Cited by 303Glaucoma and retinal disordersRetinal Development and DisordersConnexins and lens biology

Progressive ganglion cell loss and optic nerve degeneration in DBA/2J mice is variable and asymmetric

Open access
Schlamp, Cassandra L, Li, Yan, Dietz, Joel A, Janssen, Katherine T, Nickells, Robert W·2006·BMC Neuroscience

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glaucoma is a chronic neurodegenerative disease of the retina, characterized by the degeneration of axons in the optic nerve and retinal ganglion cell apoptosis. DBA/2J inbred mice develop chronic hereditary glaucoma and are an important model system to study the molecular mechanisms underlying this disease and novel therapeutic interventions designed to attenuate the loss of retinal ganglion cells. Although the genetics of this disease in these mice are well characterized, the etiology of its progression, particularly with respect to retinal degeneration, is not. We have used two separate labeling techniques, post-mortem DiI labeling of axons and ganglion cell-specific expression of the betaGeo reporter gene, to evaluate the time course of optic nerve degeneration and ganglion cell loss, respectively, in aging mice. RESULTS: Optic nerve degeneration, characterized by axon loss and gliosis is first apparent in mice between 8 and 9 months of age. Degeneration appears to follow a retrograde course with axons dying from their proximal ends toward the globe. Although nerve damage is typically bilateral, the progression of disease is asymmetric between the eyes of individual mice. Some nerves also exhibit focal preservation of tracts of axons generally in the nasal peripheral region. Ganglion cell loss, as a function of the loss of betaGeo expression, is evident in some mice between 8 and 10 months of age and is prevalent in the majority of mice older than 10.5 months. Most eyes display a uniform loss of ganglion cells throughout the retina, but many younger mice exhibit focal loss of cells in sectors extending from the optic nerve head to the retinal periphery. Similar to what we observe in the optic nerves, ganglion cell loss is often asymmetric between the eyes of the same animal. CONCLUSION: A comparison of the data collected from the two cohorts of mice used for this study suggests that the initial site of damage in this disease is to the axons in the optic nerve, followed by the subsequent death of the ganglion cell soma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2202-7-66

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Axonal degeneration precedes neuronal loss in mouse models of tauopathy and glaucoma.

    “This alteration is an early event in tau-induced neuronal dysfunction and corroborates previous findings in mouse models of tautopathy and glaucoma, showing that axonal degeneration precedes neuronal loss (Schlamp et al., 2006; Leroy et al., 2007; Figure 1A, Table 1).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schlamp, C. L., Li, Y., Dietz, J. A., Janssen, K. T., & Nickells, R. W.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Nickells, Robert W
Venue
BMC Neuroscience
Published
2006-10-03
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
66-66
ISSN
1471-2202 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1553218248
Cited by
303
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 26
FWCI
10.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Research to Prevent Blindness (P30 EY016665, EY016665)
  • Glaucoma Foundation
  • National Eye Institute (EY016665, R01EY012223, R03EY013790, P30EY016665)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Connexins and lens biology
Keywords
DBA/2J mice, hereditary glaucoma, optic nerve degeneration, retinal ganglion cell death, axonal loss, gliosis, aging, glaucoma model
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, beta-Glucosidase, Carbocyanines, Cell Count, Disease Models, Animal, DNA-Binding Proteins, Glaucoma, Mice, Inbred DBA, Mice, Transgenic, Optic Nerve Diseases, Retinal Degeneration, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Time Factors, Transcription Factors, Chi-Square Distribution, Disease Progression, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligase Complexes, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review