CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 338Photosynthetic Processes and MechanismsPlant Stress Responses and TolerancePlant Physiology and Cultivation Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Salicylic acid alleviates decreases in photosynthesis under heat stress and accelerates recovery in grapevine leaves

Open access
Wang, Li-Jun, Fan, Ling, Loescher, Wayne, Duan, Wei, Liu, Guo-Jie, Cheng, Jian-Shan, Luo, Hai-Bo, Li, Shao-Hua·2010·BMC Plant Biology
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-10-34PMC PMC2848757
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the effect of salicylic acid (SA) on photosynthesis of plants including grapevines has been investigated, very little is yet known about the effects of SA on carbon assimilation and several components of PSII electron transport (donor side, reaction center and acceptor side). In this study, the impact of SA pretreatment on photosynthesis was evaluated in the leaves of young grapevines before heat stress (25 degrees C), during heat stress (43 degrees C for 5 h), and through the following recovery period (25 degrees C). Photosynthetic measures included gas exchange parameters, PSII electron transport, energy dissipation, and Rubisco activation state. The levels of heat shock proteins (HSPs) in the chloroplast were also investigated. RESULTS: SA did not significantly (P < 0.05) influence the net photosynthesis rate (Pn) of leaves before heat stress. But, SA did alleviate declines in Pn and Rubisco activation state, and did not alter negative changes in PSII parameters (donor side, acceptor side and reaction center QA) under heat stress. Following heat treatment, the recovery of Pn in SA-treated leaves was accelerated compared with the control (H2O-treated) leaves, and, donor and acceptor parameters of PSII in SA-treated leaves recovered to normal levels more rapidly than in the controls. Rubisco, however, was not significantly (P < 0.05) influenced by SA. Before heat stress, SA did not affect level of HSP 21, but the HSP21 immune signal increased in both SA-treated and control leaves during heat stress. During the recovery period, HSP21 levels remained high through the end of the experiment in the SA-treated leaves, but decreased in controls. CONCLUSION: SA pretreatment alleviated the heat stress induced decrease in Pn mainly through maintaining higher Rubisco activation state, and it accelerated the recovery of Pn mainly through effects on PSII function. These effects of SA may be related in part to enhanced levels of HSP21.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2229-10-34

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Pn, Ci and gs in leaves of grape plants sprayed with H2O (filled circles) and SA (open circles) at normal growth temperature (NT, 25°C), and treated with H2O (filled triangles) and SA (open triangles) under heat stress (HT, 43°C) and recovery. Each value is the mean ± SE of 4 replicates. 0.1 mM SA solution or H2O was sprayed at 9:30 h on Day 1, immediately afterwards photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were measured. Heat stress was from 9:30 to 14:30 h on Day 2. The recovery period was from 14:30 h on Day 2 to 9:30 h on Day 6. At the same time point, numerical values with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Figure 1 Pn, Ci and gs in leaves of grape plants sprayed with H2O (filled circles) and SA (open circles) at normal growth temperature (NT, 25°C), and treated with H2O (filled triangles) and SA (open triangles) under heat stress (HT, 43°C) and recovery. Each value is the mean ± SE of 4 replicates. 0.1 mM SA solution or H2O was sprayed at 9:30 h on Day 1, immediately afterwards photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were measured. Heat stress was from 9:30 to 14:30 h on Day 2. The recovery period was from 14:30 h on Day 2 to 9:30 h on Day 6. At the same time point, numerical values with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Donor side parameter (WK) and reaction center parameter (RCQA) of PSII in leaves of grape plants sprayed with H2O (filled circles) and SA (open circles) under normal growth temperature (NT, 25°C), and treated with H2O (filled triangles) and SA (open triangles) under heat stress (HT, 43°C) and recovery. Each value is the mean ± SE of 4 replicates. Treatment conditions are described in Fig. 1. At the same time point, numerical values with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Figure 2 Donor side parameter (WK) and reaction center parameter (RCQA) of PSII in leaves of grape plants sprayed with H2O (filled circles) and SA (open circles) under normal growth temperature (NT, 25°C), and treated with H2O (filled triangles) and SA (open triangles) under heat stress (HT, 43°C) and recovery. Each value is the mean ± SE of 4 replicates. Treatment conditions are described in Fig. 1. At the same time point, numerical values with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 ϕPo and acceptor parameters (ψEo and ΦEo) in leaves of grape plants sprayed with H2O (filled circles) and SA (open circles) at normal growth temperature (NT, 25°C), and treated with H2O (filled triangles) and SA (open triangles) under heat stress (HT, 43°C) and recovery. Each value is the mean ± SE of 4 replicates. Treatment conditions are described in Fig. 1. At the same time point, numerical values with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Figure 3 ϕPo and acceptor parameters (ψEo and ΦEo) in leaves of grape plants sprayed with H2O (filled circles) and SA (open circles) at normal growth temperature (NT, 25°C), and treated with H2O (filled triangles) and SA (open triangles) under heat stress (HT, 43°C) and recovery. Each value is the mean ± SE of 4 replicates. Treatment conditions are described in Fig. 1. At the same time point, numerical values with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Acceptor sides parameters Mo and (1-Vi)/(1-Vj) in leaves of grape plants sprayed with H2O (filled circles) and SA (open circles) at normal growth temperature (NT, 25°C), and treated with H2O (filled triangles) and SA (open triangles) under heat stress (HT, 43°C) and recovery. Each value is the mean ± SE of 4 replicates. Treatment conditions are described in Fig. 1. At the same time point, numerical values with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Figure 4 Acceptor sides parameters Mo and (1-Vi)/(1-Vj) in leaves of grape plants sprayed with H2O (filled circles) and SA (open circles) at normal growth temperature (NT, 25°C), and treated with H2O (filled triangles) and SA (open triangles) under heat stress (HT, 43°C) and recovery. Each value is the mean ± SE of 4 replicates. Treatment conditions are described in Fig. 1. At the same time point, numerical values with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 PSII efficiency and excitation energy dissipation in leaves of grape plants sprayed with H2O (filled circles) and SA (open circles) at normal growth temperature (NT, 25°C), and treated with H2O (filled triangles) and SA (open triangles) under heat stress (HT, 43°C) and recovery. Each value is the mean ± SE of 4 replicates. Treatment conditions are described in Fig. 1. At the same time point, numerical values with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Figure 5 PSII efficiency and excitation energy dissipation in leaves of grape plants sprayed with H2O (filled circles) and SA (open circles) at normal growth temperature (NT, 25°C), and treated with H2O (filled triangles) and SA (open triangles) under heat stress (HT, 43°C) and recovery. Each value is the mean ± SE of 4 replicates. Treatment conditions are described in Fig. 1. At the same time point, numerical values with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Rubisco activation state in leaves of grape plants sprayed with H2O (filled circles) and SA (open circles) at normal growth temperature (NT, 25°C), and treated with H2O (filled triangles) and SA (open triangles) under heat stress (HT, 43°C) and recovery. Each value is the mean ± SE of 4 replicates. Treatment conditions are described in Fig. 1. At the same time point, numerical values with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Figure 6 Rubisco activation state in leaves of grape plants sprayed with H2O (filled circles) and SA (open circles) at normal growth temperature (NT, 25°C), and treated with H2O (filled triangles) and SA (open triangles) under heat stress (HT, 43°C) and recovery. Each value is the mean ± SE of 4 replicates. Treatment conditions are described in Fig. 1. At the same time point, numerical values with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 HSP21 in leaves of grape plants sprayed by treated with H2O and SA under heat stress (HT, 43°C) and recovery. Thylakoid membranes were extracted from leaves. Equal amounts (10 μg) of protein were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Thereafter, the membrane was incubated with anti-Arabidopsis thaliana HSP21 antibody. Treatment conditions are described in Fig. 1. * indicates a significant difference (P < 0.05) between the control and SA-treated plants at the same time point.
Figure 7 HSP21 in leaves of grape plants sprayed by treated with H2O and SA under heat stress (HT, 43°C) and recovery. Thylakoid membranes were extracted from leaves. Equal amounts (10 μg) of protein were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Thereafter, the membrane was incubated with anti-Arabidopsis thaliana HSP21 antibody. Treatment conditions are described in Fig. 1. * indicates a significant difference (P < 0.05) between the control and SA-treated plants at the same time point.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Schultz HR: Climate change and world viticulture. Cost Action 858 Workshop: Vineyard under environmental constraints: adaptations to climate change. Abiotic stress ecophysiology and grape functional genomics. Poland: University of Lodz 2007.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 338

Related

Metadata

Authors
Wang, L.-J., Fan, L., Loescher, W., Duan, W., Liu, G.-J., Cheng, J.-S., Luo, H.-B., & Li, S.-H.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • China Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Shao-Hua
ORCID
Venue
BMC Plant Biology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2010-02-23
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
34-34
ISSN
1471-2229 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/1471-2229-10-34
PMC
PMC2848757
OpenAlex
W2067467448
Cited by
338
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Plant Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Institute of Botany, CAS Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Shandong Agricultural University
  • Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Keywords
salicylic acid, heat stress, grapevine, photosynthesis, photosystem II electron transport, Rubisco activation, heat shock proteins, HSP21, heat stress recovery, carbon assimilation
MeSH terms
Carbon Dioxide, Chloroplasts, Electron Transport, Hot Temperature, Heat-Shock Proteins, Photosynthesis, Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase, Stress, Physiological, Plant Leaves, Plant Transpiration, Salicylic Acid, Vitis, Photosystem II Protein Complex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review