The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Focused ultrasound-mediated suppression of chemically-induced acute epileptic EEG activity
Open accessAbstract
Background: Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder, which is attributed to uncontrollable abnormal hyper-excitability of neurons. We investigated the feasibility of using low-intensity, pulsed radiation of focused ultrasound (FUS) to non-invasively suppress epileptic activity in an animal model (rat), which was induced by the intraperitonial injection of pentylenetetrazol (PTZ). Results: After the onset of induced seizures, FUS was transcranially administered to the brain twice for three minutes each while undergoing electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring. An air-backed, spherical segment ultrasound transducer (diameter: 6 cm; radius-of-curvature: 7 cm) operating at a fundamental frequency of 690 KHz was used to deliver a train of 0.5 msec-long pulses of sonication at a repetitive rate of 100 Hz to the thalamic areas of the brain. The acoustic intensity (130 mW/cm 2) used in the experiment was sufficiently within the range of safety guidelines for the clinical ultrasound imaging. The occurrence of epileptic EEG bursts from epilepsy-induced rats significantly decreased after sonication when it was compared to the pre-sonication epileptic state. The PTZ-induced control group that did not receive any sonication showed a sustained number of epileptic EEG signal bursts. The animals that underwent sonication also showed less severe epileptic behavior, as assessed by the Racine score. Histological analysis confirmed that the sonication did not cause any damage to the brain tissue. Conclusions: These results revealed that low-intensity, pulsed FUS sonication suppressed the number of epileptic signal bursts using acute epilepsy model in animal. Due to its non-invasiveness and spatial selectivity, FUS may offer new perspectives for a possible non-invasive treatment of epilepsy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Image-Guided Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Stimulates Human Primary Somatosensory Cortex
Lee, W., Kim, H., Jung, Y., Song, I.-U., Chung, Y. A., & Yoo, S.-S. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep08743 · Cited by 414
Self-citationLow-intensity ultrasound neuromodulation: An overview of mechanisms and emerging human applications
Fomenko, A., Neudorfer, C., Dallapiazza, R. F., Kalia, S. K., & Lozano, A. M. (2018) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2018.08.013 · Cited by 322
Krishna, V., Sammartino, F., & Rezai, A. (2018) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3129 · Cited by 289
Focused ultrasound for neuromodulation
Darrow, D. P. (2019) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-018-00691-3 · Cited by 190
The Emergence of Functional Ultrasound for Noninvasive Brain–Computer Interface
Zheng, H., Niu, L., Qiu, W., Liang, D., Long, X., Li, G., Liu, Z., & Meng, L. (2023) · Research · doi:10.34133/research.0200 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Min, B.-K., Bystritsky, A., Jung, K.-I., Fischer, K., Zhang, Y., Maeng, L.-S., In Park, S., Chung, Y.-A., Jolesz, F. A., & Yoo, S.-S.
- Venue
- BMC Neuroscience
- Published
- 2011-03-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-23
- ISSN
- 1471-2202 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120900139
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Focused ultrasound-mediated suppression of chemically-induced acute epileptic EEG activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2202-12-23
- The paper
- Min, B.-K., Bystritsky, A., Jung, K.-I., Fischer, K., Zhang, Y., Maeng, L.-S., In Park, S., Chung, Y.-A., Jolesz, F. A., & Yoo, S.-S. (2011). Focused ultrasound-mediated suppression of chemically-induced acute epileptic EEG activity. BMC Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-12-23
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.