The DOI matches its Crossref record; 243 of the 243 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Health effects of resistant starch
Abstract
The merits of a fibre‐rich diet are well documented. Resistant starch (RS) is a form of starch that resists digestion in the small intestine and, as such, is classified as a type of dietary fibre. RS can be categorised as one of five types (RS 1–5), some of which occur naturally in foods such as bananas, potatoes, grains and legumes and some of which are produced or modified commercially, and incorporated into food products. This review describes human evidence on the health effects of RS consumption, with the aim of identifying any benefits of RS‐rich foods and RS as a functional ingredient. The reduced glycaemic response consistently reported with RS consumption, when compared with digestible carbohydrate, has resulted in an approved European Union health claim. Thus, RS‐rich foods may be particularly useful for managing diabetes. There appears to be little impact of RS on other metabolic markers, such as blood pressure and plasma lipids, though data are comparatively limited. Promising results on markers of gut health suggest that further research may lead to the classification of RS as a prebiotic. Microbial fermentation of RS in the large intestine to produce short‐chain fatty acids likely underpins some of its biological effects, including increasing satiety. However, effects on appetite have not resulted in notable changes in bodyweight after long‐term consumption. Emerging research suggests potential for RS as an ingredient in oral rehydration solutions and in the treatment of chronic kidney disease. Overall, RS possesses positive properties as a healthy food component.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes
Wu, G. D., Chen, J., Hoffmann, C., Bittinger, K., Chen, Y.-Y., Keilbaugh, S. A., Bewtra, M., Knights, D., Walters, W. A., Knight, R., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1208344 · Cited by 6,513
De Filippo, C., Cavalieri, D., Di Paola, M., Ramazzotti, M., Poullet, J. B., Massart, S., Collini, S., Pieraccini, G., & Lionetti, P. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1005963107 · Cited by 5,579
Gut microbiota in health and disease
Sekirov, I., Russell, S. L., Antunes, L. C. M., & Finlay, B. B. (2010) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00045.2009 · Cited by 4,182
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 3,809
Short chain fatty acids in human large intestine, portal, hepatic and venous blood
Cummings, J. H., Pomare, E. W., Branch, W. J., Naylor, C. P., & Macfarlane, G. T. (1987) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.28.10.1221 · Cited by 3,119
Topping, D. L., & Clifton, P. M. (2001) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2001.81.3.1031 · Cited by 3,091
Prebiotic effects: metabolic and health benefits
Roberfroid, M., Gibson, G. R., Hoyles, L., McCartney, A. L., Rastall, R., Rowland, I., Wolvers, D., Watzl, B., Szajewska, H., Stahl, B., et al. (2010) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114510003363 · Cited by 2,085
Regulation of short-chain fatty acid production
Macfarlane, S., & Macfarlane, G. T. (2003) · Proceedings of the Nutrition Society · doi:10.1079/pns2002207 · Cited by 1,939
Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat
Bouvard, V., Loomis, D., Guyton, K. Z., Grosse, Y., Ghissassi, F. E., Benbrahim-Tallaa, L., Guha, N., Mattock, H., & Straif, K. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00444-1 · Cited by 1,882
Cani, P. D., Neyrinck, A. M., Fava, F., Knauf, C., Burcelin, R. G., Tuohy, K. M., Gibson, G. R., & Delzenne, N. M. (2007) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-007-0791-0 · Cited by 1,774
Cited by
Dietary fibre in gastrointestinal health and disease
Gill, S. K., Rossi, M., Bajka, B., & Whelan, K. (2021) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-020-00375-4 · Cited by 979
Garcia-Mantrana, I., Selma-Royo, M., Alcantara, C., & Collado, M. C. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00890 · Cited by 574
Nondigestible carbohydrates, butyrate, and butyrate-producing bacteria
Fu, X., Liu, Z., Zhu, C., Mou, H., & Kong, Q. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2018.1542587 · Cited by 497
Martínez-Villaluenga, C., Peñas, E., & Hernández-Ledesma, B. (2020) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2020.111178 · Cited by 325
Update of the concept of type 5 resistant starch (RS5): Self-assembled starch V-type complexes
Gutiérrez, T. J., & Tovar, J. (2021) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.078 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Lockyer, S., & Nugent, A. P.
- Venue
- Nutrition Bulletin
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-01-05
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-41
- ISSN
- 1467-3010 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-9827
- OpenAlex
- W2567910054
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 243
- FWCI
- 22.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Health effects of resistant starch. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/nbu.12244
- The paper
- Lockyer, S., & Nugent, A. P. (2017). Health effects of resistant starch. Nutrition Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.12244
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
