The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Concerted suppression of all starch branching enzyme genes in barley produces amylose-only starch granules
Open accessAbstract
Background: Starch is stored in higher plants as granules composed of semi-crystalline amylopectin and amorphous amylose. Starch granules provide energy for the plant during dark periods and for germination of seeds and tubers. Dietary starch is also a highly glycemic carbohydrate being degraded to glucose and rapidly absorbed in the small intestine. But a portion of dietary starch, termed “resistant starch” (RS) escapes digestion and reaches the large intestine, where it is fermented by colonic bacteria producing short chain fatty acids (SCFA) which are linked to several health benefits. The RS is preferentially derived from amylose, which can be increased by suppressing amylopectin synthesis by silencing of starch branching enzymes (SBEs). However all the previous works attempting the production of high RS crops resulted in only partly increased amylose-content and/or significant yield loss. Results: In this study we invented a new method for silencing of multiple genes. Using a chimeric RNAi hairpin we simultaneously suppressed all genes coding for starch branching enzymes (SBE I, SBE IIa, SBE IIb) in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), resulting in production of amylose-only starch granules in the endosperm. This trait was segregating 3:1. Amylose-only starch granules were irregularly shaped and showed peculiar thermal properties and crystallinity. Transgenic lines retained high-yield possibly due to a pleiotropic upregualtion of other starch biosynthetic genes compensating the SBEs loss. For gelatinized starch, a very high content of RS (65 %) was observed, which is 2.2-fold higher than control (29%). The amylose-only grains germinated with same frequency as control grains. However, initial growth was delayed in young plants. Conclusions: This is the first time that pure amylose has been generated with high yield in a living organism. This was achieved by a new method of simultaneous suppression of the entire complement of genes encoding starch branching enzymes. We demonstrate that amylopectin is not essential for starch granule crystallinity and integrity. However the slower initial growth of shoots from amylose-only grains may be due to an important physiological role played by amylopectin ordered crystallinity for rapid starch remobilization explaining the broad conservation in the plant kingdom of the amylopectin structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Colorimetric Method for Determination of Sugars and Related Substances
DuBois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A., & Smith, F. (1956) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60111a017 · Cited by 52,269
Health properties of resistant starch
Nugent, A. P. (2005) · Nutrition Bulletin · doi:10.1111/j.1467-3010.2005.00481.x · Cited by 715
Measurement of resistant starch in vitro and in vivo
Englyst, H. N., Kingman, S. M., Hudson, G. J., & Cummings, J. H. (1996) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19960178 · Cited by 301
The complexities of starch biosynthesis in cereal endosperms
Hannah, L. C., & James, M. (2008) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2008.02.013 · Cited by 191
Cited by
The contribution of wheat to human diet and health
Shewry, P. R., & Hey, S. J. (2015) · Food and Energy Security · doi:10.1002/fes3.64 · Cited by 1,447
Resistant Starch: Promise for Improving Human Health
Birt, D. F., Boylston, T., Hendrich, S., Jane, J.-L., Hollis, J., Li, L., McClelland, J., Moore, S., Phillips, G. J., Rowling, M., et al. (2013) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.3945/an.113.004325 · Cited by 852
Health Benefits of Resistant Starch: A Review of the Literature
Bojarczuk, A., Skąpska, S., Mousavi Khaneghah, A., & Marszałek, K. (2022) · Journal of Functional Foods · doi:10.1016/j.jff.2022.105094 · Cited by 372
Health effects of resistant starch
Lockyer, S., & Nugent, A. P. (2017) · Nutrition Bulletin · doi:10.1111/nbu.12244 · Cited by 312
Li, H., Gidley, M. J., & Dhital, S. (2019) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12416 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Carciofi, M., Blennow, A., Jensen, S. L., Shaik, S. S., Henriksen, A., Buléon, A., Holm, P. B., & Hebelstrup, K. H.
- Venue
- BMC Plant Biology
- Published
- 2012-11-21
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 223-223
- ISSN
- 1471-2229 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107847305
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 16.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concerted suppression of all starch branching enzyme genes in barley produces amylose-only starch granules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2229-12-223
- The paper
- Carciofi, M., Blennow, A., Jensen, S. L., Shaik, S. S., Henriksen, A., Buléon, A., Holm, P. B., & Hebelstrup, K. H. (2012). Concerted suppression of all starch branching enzyme genes in barley produces amylose-only starch granules. BMC Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-223
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.