.x · Cited by 22 · cited 1×
“coli O157:H7 can live in the lower gut of cattle and cause human illnesses through carcass contamination, farm run-off, or crop contamination [57-60].”
BackgroundThe effect of rumen chitinolytic bacteria on cellulolytic anaerobic fungi
Kopečný, J., Hodrová, B., & Stewart, C. S. (2008) · Letters in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1472-765x.1996.tb00064.x · Cited by 18 · cited 1×
“may also be beneficial and improve digestion of complex organic matter such as cellulose and even act as beneficial probiotics [39-43].”
BackgroundSome aspects of the gastrointestinal microflora of veal calves fed different rations: A pilot study
Biesheuvel, M. H., Bijker, P. G. H., & Urlings, H. A. P. (1991) · Veterinary Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01652176.1991.9694291 · Cited by 13 · cited 1×
“The new method of bTEFAP is not limited to detecting organisms via culture methods, and can be used to define what constitutes a "healthy" or an "unhealthy" microbiome profile by correlating populations of bacterial species with dietary energy and protein utilization, host growth rate and efficiency, host gene express…”
MethodCRISTEA‐FERNSTRÖM, M., Olofsson, M., Chryssanthou, E., Jonasson, J., & Petrini, B. (2007) · Apmis · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0643.2007.00707.x · Cited by 12
Walter, M. R. V., & Morck, D. W. (2002) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 10
Isolation and Characterization of Rice-Straw Degrading Clostridia from Cattle Rumen.
Widyastuti, Y., Lee, W. B., Suzuki, K., & MITSUOKA, T. (1992) · Journal of Veterinary Medical Science · doi:10.1292/jvms.54.185 · Cited by 5 · cited 1×
“may also be beneficial and improve digestion of complex organic matter such as cellulose and even act as beneficial probiotics [39-43].”
BackgroundBinder, A., Amtsberg, G., Stock, V., & Bisping, W. (1984) · Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin Reihe B · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0450.1984.tb01319.x · Cited by 3
Pryde, S. E., Richardson, A. J., Stewart, C. S., & Flint, H. J. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.1.490a-490a.2001 · Cited by 3
[Intestinal and fecal flora of weaned piglets with nutritive diarrhea caused by forced feed intake].
Mm, W., Amtsberg, G., & Kamphues, J. (1984) · PubMed · Cited by 2
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Větrovský, T., & Baldrián, P. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057923 · Cited by 1,201
Bailey, M. T., Dowd, S. E., Galley, J. D., Hufnagle, A. R., Allen, R. G., & Lyte, M. (2011) · Brain, Behavior, and Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2010.10.023 · Cited by 1,123
“NET and C# analysis pipeline the resulting BLASTn outputs were compiled, validated using taxonomic distance methods, and data reduction analysis performed as described previously (Dowd et al., 2008b).”
MethodSegata, N., Haake, S. K., Mannon, P., Lemon, K. P., Waldron, L., Gevers, D., Huttenhower, C., & Izard, J. (2012) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2012-13-6-r42 · Cited by 1,076
Banerjee, S., Kirkby, C. A., Schmutter, D., Bissett, A., Kirkegaard, J. A., & Richardson, A. E. (2016) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.03.017 · Cited by 1,050
Pyrosequencing study of fecal microflora of autistic and control children
Finegold, S. M., Dowd, S. E., Gontcharova, V., Liu, C., Henley, K. E., Wolcott, R. D., Youn, E., Summanen, P. H., Granpeesheh, D., Dixon, D., et al. (2010) · Anaerobe · doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.06.008 · Cited by 977
Metadata
- Authors
- Dowd, S. E., Callaway, T. R., Wolcott, R. D., Sun, Y., McKeehan, T., Hagevoort, R. G., & Edrington, T. S.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dowd, Scot E
- Venue
- BMC Microbiology
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 125
- ISSN
- 1471-2180 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2515157
- OpenAlex
- W2105807803
- Cited by
- 1,121
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 105 · 2016: 116 · 2015: 121 · 2014: 129 · 2013: 99 · 2012: 75
- FWCI
- 11.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- BMC Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Keywords
- fecal microbiota, bacterial diversity, dairy cattle, Clostridium, Bacteroides, Ruminococcus, Lachnospiraceae, foodborne pathogens, Salmonella, Campylobacter, gut microbiota
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bacteria, Cattle, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Ribosomal, Feces, Female, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Gastrointestinal Tract, Biodiversity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review