The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selection of internal control genes for quantitative real-time RT-PCR studies during tomato development process
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The elucidation of gene expression patterns leads to a better understanding of biological processes. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR has become the standard method for in-depth studies of gene expression. A biologically meaningful reporting of target mRNA quantities requires accurate and reliable normalization in order to identify real gene-specific variation. The purpose of normalization is to control several variables such as different amounts and quality of starting material, variable enzymatic efficiencies of retrotranscription from RNA to cDNA, or differences between tissues or cells in overall transcriptional activity. The validity of a housekeeping gene as endogenous control relies on the stability of its expression level across the sample panel being analysed. In the present report we describe the first systematic evaluation of potential internal controls during tomato development process to identify which are the most reliable for transcript quantification by real-time RT-PCR. RESULTS: In this study, we assess the expression stability of 7 traditional and 4 novel housekeeping genes in a set of 27 samples representing different tissues and organs of tomato plants at different developmental stages. First, we designed, tested and optimized amplification primers for real-time RT-PCR. Then, expression data from each candidate gene were evaluated with three complementary approaches based on different statistical procedures. Our analysis suggests that SGN-U314153 (CAC), SGN-U321250 (TIP41), SGN-U346908 ("Expressed") and SGN-U316474 (SAND) genes provide superior transcript normalization in tomato development studies. We recommend different combinations of these exceptionally stable housekeeping genes for suited normalization of different developmental series, including the complete tomato development process. CONCLUSION: This work constitutes the first effort for the selection of optimal endogenous controls for quantitative real-time RT-PCR studies of gene expression during tomato development process. From our study a tool-kit of control genes emerges that outperform the traditional genes in terms of expression stability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR
Pfaffl, M. W. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.9.e45 · Cited by 34,610
MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0
Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2007) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msm092 · Cited by 28,730
Vandesompele, J., De Preter, K., Pattyn, F., Poppe, B., Van Roy, N., De Paepe, A., & Speleman, F. (2002) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034 · Cited by 20,038
Primer3 on the WWW for General Users and for Biologist Programmers
Rozen, S., & Skaletsky, H. (2003) · Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols · doi:10.1385/1-59259-192-2:365 · Cited by 15,013
Andersen, C. L., Jensen, J. L., & Ørntoft, T. F. (2004) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-0496 · Cited by 7,127
Hellemans, J., Mortier, G., De Paepe, A., Speleman, F., & Vandesompele, J. (2007) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r19 · Cited by 4,023
Czechowski, T., Stitt, M., Altmann, T., Udvardi, M. K., & Scheible, W.-R. (2005) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.105.063743 · Cited by 3,203
Quantification of mRNA using real-time RT-PCR
Nolan, T., Hands, R. E., & Bustin, S. A. (2006) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.236 · Cited by 2,247
Real-Time PCR for mRNA Quantitation
Wong, M. L., & Medrano, J. F. (2005) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/05391rv01 · Cited by 1,786
Guideline to reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR
Radonić, A., Thulke, S., Mackay, I. M., Landt, O., Siegert, W., & Nitsche, A. (2004) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.11.177 · Cited by 1,643
Cited by
Plant cholesterol biosynthetic pathway overlaps with phytosterol metabolism
Sonawane, P. D., Pollier, J., Panda, S., Szymanski, J., Massalha, H., Yona, M., Unger, T., Malitsky, S., Arendt, P., Pauwels, L., et al. (2016) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/nplants.2016.205 · Cited by 336
Evaluation of candidate reference genes for qPCR in maize
Manoli, A., Sturaro, A., Trevisan, S., Quaggiotti, S., & Nonis, A. (2012) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2012.01.019 · Cited by 274
Shoot Branching and Leaf Dissection in Tomato Are Regulated by Homologous Gene Modules
Busch, B. L., Schmitz, G., Rossmann, S., Piron, F., Ding, J., Bendahmane, A., & Theres, K. (2011) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.111.087981 · Cited by 122
Velada, I., Ragonezi, C., Arnholdt-Schmitt, B., & Cardoso, H. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115206 · Cited by 46
Rossmann, S., Kohlen, W., Hasson, A., & Theres, K. (2015) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12782 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Expósito-Rodríguez, M., Borges, A. A., Borges-Pérez, A., & Pérez, J. A.
- Venue
- BMC Plant Biology
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131
- ISSN
- 1471-2229 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2150606529
- Cited by
- 787
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 9.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selection of internal control genes for quantitative real-time RT-PCR studies during tomato development process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2229-8-131
- The paper
- Expósito-Rodríguez, M., Borges, A. A., Borges-Pérez, A., & Pérez, J. A. (2008). Selection of internal control genes for quantitative real-time RT-PCR studies during tomato development process. BMC Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-8-131
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.